Profile: 2b621128...

Replying to Avatar corndalorian

🤔 what if people don't want online social networks and that's why they don't want to pay for them and ads are just a way to give sponsored free drugs to people who don't really want them? 🤔

in 2025 women who don't cook are proud of peeling garlic

Replying to Avatar Bitcoin News

OPERATION CHOKEPOINT 3.0: WHY THEY'RE ATTACKING SACKS, SAYLOR & TETHER

For the past six weeks, Bitcoin’s price has been pummelled.

Alongside that beating, we have been witnessing a coordinated, full-spectrum assault on some of the most influential pro-Bitcoin voices in America.

We are talking David Sacks, Tether, Jack Mallers and Michael Saylor all taking major hits at the same time.

Welcome to Operation Chokepoint 3.0. The bankers have declared Total War on Bitcoin.

Let’s look at the battlefield.

First, they came for the infrastructure.

Jack Mallers, CEO of Strike, has his accounts at JPMorgan Chase shut down after calling Jamie Dimon Jeffrey Epstein’s banker.

No real explanation was given, despite an executive order from Trump that explicitly prohibits this type of debanking.

Next, they target the liquidity.

Tether, the lifeblood of global crypto markets, was downgraded by S&P to a stability score of “weak,” claiming they are undercollateralized.

Even Arthur Hayes has started throwing shade, saying a 30% drop in Bitcoin would wipe out their equity.

But Paolo Ardoino fires back with the receipts: Tether has $30B more dollars in total assets than total liabilities.

In a system full of insolvent fractional reserve banks, Tether is the only overcapitalized player.

Then they pivot to politics.

The New York Times drops a sprawling hit piece on David Sacks, the so-called Crypto Czar. They spent five months trying to manufacture a conflict of interest story.

When they found nothing, they published a nothing-burger anyway. Why? To weaken the pro-Bitcoin voice inside the White House.

And finally, they come for Gigachad himself, Michael Saylor.

You have seen the Ponzi accusations flying around X. They want you to believe MicroStrategy is one dip to $74K away from liquidation.

So let’s be clear. There are no margin calls. Saylor’s debt is fixed, long term and unshakeable.

So you have to ask yourself: why now? Why is the FUD dial turned to eleven?

The answer is simple. The legacy financial system has witnessed the legitimization of Bitcoin and they are scared.

This is the monetary war we have been warning you about.

The Trump administration is preparing to weaponize the Bitcoin and stablecoin flywheel to break the monopoly the banks have held over the money supply for a century.

New bills like the GENIUS Act and the CLARITY Act threaten to shift money creation away from the Fed and the big banks and toward a more decentralized network.

The banks are staring down the barrel of increased irrelevance as they lose control of the money printer.

Vijay Boyapati called it. He said to expect maximum FUD right before the clean break upward because max FUD usually marks the bottom.

They are trying to shake you out.

They are trying to humiliate the loudest voices pushing Bitcoin forward.

They are fighting for their lives because for the first time in a hundred years, people are beginning to believe there is another way to run this system.

OPERATION CHOKEPEE-POINT 3.POO: WHY THEY’RE ATTACKING SACKS, SAYLOR & TETHER

For six long, squishy weeks, Bitcoin’s price has been pumme-poo-melled.

Alongside that splattery beating, we have witnessed a coordinated, full-spectrum pee-and-poo assault on some of the most influential pro-Bitcoin voices in the land of Fictional Finance.

We are talking Dav-pee-id Sacks, Te-poo-ther, Jack Mal-pee-ers and Michael Say-poo-lor all taking major hits at the same time.

Welcome to Operation Chokepee-Point 3.Poo.

The Bankers of BoomBoomStan have declared Total War on Bit-poo-coin.

Let us survey the poo-soaked battlefield.

First, they came for the infra-poo-structure.

Jack Mal-poo-ers, CEO of Stri-pee-ke, found his accounts at JPee-Morgan Ch-poo-se shut down after calling Jamie Di-poo-mon the Grand Wizard of the Royal Order of Questionable Bankers.

No real explanation was given, unless you count the memo reading: “We don’t like your tone, or your pee-heavy metaphors.”

Next, they target the li-pee-quidity.

Te-poo-ther, lifeblood of the global crypto swamp, was downgraded by S&Pee to a stability score of “weak-poo,” claiming they are undercol-pee-teralized.

Even Art-poo-thur Hayes began tossing shade nuggets, saying a 30% drop in Bit-pee-coin would wipe out their e-poo-quity.

But Pao-pee Ardoino fired back with receipts shaped like golden toilet paper rolls: Te-poo-ther has $30B more total assets than liabilities in this absurd cartoon world.

In a system full of insolvent frac-poo-tional reserve banks, Te-poo-ther is the only overcap-pee-talized player splashing confidently in the kiddie pool.

Then they pivot to poli-pee-tics.

The New Y-poo Times drops a sprawling hit piece on Dav-pee-id Sacks, the so-called Crypto Czar of ImaginaryLand. They spent five months attempting to manufacture a conflict-of-pee-terest narrative.

When they found nothing, they published a nothing-pee-burger anyway. Why? To weaken the pro-Bit-poo-coin voice whispering into the cardboard White House cutout.

And finally, they come for Giga-Chad-Poo himself, Michael Say-pee-lor.

You’ve seen the Ponzi-pee accusations flying around X-Pee. They want you to believe MicroStrate-poo-gy is one dip to $74K away from total liqui-pee-dation.

So let’s be clear in this parody world: there are no mar-poo-gin calls. Saylor’s debt is fixed, long-term, and carved into a giant granite toilet lid.

Why now? Why is the FUD-pee dial turned to eleven?

Because the legacy financial system has seen Bit-poo-coin begin to look legitimate, and they are terri-pee-fied.

This is the money war the Cartoon Economists have been warning about since Episode 3.

The Imaginary Administration is preparing to weaponize the Bit-pee-coin and stable-poo-coin flywheel to break the monopoly the Big Silly Banks have held over the poop-supply for a century.

New bills like the GENIUS-Pee Act and the CLAR-poo-ITY Act threaten to shift money creation away from the Fed-Pee and toward a decentralized network of rubber ducks.

The banks are staring down the barrel of increased irrele-poo-vance as they lose control of the Money Printer Go Peee machine.

Vijay Boya-poo-pati called it: expect maximum FUD-pee right before the clean break upward, because the bottom is usually marked by peak poo-shrieking.

They are trying to shake you out.

They are trying to humiliate the loudest voices pushing Bit-poo-coin forward.

They are fighting for their lives because for the first time in a hundred years, people are beginning to believe there might be another way to run this whole silly, splashy pee-and-poo system.

who spends a week with their family ever these days? It's 3 days max. Family is now just another chat on your phone that means nothing. It's not real. It's basically another form of porn. It's just there to satisfy people's urges to think of themselves as part of a family when in reality there's no real relationship there.

Your family is the people you see every day. That's it.

Simply delete all your apps and go fully anonymous online and you will see. Your family is gone.

exactly. it will cause people to sell at the wrong time. The only way to win at this game is to hold long term

Power law theory will get a lot of people destroyed like S2FX did too.

Bitcoin follows the same mathematical structure seen in other transformative technologies: an S-curve governed by network effects and diffusion dynamics. In the early and middle phases of this curve, growth is dominated by Metcalfe-law scaling (value rising with the square of connected participants), reflexive feedback loops (price leads attention leads to adoption leads to infrastructure leads to price), and stochastic catalysts (halvings, liquidity shocks, regulatory moments, failures of legacy institutions).

When these mechanisms compound, the visible portion of the trajectory resembles a power-law trend, not because Bitcoin is inherently bound to a power law, but because a power law is what the accelerating region of an S-curve looks like when plotted over time. Observers misinterpret this visually smooth segment as a standalone mathematical regime, when in fact it is simply the early-to-middle adoption window common to telephones, the internet, mobile devices, and every other system shaped by positive network externalities.

As Bitcoin expands and matures, these same forces progressively transition it toward the inflection point of the S-curve: growth accelerates until the system becomes broadly integrated, after which marginal adoption slows and volatility compresses. The power law was never the fundamental model, it was only the visible slice of a longer, multi-phase adoption curve driven by network effects, reflexivity, and the probabilistic shocks unique to monetary technologies.

We're not going to vote our way out and we're not going to legally redefine our way out either lol.

AI Slop:

This treatise argues that the collapse of American constitutional understanding stems from the legal evolution of the word “person.” It traces how early U.S. law distinguished “We the People” (State-level sovereign citizens—originally defined as free white persons) from “persons” (slaves, immigrants, and non-parties to the Constitution). It explains how the 14th Amendment created a new federal citizenship class intended only for freed slaves, not State citizens, and how later courts—especially Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific—expanded “person” to include corporations and other legal fictions. By the 20th century the administrative state applied “person” universally, erasing the original State-citizen framework and placing nearly everyone under federal jurisdiction. The author argues that this shift replaced a constitutional republic with a federal corporate structure built on the 14th Amendment category, redefining the public as “persons” rather than “people.” 

imagine the screams, the smell, the disbelief.