Jamming with the blues/rock band tonight! #grownostr #bandstr #saxstr
do you have you HAM radio license? I have been looking into it more.
Love them, can't help myself when I am around them and gummy worms!
Is there any risk of getting rugged by the federation?
Lol Nostr is a protocol, UX is up to the client!
I was using Astral, then switched to nostrgram, now using iris
I think this tx has to do with an ordinals mint, if you look at its prior address it comes from a tx that is split many times to the exact same amount. This appears very deliberate.
Also it guarantees service to those that need it by pricing out those that dont. Same argument for why price hikes in times of emergency are necessary. I ensures that supply or service remains available to those that need it the most, those that will pay the most for it.
Need easier ways to onboard people to PayNyms and broader support so more people can actually pay to them
Looking forward to more adoption as PayNyms are perfect for times like these!
More here:
https://foundationdevices.com/2023/02/making-sense-of-stealth-addresses/
Paynym would have been perfect! But I don't think there is a wallet for IOS that even has the ability to use Paynyms... It puts out a large portion of the tech community.
I think this was the plan...
It's high time I shared more on why I've shifted focus more to Bitcoin from Monero over the past several months, and my latest blog post is an attempt to do just that:
https://sethforprivacy.com/posts/why-i-focus-on-bitcoin/
Happy to dive into more detail for any of the points given or my reasoning behind this shift 🙂
Love this explanation!
#[0]
Yes, but then you can facilitate different identity with different medical providers and your medical data. Nostr clients have a difficult time facilitating the use of multiple accounts let alone a master controlling many identities :)
Nice, I would have thought DID would have come first, but I can see the orthogonal approach. Encryption and sovereignty makes sense but privacy could become a concern.
I agree, patients have the least amount of control in the US for our current system. The only problem is Insurance companies want to maintain full control. This proposal puts patients in more control. Therefore insurance companies I fear will fight this.
I am with you on this, although I would like to see more of a DID approach that could facilitate a different identity for each relationship. Incremental steps is the right approach.
you don't need a law, you just need people to demand it.
I would too! I think this is the way , we just have a ways to go to build up the demand for this. Insurance companies and healthcare companies will reject this I think.
The patients have to demand it, the insurance companies and hospitals want to maintain control of the data. Unfortunately I don't know many people that want to maintain their own data which is unfortunate form a privacy standpoint...
oh wow, I guess they always said they were the crypto platform for the banks... Makes sense they should go down with the banks ahahahahahaha