nostr:npub1g53mukxnjkcmr94fhryzkqutdz2ukq4ks0gvy5af25rgmwsl4ngq43drvk not seeing the image reference rendering. Is it an either/or with the note embed?
toss an @ in front next time
This is how I can assume youāre good at what you do. Because at one point, everyone assumed you DID do it, otherwise you wouldnāt need to say that. You learned by breaking, right anon?
š«”
āEasierā depends on your unit of account & ability to self custody. No flow + usd denominated = not satflow.
Smoke & mirrors unfortunately, Iāll take a levered long position on Kollider/Ln market instead.
Mine anyways. Think of it as a small position dedicated to āsats at any costā, not in terms of profitability. What if you couldnāt buy or get sats for your goods/services?
Satflow, not cashflow - the new king.
Same same š«
Itās my first year anniversary on nostr šÆ
Yes, although a downside to me is Java (personal preference). I like it because of its usability. Itās āuser-dumbā interface assumption means that it presents all relevant information in a very clear way.
It works with practically all bitcoin-only software. I recommend Sparrow.
HesRightYouKnow.meme
Every fuckinā time man.
Drop crypto from your vernacular. 
The lack of a āsecure elementā. While coldcards implementation is so laughably better than ledger, itās not a fair comparison (thereās just zero competition to CC in this respect), a stateless design has the advantage of no illusion to security. When you pull the power to a seedsigner, your seed isnāt stored on the device, thus falling back to your storage designās native security assumptions (where/how you store your seed(s)).
Granted, the cost to attack a cold cardās stateful design is $250k+, so Iām really arguing about something out of scope for many.
However, the planned SS port to esp32 hardware further lowers the cost, adds optionality, and increases supply chain attack resilience (the argument is āwhat if someone hw hacks the suppliersā; search āsupermicro bloombergā for an example).