Whitney is an interesting woman. I spent a few hours with her early last year at a conference dinner.
Let me first say, I REALLY admire her and I follow her work.
-I will also say, she is suspicious of everyone and sees monsters under some beds that I do not.
🍻🧡👊🏻
Ah yes. A wise man once told me…
Please explain this to my younger self pls. Thx
Will zap.
So simple.
You’d think everyone would understand and be…
“Better”
🍻🧡👊🏻
🍻🧡👊🏻
God damn right.
Happy Friday
🍻🧡👊🏻
Listened to some today during commute. Very measured and respectful debate. Thanks for the heads up.
Tucker has really been having some fantastic guests lately.
🍻🧡👊🏻
Fucked up the link while trying to remove tracking…
But again, why is the Catholic Church like this?
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/16/us/archidiocese-los-angeles-abuse-settlement.html#:~:text=The%20settlement%20is%20the%20highest,to%20more%20than%20%241.5%20billion. nostr:note1rxleuqtl78xa063chwvrdx2sd4swds6z9mcm722uffvg5hdwsqus8w0v7q
Power structures that get too much power ultimately attract undesirables that then corrupt such power structures.
Idealistic entities are not immune in any way.
I think prediction markets are pretty neat. They were the primary way of predicting the outcome of elections prior to the invention of modern opinion polling.
In recent weeks the polymarket for the US presidential election has noticeably diverged from the polling. The polls have stayed flat, it’s essentially a coin flip as to who will win. The prediction markets have broke to Trump with a 60% chance of winning. Is this a real shift that bettors are seeing vs the polls or is someone manipulating the market. You could make the argument that placing bets on your preferred candidate is a capital efficient way of shifting the outcome. Journalists use the markets to shape their coverage and will start writing articles about momentum when they see the prediction markets shift. Elections are very messy so it’s easy enough to find evidence of momentum in any direction if you’re looking for examples to fit the narrative. And the narrative about a candidate pulling ahead will lead to more press and focus and is likely to help the candidate get more votes on Election Day.
All of this to say it appears one person is attempting to do this in favor of Trump.
https://www.cryptopolitan.com/bettor-trump-harris-betting-pair-polymarket/
More accurate than the current polling methods imo but yeah its a toss up.
I think its more interesting that this is the first election in my lifetime that no matter who wins, the other side Will truly believe the other side didn’t steal it.
We’re not evolutionarily capable of coping with constant negative bombardment.
Good on you for recognizing it and giving up the doom scrolling.
Social media is inadvertently trying to murder your brain.
🍻🧡👊🏻
It’s not a myth. Elon will not be genuine talking about this because Neuralink and Tesla would fail if people understood the biological harms of non-native EMFs.
I defer to biophysicists like Dr Jack Kruse on the topic of how sensitive our bodies are to foreign electromagnetic signals. He goes into electron-level detail.
https://bengreenfieldlife.com/podcast/lifestyle-podcasts/is-bluetooth-radiation-dangerous/
👍
Welcome!
nostr:note1vcsu72cfqgyftvurt2vq64zkav758nfyyg8jknqwfulxyjkqydvqpumhf5