You're missing the point.
I didn't call your previous argument non-sensical because you didn't leave room for exceptions but because you lumped everything in our evolutionary past into the probably good category whereas I would argue that it's very obvious which things were good and which weren't.
If you want an evolutionary argument it's better to think about pur evolved preferences.
For example, we evolved the preference to be repulsed by rot and excrament. This would not be possible had we not been exposed to these things for our entire evolutionary history. Yet your argument would say that rotting things are good because they've always been part pf my environment where I would tell you that, quite obviously, they are not.
The same can be said for worms or starvation.
Worms tho
You can believe that living naturally is good without going to thw extremes of irradiating yourself with natural uranium, starving yourself, then infecting yourself with worms.
I feel like I'm taking crazy pills over here
Very sympathetic to evolutionary arguments.
But in this case it's non-sensical.
Humans evolved with all kinds of intestinal worms and fungal parasites, should we then infect ourselves with worms to be healthy? No.
What you have to remember is that although evolution can (sometimes after millions of years) turn a formerly toxic substance into a benign one (or even a beneficial one, see oxygen). It is not omnipotent. A lot of the environment we evolved with is just harmful and evolution has not had enough time to make it not so.
Not going there with you
btw, I don't have any trouble with my weight. If this was still pre 2016 I'd challenge you to post physique and mog you
I don't even know where to start. You have a very mistaken world view if you can't even admit that radiation from nuclear decay is not exclusively harmful.
No wonder you've been tricked into believing that increasing your cortisol by fasting can be good for you and that a healthy body doesn't know how to regulate the amount of sugar in the blood. Or that everyone that doesn't agree with you is obese.
Morning spike in cortisol is tiny compared to what happens during fasting. Also not great, you can reduce it by having a warm glass of milk before bed.
Just trying to help. No need to call someone you'll never meet in person obese. Typical high stress hormone behavior.
Careful out there kids, if you fast you could end up this way too.
Fasting also comes with innumerable desteuctive effects the worst of which is an increase in cortisol.
Do not do this if you want to live a long and healthy life.
Also sun light has many beneficial effects with imo completely outweigh the mutagenic effects.
Radioactive decay has zero beneficial effects.
Even the natural radioactive elements in the environment are associated with reduced quality of life.
This is one reason people at high altitudes live longer and healthier lives than people at low altitudes.
Your point about DNA repair etc. is irrelevant. The reality is that every alpha particle you are exposed to increases your chances of death by cancer or (much worse) passing on a defective gene to your kids. If you had zero radiation exposure all of these probabilites would be reduced.
Sorry but I know about this stuff. Trust me, you are better off getting as far away from radioactivity as you can manage.
I don't think concentration improves the situation much. It's about getting them away from people.
If you have some uranium and you give half to your neighbor the harm done will be the same just spread accross two people. (There is no "safe" amount of radiation since each alpha particle can cause a an irreversible mutation, other things don't work like this bevause most damage can be repaired).
Absolutely. You really do get it.
This is why I critizie Tony when he gets on his high horse about about how hard he complies with regulations and how dumb altetnative solutions are. We should be building the tech to make that all irrelevant. Anything else will fail the second regulators really start fighting us
slave mentality
Agree. But it's better to just do it all anonymously and opt out of all this mess.
Emancipate yourself from this slavish fear of feds coming knocking
Become anon and stop caring about whatever difference these people think is so important between "hosted" and "custodial"
Just make yourself free to do whatever works for you, otherwise they'll just change the law and these cucks will be telling you to "use hosted wallets" because they "fit better in the current regulatory environment" or some other lame shit
I fiat mine in the legal/financial world so I completely get where nostr:npub1t0nyg64g5vwprva52wlcmt7fkdr07v5dr7s35raq9g0xgc0k4xcsedjgqv is coming from. Custodial and hosted are similar terms with parallel meanings, implying a level of centralized control, but have significantly different legal financial implications.
Custodial means a central entity holds and controls funds on behalf of the user.
Hosted means a central entity controls the platform for a certain application or function.
This distinction is extremely important in the current hostile regulatory environment and it is vital not to conflagration the two publicly.
Again, Custodial implies certain very real financial legal responsibilities, mandatory registrations, and consequences for noncompliance.
bruh, the whole point of Bitcoin is to stop thinking in this slave mentality