Hoarding is necessary for the aggressive adoption cycle of #Bitcoin. If we all start donating prematurely, Bitcoin will fail to achieve it's goal of being the reserve currency. I would rather it dismantle dollar reserve status first before thinking of giving it away now. One problem which #Bitcoin solves in future is more transparency in charitable causes, right now it is a blackhole with no accountability. That being said I do contribute to couple of kids meals program, but would like to do more and Bitcoin will help me do that in the near future.

Laser eyes on twitter talking about hoarding bitcoin, everyone gets in at the price they deserve, good luck being poor, etc.

I’m in bitcoin because it offers hope for humanity in a better money separate of state, and to revamp the circular p2p economy. Bitcoiners should be the most hospitable people on the planet, openly giving and donating sats to those in need (and many are, btw). Not going to stand by and let people spew that garbage.

Yeah, I think my article is written for folks that have felt that

Curious if anyone else is in this boat: I’m more cautious about saying things on Nostr than on Twitter — because deletion is much more straightforward on Twitter.

I feel this way even though I know that deleting on Twitter doesn’t actually remove it (the internet never forgets), and even though I know there’s a much smaller audience on Nostr.

Folks, wanting some input for the article I’m writing:

- if you had to summarize the “culture” of bitcoin the community, politically, what would it be

- Wherever you are in the world, is bitcoin a partisan issue and why (in your opinion)

- what is the biggest risk to widespread adoption, in terms of bitcoin’s social layer? Does the social layer (politics, culture, perception) matter to you, and why?

Thank you in advance 🙏🏻

Beyond Free Speech: Unleashing the True Power of Liberty

------------------

It's truly baffling when leftists obsess over free speech while seemingly downplaying the significance of property rights and personal liberties. This skewed perception of freedom is, to put it mildly, utterly perplexing.

Sure, free speech is important. It's the cornerstone of a functioning democracy, enabling the robust exchange of ideas and the voicing of dissent. But let's not forget that it's only one element of true freedom. When compared to property rights and the liberty of movement and association, free speech pales in significance.

Imagine a world where you can say whatever you want, but you can't own anything, travel freely, or hang out with whomever you choose. Would you still feel free? The ability to voice our opinions becomes a hollow privilege in the absence of these more tangible liberties.

Moreover, the fixation on "public" forums is an oddity in itself. The idea that the government or society should regulate the spaces where free speech is exercised only serves to undermine the very essence of the freedom they claim to champion. Instead, let's push for the decentralization of discourse, empowering individuals and communities to shape their own destinies without the looming shadow of state intervention.

So, let's not be misled by the allure of free speech as the ultimate freedom. Instead, let's strive for a world where property rights, personal liberties, and the sanctity of individual choice take precedence. For it is only in such a world that the true spirit of freedom can thrive.

It will be…

Here is the thing, yes I’m hyperbolic, yes I make ridiculous claims…

BUT you are prolly massively bearish anyways.

If Bitcoin works, none of us are smart enough to forecast what that really looks like.

Something’s got to give.

How's Peter Schiff doing today 🤔

$26,000 #Bitcoin

point in cycle where friends & family start reaching out