> "great work"
I didn't do anything 😆😆
but thanks
First try with #mkStacks. Thought of the name "vibes check" first and then decided on what it should do after. This took a few minutes and exactly zero manual code edits from me.
Wtf.... nostr:npub1q3sle0kvfsehgsuexttt3ugjd8xdklxfwwkh559wxckmzddywnws6cd26p you have done something VERY STRANGE AND INCREDIBLE here.

here we have perfection.
Locally-raised bacon-wrapped medjool date topped with nostr:nprofile1qqswp94gnm4epqsgjkndl4lnd8krzdj5u4mzuppdtxksdymkty63g7gpzamhxue69uhkv6tvw3jhytnwdaehgu3wwa5kuegpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduq35amnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwwpexjmtpdshxuet59ujnyvqtjx784 #hodlButter

...why..? what is this about?

Bitcoin is uniquely suited for saving for many reasons, but the most important may be that there is equal overhead for saving 1 sat or saving 1 hundred million sats.
Most assets or goods imply some cost or overhead to stockpile and save. This can conflict with marginal utility: since you don't need the good to satisfy a pressing need today, the "cost" of storing it long-term has to work out with regard to your confidence that you will need it in the future for a more pressing need later.
That conflict is removed when there is low to no cost for saving arbitrary units.
Umbrel, LNBits, Phoenix, BlueWallet, Alby, AlbyGo, Aqua wallet, Sparrow, BitKit, StackDuo, Misty Breez, Nunchuck, RoboSats, Strike, Zeus, Wallet of Satoshi.
All of these things work very well for me.
I wouldn't expect PayPal nor Venmo to be great Bitcoin tools.
me too. just coffee, your dog, and me.
what will you be selling ?
I totally agree
but okay full paranoia mode: a state actor on the other end of a Robosats transaction, records timestamp + fiat amount + username at the time, later on in a war on bitcoin holders subpoenas Strike for KYC on this user = knock on your door, "where is that bitcoin you bought".
nuclear, sure... but there are ways around even this - like paying with Liquid USDT from a noncustodial wallet.
good point
very odd. I can get there but I don't have this option. maybe a state by state thing or something.. because I also don't have the loan options yet.
I'll put one in at 4 cents.
...and we see demonstrated in real time how prices work!
lol I'm buying
nostr:nprofile1qqsx8zd7vjg70d5na8ek3m8g3lx3ghc8cp5d9sdm4epy0wd4aape6vspz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumt0wd68ytnsw43qzrthwden5te0dehhxtnvdakqzymhwden5te0dejhwueww468smewdahx2wtv8wk 's recent episode has me eyeballing that nostr:nprofile1qqsfnnh6v3dspqtnwv3e46aed5k3nypyfx2wtet92ekg9szt3hr9k4qpzfmhxue69uhhqatjwpkx2urpvuhx2ucpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgqffwaehxw309ahx7um5wgcnvdekxvcnjdfkxucnwvpwv9c8qtnjw4hx7mnxd36hstnfduv3xupd goodness...
I did just run out of some store-bought stuff recently and it wasn't even graas fed.
⚡️🎙️ NEW - Joe Rogan just discussed #Bitcoin in his latest podcast. "What is money? It's all ones and zeroes."
https://blossom.primal.net/f522e1fd8047eedc251aa001c0ade4570c473dcbcc2c0377afb85bf2b1135758.mp4
too bad Joe is seemingly unaware of quantum-resistant schemes
when I checked on it a little later the estimate went from 16 hours to 4. so maybe disregard
as long as nobody sells they can just wait a little longer until the next update with larger number after the bear.
it's so easy :)
you can repost this every few months with a slightly larger number
buy a pepper mill 😉
I like to to think there is a little nostr:nprofile1qqsdhrefrh8efymn753yquxtaa86hq9e4rf5xsjx4jsludq3fnz3m5qppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hj7v9kpll is all of us...
😉
well he's definitely gotten under my skin a few times and I'm sure he left a bit behind 😆❤️
holy shit I just accidentally zapped you five bitcoins fuck fuck how do I revert?!
I've always liked Jameson and still do. I don't love his behavior in op_return but I still like him and his work
You would denominate the deposits in USD (and the goods) and perhaps the plucky soul who is running the mint could put up his own funds 1:1 for all deposits and then hold the BTC himself, taking on the price fluctuation risk.
The goal is to save merchants (and customers) the sometimes nearly 4% credit card processing fee. if you wanted to get very creative - after more analysis than I'm doing off the cuff right now - you could have the merchants pay a much lower processing fee, maybe 1% or 0.5%, and that could be pocketed by the aforementioned mint backer to offset his risk. If the Bitcoin price is favorable for a period, maybe he even refunds that fee back to the merchants or refunds + a bonus.
Agreed that the #1 goal is consistency and ease of use (and discounts) for the customers, and #2 goal is savings for the merchants. It's not simple bringing the this lower-fee, instant/guaranteed settlement network to uninitiated merchants and customers; there are some tradeoffs. But if whoever is attempting to run this operation is sufficiently incentivized to see it through, he could take on a bit of risk himself (and thus all the downside in the tradeoff...) in order to help it succeed with good UX.
I'm trying not to presume **too much** about "people like you", as you're not a monoculture / hivemind, I would hope.
do you think you can make the case that human life begins at conception without involving any religious or supernatural concepts?
I think you're missing the original point about "active denial" vs "irrelevance".
You don't actively deny every jurisdiction that doesn't apply to you, not to mention the infinite number of nonexistent jurisdictions that you could _imagine_ and don't even purport reign anywhere. They are more like "irrelevant" or "N/A". Supporting a distant (or imaginary) jurisdiction is an active choice, simply not thinking about them is as close to neutral state of nature as you can get.
Did you think about an elephant while reading that paragraph? If not, were you "denying the elephant"?
No, the NAP apples to human persons as human persons: 1) to quote Rothbard, "The animals may have rights when they petition for them"; and 2) to quote that other eminent philosopher, Dr. Suess, "a person's a person, no matter how small." "Object permanence" is a very early stage of childhood development that a lot of pro-"choice"-ers seem to have missed: just because you cannot see it, doesn't mean it isn't there. Peek-a-boo! ;-)
Surely you don't mean that we can aggress against the mentally handicapped with impunity? Who gets to define the line between the capable and the incapable? Because, honstly, that last sentence reads like it's on a trajectory toward "useless eaters" having to "justify their existence" to the deciders - a la [George Bernard Shaw](https://www.bitchute.com/video/PK53hCbuScna/). Surely, you don't mean that?
If you want to use that Rothbard quote, fine. So, can a single cell petition for rights?
Same for the Seuss quote: is a single cell a person? is every one of my cells a person? are my sperms millions of people?
No offense taken whatsoever 🤝
Assume you do not live in Cambodia.


