Avatar
Rock
27797bd4e5ee52db0a197668c92b9a3e7e237e1f9fa73a10c38d731c294cfc9a
Go and Floโ€™s dad โ˜บ๏ธ

I really really love how I was able to use my nostr:npub1cashappn03s3cl2ljsdntv0v28e2um5lgx4vjctqjt23pcwzjhsqmtdg5l debit card here in Tokyo ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต literally a lifesaver cause they wouldnโ€™t take my cash anywhere ๐Ÿ˜ญ

& stacking sats at the same time with bitcoin round ups is so based ๐Ÿ”ฅ

Heck yea, Sleep!!!! Great job stacking!

Keep an eye out on our Careers page for anything that you think could be a good fit for you or that you feel drawn to. If youโ€™d ever like to talk about any roles, just let me know and Iโ€™m happy to make time to help you understand more about Cash and Block. https://cash.app/careers

LETโ€™S GOOOOO!!!! If you ever find yourself with any questions, issues or ideas for how to improve this, you know where to find me!

If youโ€™re in the US, you can turn on Round Ups in Cash App and turn your spare change into sats, so every time you spend with Cash Card youโ€™ll stack (and have some ๐Ÿ”ฅ nuts and fries)

Nipples are evolutionarily older than teeth. Nipples and mammary glands are characteristic features of all mammals, and the evolution of mammals dates back to the Mesozoic era, over 200 million years ago.

Teeth, on the other hand, evolved later in the ancestors of modern mammals. The earliest known teeth in the fossil record are found in fish, dating back around 400 million years ago, but these are not the direct ancestors of mammalian teeth. The teeth that we associate with modern mammals have evolved through a separate evolutionary line that diverged from the toothless ancestors of mammals. Early mammal-like creatures called synapsids had different tooth structures that would eventually lead to the varied and complex dental arrangements seen in contemporary mammals.

So, while nipples (as a feature of mammals) appeared after teeth evolved in the broad scope of vertebrate evolution, the specific type of teeth that we see in modern mammals came after the development of features that define mammals, including nipples and mammary glands.

- ChatGPT

What spam reduction strategies are working well for clients? nostr:npub1stemstrls4f5plqeqkeq43gtjhtycuqd9w25v5r5z5ygaq2n2sjsd6mul5 uses a Share Pass that restricts sharing to those whoโ€™ve purchased (day, week or month pass), but I wonder if this may deter wallet-less newcomers? Seeking alternative ideas to balance quality control with accessibility for new users. #asknostr nostr:npub1jlrs53pkdfjnts29kveljul2sm0actt6n8dxrrzqcersttvcuv3qdjynqn nostr:npub1gcxzte5zlkncx26j68ez60fzkvtkm9e0vrwdcvsjakxf9mu9qewqlfnj5z nostr:npub1xtscya34g58tk0z605fvr788k263gsu6cy9x0mhnm87echrgufzsevkk5s nostr:npub16c0nh3dnadzqpm76uctf5hqhe2lny344zsmpm6feee9p5rdxaa9q586nvr

Replying to Avatar JSTR

nostr:npub1e2wk36e9vg8uw40phrrkkhc4tax8a9ken3fjcyy63vmdyz9aee2sk9el27 just passed the light speed barrier! nostr:note1lj2uy7xjpyv36fh2vnchnha3sf2n6cte7flj96kcmy244dh0u8gsmrswck

๐Ÿ’ฏ

On infinite repeat ๐Ÿ”„ nostr:note19kxpz0ja55r358dq40fcys69nw2axaswgyuzg4p95tak6tmh344sekzth4

Replying to Avatar pam

Talented musicians and artist, just like entrepreneurs, make it big when they breakout. Record labels, just like venture capitalist, sign them in and get them onto the next big thing. The pros are that there is already a per-existing network and connections for these record labels hence everything moves quickly. Confirmed gigs and good ones that is, with marketing sorted out for them. Musicians get paid. But record labels can take from 50% - 90% royalty of artists and bands.

Record label promotes and distributes, but you also need producers, and they take about 2% - 50% of streaming revenues. Good producers are rare and would make a big difference. The creative industry is very different yet similar to startups. Its a diff way of approaching what works, but the audience is all of us. And record labels / producers need good artist and bands just as much as artists and bands need them.

Back during the hippie era, the breakout from norm was heavy on creative expression and counterculture. The big battle was between the creative industry led by the left and capitalism led by the right (50s - 70s). An example of a creative industry led by capitalism would be Disney which synced and optimized creative processes to maximise output. This unfortunately meant a larger form of creative suppression.

To breakaway from the culture as a whole, a lot of indie artist emerged, but harder to make it big as indie or get funded well, let alone as a well as a breakaway artist. Jazz was big on individual expressions from the 20's era but I'd think Motown (record label) shaped African American music throughout the beatnik era - Marvin Gaye, Stevie Wonder. This beatnik period was a lot on finding a bridge between creativity and capitalism.

One reason why I think Tidal was a smart purchase is that the Bitcoin integration with rev stream and many features to it brings out all the past problems and strengths and finds the best way for capitalism to benefit creativity ie boost artists, increase visibility and improve payment modes.

Nostr music apps have just as much potentials, if not more.

My wild guess is that when Tidal and Nostr music apps takes off, there is going to be a revolutionary way in which record labels and producers start operating with new and better revenue streams. I believe this culture change will slowly start sipping into the movie industry as well, and maybe even independent entrepreneurs. It's definitely one of the more interesting integrations for the future, from a historical perspective

I think about this a lot. Great questions.

Spin around very quickly and many times while standing on some high quality grass. Stop and let the first thing that comes to your mind be the name. This works every time ๐Ÿค—

Replying to Avatar Lyn Alden

For any nostriches that happen to be in the PA/NJ/NY/CT region, I'll be doing a talk at Princeton on Feb 6th 2024 about Broken Money.

https://gceps.princeton.edu/events/

I'll then potentially be discussing/debating with some of their economics professors, and a former central banker from Canada will be involved as well. Fun stuff.

Welcome to the East Coast!!!

Replying to Avatar 0xbitcoiner

# The blockchain trilemma

![image](https://void.cat/d/Lsm5729KQbzm15ng2q2wA4.webp)

Blockchains are capable of processing a limited number of transactions per second. The Bitcoin network, for example, can process about seven transactions per second. If the goal is global adoption of blockchain technology, it must be able to process a much larger volume of data and offer faster transactions. This way, more people can use the network without slowness or high costs involved. However, the design of many decentralized networks means that increasing scalability decreases decentralization or security. This problem is known as the blockchain trilemma. Programmers who are trying to solve this problem are experimenting with different consensus mechanisms and scalability solutions, such as sharding, sidechains, state channels, and the Bitcoin Lightning Network (layer 2).

The term trilemma was popularized by Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin. The blockchain trilemma is the three desirable elements in a blockchain: decentralization, security, and scalability. The blockchain trilemma refers to the idea that it is difficult for a blockchain to achieve ideal levels of all three properties simultaneously. Focusing on one of them usually causes the weakening of another.

The most obvious and basic solution to the problem is to reduce the number of participants who confirm and add data to the network, in exchange for greater scalability and speed. But this harms the decentralization factor, as control would be in the hands of a smaller number of participants. And it would also cause a weakening of security, as with fewer participants there would be a higher probability of attacks. There is no single miracle solution to the trilemma. But given the importance of solving this problem, there has been a series of different approaches in the community with interesting results.

The scalability trilemma prevents blockchain from fulfilling its potential as a technology to change the world. If blockchain networks are only able to handle a small number of transactions per second to maintain decentralization and security, it will be difficult to achieve mass adoption. However, the solutions presented by programmers who are looking to solve this problem suggest that the technological advances already made by blockchain technology are on the right track. In the future, networks will be able to handle a much larger volume of data.

This is a made up concept to drive the adoption of a technology. Lightning solves this and allows bitcoin to handle massive payment volume and speed.