Avatar
StevenB
23103189356cf7c8bc09bb8b431fc3e71e85582c8f755b9ee160203c9c19e403
I make apps for retards, like LNBeats, Music Side Project, The Split Box, The Split Kit, Sovereign Feeds, CurioCaster and Transcript Search Tool
Replying to Avatar Cole McCormick

I’m aligned with most of what’s being said by you and nostr:npub19ha7tju4teqp3dmwv4p28wrcy9zd6h6hxkg5mwvjrlfycweazpkse2q0fa but it seems very ideological for a very niche thing. Is your electricity coming from a decentralized network? Do you pay a company for water? I would want every aspect of my life to be decentralized before I hate on a company for taking 10% for providing a service and having terms. All love for your values, I just don’t want to hate on a thing that’s actually apart of helping artists get paid.

Spotify = Artists don’t get paid.

Wavlake = Artists need to trust to get 90% of listener payment and then also have the freedom to move to a new host. It’s a completely different situation.

I think people misunderstand some of the issues. I don’t care if someone wants to pay for or charge for hosting. Now I’d argue if you are, you’re not v4v, you’re charging for a service, but I don’t care if you want to charge for your service. I pay for services all the time.

My main beef with Wavlake (and for the record I think what WL does is good for a lot of people) is they are an exclusive platform. If your music isn’t hosted by Wavlake, you can’t play it on Wavlake. I mean they can do whatever they want, but I wouldn’t call them an open platform.

My main beef with musicians is hosting your own music is so easy. Like it’s as easy as importing a CD and cataloging in iTunes. If you want to use a host or Wavlake because you understand the process and still want some else to handle a server going down, I get it. But I grew up with punk rockers with a DIY spirit, and hosting your songs is easier than screen printing a shirt or ripping a CD. I don’t want musicians thinking Wavlake or any other platform is doing a bunch of heavy lifting that is too complicated for the musician to figure out. I want them to be able to make informed choices. And if they host out themselves, they can do it for a little more than $1 a month. If they’re already hosting a website for their band, they can add their music and a feed for no additional cost.

If they make $100 a month, they have to pay $10 for the service. If it’s $1000 they pay $100. Or they can host it themselves and pay $1 or no additional cost. I just want the musicians to know there’s alternatives and their choices aren’t limited to Spotify or Wavlake, and Wavlake isn’t providing anything they couldn’t provide for themselves.

This is a very good summary of what the issues some of us have with Wavlake. We see BTC and RSS as freedom tech that lets us build things on our terms and conduct commerce peer to peer. Having a middle man to hold and distribute our sats, control our feeds, take 10% of the top, make us abide by their TOS, all for the privilege of being on their exclusive platform, well, that goes against some of our values. Now some people prefer a “free” and easy platform over taking control of their digital property, while others just aren’t aware there are other platforms that put digital sovereignty first. We don’t have a marketing budget to promote the alternatives, we only have our voices, which is why we may come across as so vocal.

Replying to Avatar The Doerfels

From what I understand wavlake is actually more of a centralized system. They are using podcastindex.org and Adam Curry helped get wavlake on the map because wavlake is using RSS and he was able to play music from them in a podcast. And it's also thanks to podcasting 2.0 who invented the wallet switching technology. There are artists who self host on our own websites and have our own nodes/wallets for Bitcoin and the closest we get to a centralized system is podcastindex being the directory for all the apps out there. All the apps that people can listen to wavlake artists in. But you can't listen to self hosted artists on wavlake. It's one way. And on wavlake you have to agree to wavlake terms(which aren't bad) but they are still like a middle man in this way. If people boost/zap our self hosted songs, the splits are visible how much to who right in our feed for all to see. Trasnparent. Wavlake just goes to wavlake, then they split it internally, not in the open. That might be fine. Maybe it has to do with how their wallets work. But I'd rather not create another industry to be controlled by people at the top. Terms and conditions can change and if they create a system you end up relying on and then they tell you they are taking more fees, you have to agree cuz everyone's already built around this centralized system. We want to create a community of people who value your music by making top quality music and people will decide for themselves how much it's worth. Just some of my scatterbrained thoughts on the subject 😁 - TJ

Not your keys, not your coins

Not your feed, not your terms

Did you know you can start your own record label? nostr:npub18gp8p84hjmjh9zejdlyqqcg22sj6x3qra0q2ng4v6cxxg95sav8q0mcg5e did with ThunderRoad Media. Know how to host files and build a feed? You can do it for the bands you love. They can focus on their music, you can manage their feed. It’s another form of v4v, where you’re trading your unique skill sets to create something greater than the sum of it’s parts.

The Doerfels are legit. And their story about how v4v reignited their love for playing is a good one.

Except Progressive Web Apps. Now there is some real decentralized freedom tech.

When I was working with my tools in the field, listening to podcasts gave me a better education than college ever did. Construction workers and truck drivers… some of them are the deepest thinkers I’ve ever met.

I keep hearing we need to build apps for the 99%. Nah, I’m good. I like building for the 1%. You guys are way more fun and interesting. I like being a one percenter.

If an MTV VJ and hillbilly banjo playing postman can (you know I love you Sir TJ), then you definitely can.

I’m working on integrating The Split Kit with nostr. It’s what a lot of the music shows are using to play their shows live, figured I could tie it into nostr some how

Better is subjective. The LNBeats app dev is scattered brain and never spends enough time to make any one app great. Wavlake only shows Wavlake hosted music. Wavlake takes 10% of an artists sats. LNBeats doesn’t take anything off the top. And I’m pretty you won’t hear this banger on WL.

https://lnbeats.com/album/a71b097b-4cf0-5e74-b6a9-1271373bb396/aHR0cHM6Ly9mZWVkLmJvd2xhZnRlcmJvd2wuY29tL2RlbXUvd2FpdC1pcy1vdmVyL3RoZS13YWl0LWlzLW92ZXIubXAz

Thought I’d try to see what this nostr thing is all about and maybe raise a little Cain

That’s my life motto