Avatar
j
2590201e2919a8aa6568c88900192aa54ef00e6c0974a5b0432f52614a841ec8
keep nostr weird

You're missing the point.

I didn't call your previous argument non-sensical because you didn't leave room for exceptions but because you lumped everything in our evolutionary past into the probably good category whereas I would argue that it's very obvious which things were good and which weren't.

If you want an evolutionary argument it's better to think about pur evolved preferences.

For example, we evolved the preference to be repulsed by rot and excrament. This would not be possible had we not been exposed to these things for our entire evolutionary history. Yet your argument would say that rotting things are good because they've always been part pf my environment where I would tell you that, quite obviously, they are not.

The same can be said for worms or starvation.

Worms tho

You can believe that living naturally is good without going to thw extremes of irradiating yourself with natural uranium, starving yourself, then infecting yourself with worms.

I feel like I'm taking crazy pills over here

Morning spike in cortisol is tiny compared to what happens during fasting. Also not great, you can reduce it by having a warm glass of milk before bed.

Just trying to help. No need to call someone you'll never meet in person obese. Typical high stress hormone behavior.

Careful out there kids, if you fast you could end up this way too.

Even the natural radioactive elements in the environment are associated with reduced quality of life.

This is one reason people at high altitudes live longer and healthier lives than people at low altitudes.

Your point about DNA repair etc. is irrelevant. The reality is that every alpha particle you are exposed to increases your chances of death by cancer or (much worse) passing on a defective gene to your kids. If you had zero radiation exposure all of these probabilites would be reduced.

Sorry but I know about this stuff. Trust me, you are better off getting as far away from radioactivity as you can manage.

Sometime greenies mourn the fact that we have polluted the earth with radioactive particles that can't be all collected and cleaned up. And they think about how toxic some of them are, and how long some of them will last.

Here is my thinking on the subject.

All radioactive material is made up of atoms. Each atom has a half-life. Either it decays quickly, or it decays slowly. If it decays quickly it turns into something else which might also be radioactive in which case you just consider that atom instead. If not, well, you are done, the radioactive-ness has decayed away. So just wait a while and all the radiation problems will go away on their own.

Greenie: "But what about the atoms that don't decay quickly?" Well, you don't have to worry about them because they are barely radioactive, they decay so slowly that they present very little threat.

This logic isn't flawed, but it does skirt around some things.

If you have a large amount of long-half-life material, it can be dangerous for a long time. And if you have a large amount of medium-half-life material, it can be really dangerous for a medium time.

In those cases, the answer might be to dilute the material. Because it is the concentration that causes the radiation risk. Mix it in with dirt, mix that dirt in with more dirt, then bury the dirt. That seems to some like you are poisoning the Earth, but the Earth gave us this radiation in the first place, usually as Uranium. It already has dilute radiation. If you dilute well enough, it should be fine in terms of the radioactive issue.

The final thing I'm skirting around are the chemical properties of medium to medium-long half-life materials. Some of these things have weird toxic chemical properties independent of their radiation. So... um... don't eat them.

And have a nice day!

I don't think concentration improves the situation much. It's about getting them away from people.

If you have some uranium and you give half to your neighbor the harm done will be the same just spread accross two people. (There is no "safe" amount of radiation since each alpha particle can cause a an irreversible mutation, other things don't work like this bevause most damage can be repaired).

slave mentality

Emancipate yourself from this slavish fear of feds coming knocking

Become anon and stop caring about whatever difference these people think is so important between "hosted" and "custodial"

Just make yourself free to do whatever works for you, otherwise they'll just change the law and these cucks will be telling you to "use hosted wallets" because they "fit better in the current regulatory environment" or some other lame shit

nostr:nevent1qqsvdeuu4s0ppugdaj0dtq6e6v073092zqf3f944sekc54pdm3uug3cpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfdupzpr38l76unwuvm5qnrt0xa7jf64k5qx65ynvlm7dx8cr565nmqu2uqvzqqqqqqyen27l0

I fiat mine in the legal/financial world so I completely get where nostr:npub1t0nyg64g5vwprva52wlcmt7fkdr07v5dr7s35raq9g0xgc0k4xcsedjgqv is coming from. Custodial and hosted are similar terms with parallel meanings, implying a level of centralized control, but have significantly different legal financial implications.

Custodial means a central entity holds and controls funds on behalf of the user.

Hosted means a central entity controls the platform for a certain application or function.

This distinction is extremely important in the current hostile regulatory environment and it is vital not to conflagration the two publicly.

Again, Custodial implies certain very real financial legal responsibilities, mandatory registrations, and consequences for noncompliance.

bruh, the whole point of Bitcoin is to stop thinking in this slave mentality