Avatar
Crizzo
22f22e98a035b8ff97d4cc4c5b34e65ccecae258430eeca46b17b1e8aabb8a5e
Bitcoin advocate | Hard money fetishist | Anti-infinity activist | FOSS fan | Econ enthusiast | Truth zealot | Consensus enjoyer | Perpetual skeptic | 🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️ Ally | Curmudgeon | One of The People | Apatheist | JDGAF

Idk about this. Forcing a service worker to go on a quest to figure out how to use their $1-$10 tip is probably not a good way to orange pill. It's almost like leaving those fake bills with religious crap printed on them. Or more like tipping in a foreign currency. If I were those service workers and not a Bitcoiner I would be very annoyed by this.

I still use WoS for zapping. Phoenix has a base fee of 1 sat per LN transaction which is almost 5% on a 21 sat zap. Still like Phoenix for larger LN stuff though.

I sent 1k from WoS to Phoenix just fine.

I only just started using Phoenix. Seems okay, but I don't like being reliant solely on ACINQ for my channels. I need to get my node up and running again.

Interesting discussions, but I think they are all too focused on the "Twitter replacement" angle. I think nostr will evolve into a more community oriented social network, where people connect to specific relays based on their interests or geography.

Like let's say someone builds a client for people that like video games. They run their own relays that only work with that specific client so they can curate the content and cultivate a certain type of experience. Someone else builds a client only for cooking enthusiasts and does the same. A user interested in both could use the same keys and still find their people on both of there's overlap.

There's so many possibilities for nostr which is what makes it so exciting. Who knows what it will evolve into. Being a Twitter replacement isn't the only possibility.

Yes, but probably mostly in fractions of a Satoshi by then.

It's compounded by the fact that the economics people learn in school is utter crap.

r/economics is the Dunning Kruger Effect taken to the extreme.

Replying to Avatar BitcoinEkasi

I'm married to a Russian woman who was born and raised in the Ukrainian part of the former USSR and both my kids speak fluent Russian.

You should know, Putin is a ruthless dictator who will kill you for saying the wrong thing.

But the smoking gun in this Ukrainian situation is the fact that senior American diplomats have been warning their own government, since the mid 90's, to stop military expansion to the east. For fear of exactly this situation the world now finds itself in.

Back then Russia was not a threat. The USSR had just collapsed. There was no need to further build up defences in Western Europe against Russia.

If the US followed the advice of their own advisers, chances are Putin wouldn't have amassed the power he did. Because like any good politician he's riding on the emotions of people, and the flames of those emotions have been fanned for decades, by a constantly growing threat, creeping in from the west.

So if you ask, who's the agressor in Ukraine? Obviously it's Putin.

But the question you should be asking is, who spawned him?

And the answer to that is that the existence of Putin is a reaction to an incessant desire for conflict, to the extent that conflict must be created when there is none.

And it is undeniable that this effort to create conflict has, since World War 2, and particularly since the collapse of the Soviet Union, been led by the US and its militray industrial complex.

It is the same story over and over again: create the enemy to justify the fight you want. Drunk idiots do it in bar fights, and this is no different. Except these guys aren't drunk on alcohol, but on something far more potent: power.

Bearded terrorists living caves, then Putin, then China. That's what you get when you spend more than half a century fomenting conflict to feed the beast.

I'm not defending what Putin is doing and if you think that's I'm doing, you're approaching this conversation with that same conflict driven mindset.

What I'm saying is: if you want to do something constructive, address the root cause of the problem.

Because even if Putin were to magically dissappear off the face of the planet tomorrow, the beast's desire for conflict would only foment it elsewhere.

And it's already clear where it's likely heading to next.

I kind of agree. The exploitive US dollar WRC system is at the heart of a lot of conflict all over the world. Not only does it indirectly destabilize weaker countries, the US also directly medles with them to maintain its dominance.

I hate the fact that this war in Ukraine is just another excuse to fund the MIC, and I wish we would stop spending so damn much money on military and weapons. However I still feel like backing Ukraine is the right thing to do for as long as this conflict lasts. Putin's 1984 style stranglehold on Russia should not be allowed to spread. What he does to the people of his country is similar to what the elites of the US do to the entire world, but his way of doing it is arguably much worse.

I still play with options in relatively small amounts for fun. Mostly just selling covered calls though, not too risky. I wouldn't recommend trying to be a trader. You'll never beat the high frequency traders running algos.