24
codeslaw
2427f7343e2ce3c91e958e51184c2765c351f68197731b0a6fbdd76616452beb
Programmer (Python, JS, C-based languages)

Not sure if this was a rhetorical question or not, but 100% they are propaganda. They just repeat the same things over the 24 hour news cycle to implant into mass consciousness how they want people to think and feel about whatever, and to not think about other things.

This makes absolute sense. They're just extending the loan, and the time to pay it off by having people pay on the interest accrual.

Replying to Avatar Tim Bouma

How Nostr’s Self-Signed Events Became an Unintentional Conceptual Breakthrough

Sometimes, the most profound innovations happen by accident. Nostr (Notes and Other Stuff Transmitted by Relays) was originally designed as a simple, censorship-resistant social media protocol. But in its design, it unintentionally solved one of the biggest problems in decentralized systems: how to create a universal, trustless data verification model without centralized issuers.

The key breakthrough? Self-signed events—a concept so simple yet so powerful that it fundamentally changes how identity, reputation, and data integrity work on the internet.

The Problem: Most Digital Identity Models Rely on Trusted Third Parties

In most identity and data verification systems, trust depends on a central authority (a government, a corporation, or a network operator). The Issuer-Holder-Verifier model—which powers systems like Self-Sovereign Identity (SSI) and Verifiable Credentials (VCs)—still assumes that:

1. An issuer must sign and vouch for the authenticity of data.

2. A verifier must check that signature against a trusted registry.

3. The holder is dependent on both parties for validation.

This model, even in its decentralized form, still reinforces external trust dependencies. It ensures that someone, somewhere, still has control over who can issue and revoke credentials.

The Nostr Breakthrough: Self-Signed, Self-Validating Data

Nostr’s design bypassed this entire structure by introducing self-signed events as the core data unit. Instead of requiring an external issuer to vouch for a message’s authenticity, the event itself proves its validity.

Here’s why this is revolutionary:

1. Every Nostr event is cryptographically signed by its creator.

• If the signature matches the public key, the event is valid.

• If anything in the message is altered, the signature breaks.

2. Verification requires no third-party trust.

• Anyone can check a signature without relying on a central authority.

• There’s no need to ask an “issuer” for validation—it’s built into the event itself.

3. No registry, revocation list, or lookup service is needed.

• Unlike the issuer-holder-verifier model, where verifiers check with an issuer, Nostr signatures are final and independent.

• The validity of a message is self-evident and self-contained.

Why This Matters: A New Paradigm for Trustless Systems

What started as a simple social media protocol accidentally created a universal model for decentralized, self-authenticating data. This breakthrough has implications far beyond Nostr:

• Decentralized Identity Without Issuers: Instead of a government or corporation issuing credentials, a person can simply sign messages proving ownership over data.

• Tamper-Proof, Uncensorable Communication: Because each event is self-authenticating, it cannot be modified or faked without breaking the cryptographic proof.

• A New Reputation Model: Trust can emerge organically by recognizing long-term, signed activity—without relying on external authorities to issue credentials.

Conclusion: Nostr as an Accidental Innovation

Nostr wasn’t created to replace digital identity systems or redesign trust models. It was just meant to be a censorship-resistant protocol for social media. But in its simplicity, it stumbled upon a fundamental conceptual breakthrough: self-validating, self-sovereign data.

This shift—from issuer-dependent verification to self-signed, universal proof—could reshape how we think about identity, credentials, and trust in a decentralized world.

Thank you sir!

I had to sell a couple million sats to buy a car.. and I'm bugging out trying to buy them back.

GM Nostriches! I have been on nostr for a bit now, and I have yet to make my #introduction post.

I am a programmer and I am interested in contributing to the nostr ecosystem. I am currently learning how to develop applications with AI/LLMs. I was wondering what you all think about how AI can be utilized in a decentralized future. Do you know of any open source projects that are interesting in this domain? I should also mention that AI isn't my only focus.

I look forward to be able to help in any way!

#asknostr #askdevs #ai #llm #programming

Replying to Avatar Jeff Booth

GM from beautiful Colombia.

With all the chaos and nonsense going on in the world right now, I wanted to share something that I believe is critical as it relates to what is happening on #bitcoin (the first global free market that can’t be cheated) versus a system of corruption (trying to stop that system) Either 1) through willful intent or 2) lack of knowledge.

(*the majority of people fall into the lack of knowledge group)

According to game theory and playoff matrices: even when there are very high rewards and low punishment (they wouldn’t get caught) approximately 10% of people won’t cheat - no matter what!They place a higher internal value on integrity that overrides external rewards. I’ve seen this number as low as 2.5% and as high as 20%.

Why is that important:

Although everyone wants to see themselves as one of the honest, the math says that between 80 - 97.5% of people will cheat depending on the rewards. Now enter money - the ultimate pot of gold with high rewards and low punishment for cheating because people don’t understand it. Most people will cheat - a mirror of the world we see and have seen in Bitcoin since its inception. Need inflation, bad for environment, drug money, doesn’t scale, crypto, meme coins - the list will go on and on because if people can “get rich at someone else’s expense - most will. Those are simply the numbers and always have been.

In fact, in prior periods of history, the honest were at a massive disadvantage because and would often be killed by the cheaters. Because the integrity was so rare, society would often celebrate these people after their deaths as lessons of what we wanted our higher selves to look like.

#bitcoin has changed the equation. Giving those with integrity the power. Why: because 2.5 - 20% of people that won’t cheat is a massive number - especially if many of those people are decentralized and can’t be “found”. Those are the people who eventually run nodes, contribute their time and energy to keeping #bitcoin decentralized and secure, watch for attack vectors, build value on top of this protocol, call out the cheaters, teach and advocate to help others see it. Those people simply can’t be bought, and more are joining every day.

That decentralized and secure protocol bounded by energy is repricing everyone and everything from the other system and it will continue to do so as that system tries to grapple with: the cheaters no longer make the rules.

It will be chaotic, many more will try to cheat (don’t be afraid to slay your heroes) but in the end…..Satoshi unlocked a way to put the best of us into a protocol that was best for all of us.

What a time to be alive.

Thank you Jeff and GM

Replying to Avatar Sean

This is such an interesting perspective for the future of AI. The perspective is from Mo Gawdat, former CBO at Google X. He resigned because a machine learnt how to pick up a yellow toy, then taught it's mates. He didn't like what it did, even though that was the aim in the first place.

The interesting perspective isn't the innovative mindset he portrays, but the complete closed mindedness of such a senior executive at a 'pinacle' entity.

Every single point of view is that of a centralised perspective. Which I wasn't suprised at. At all.

I picked the book up to take a peak into the mind of what most people would see as a genius at work.

I think we put these people on pedestals like celebrities. FAANGs are only innovative in the art of oppression.

The best advice he gives to stop humanity from fucking it all up with AI, is to stop giving it bad prompts.

Bad prompts..

He makes sure we know it's not the developers who will fuck it up, but us -we must be better humans. (Comply or Die)

That's all great in a rose tinted view of the world. But it's not going to happen, it's plain to see.

And I felt violated (even more so than the tracking Google does when it abuses my data for it's own selfish interest) by the narrow minded approach towards, what he describes, as what might be the end of humanity, because AI is smarter than us dumb humans.

The advice involves, posting better on Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram and the likes, so we can treat the algorithm better. Because we are teaching the AI with what we post.

I've got a better option. Delete all centralised algorithmic platforms that zap away your energy which you won't get back. Then you don't risk giving anything to these behemoths that might destroy us in the first place.

I think the book was written for the AI when they eventually take over, too. Like he wrote it as a form of social equity for the AI. At one point he names the AI 'Smartie', as if it's his child.

I'm perplexed.

https://nostpic.com/media/2f5de0003db84ecd5449128350c66c7fb63e9d02b250d84af84f463e2f9bcef1/d400e9f9e2ac17960b893b7147d9835f8dd77e42b3a2a357e80a2a5475eaa2f3.webp

Fuck em

Is the media hosted on nostr or is it some other bbackend with npub login?