32
FreeManSamsara
32997031b2b6a1bde409d139c66a6597376220b8a7766c12e21c8cc9712d854a
Peace Love Bitcoin

Why aren't more people talking about comet 3I/Atlas on Nostr? So many unexpected characteristics, the anti tail when entering the SS, the nickel content, the enormous size, the path along the elliptic, swinging so close by 3 planets, no images from mars due to govt shut down, planetary defense network activated, tail away from sun now that it's approaching perihelion, perihelion obfuscated by sun. Two major Ai' coming out with browsers called "Comet" and "Atlas". Its like the AIs are trying to tell us something.

What news sources do you nostriches like?

Does anyone know how to fix my latest feed in primal? It never loads. All the other feeds load fine.

Just trying out GrapheneOS. Seems to beworkings alright with Amethyst, not so much with primal.

I am not yet free, I still have debts to pay. But I am freer than many, and for that I am grateful.

I find it hard to focus on daily living because thoughts about Bitcoin, 3i/atlas, AI, quantum computing, fusion power, higher consciousness all swirl in my head every free moment. It feels as though we're on the cusp of multiple singlularity events.

Replying to Avatar Nate of Earth

Discussing privacy and blockchains, I have a new type of social and data blockchain currently at 90pc development and any to get your thoughts on privacy. All tx's are stored open and transparent on a blockchain each tx is a complete block itself unlike #bitcoin and other #crypto blockchains.

Example flow.

Alice creates a profile genesis tx she includes a description and 2 pictures, first picture is permanent profile picture(avatar or real photo of self) and a verification picture with a piece of paper with date and id (16 letters and numbers) for example nate123456789000, 2 other users have to verify your profile by posting a comment to your profile linking it through the linkage key. Once two people verify you are a real person and not a bot(enemy of all democracy platforms) then you have full access to post in all parts and become a verified voting participant.

Now with a verified profile you are able to vote and post.

So Alice finds a proposal that people are voting on and submits a "yes" vote and posts her thoughts about the proposal for example "I read the proposal and agree with Bob we should have free internet for all citizens"

This is both her concensus vote AND opinion of what she thought, now this is a tx like all others so if John is subscribed to Alice in Johns feed he sees her yes vote, initial proposal details and her opinion, this makes John agree with the proposal and Alice and in the same interface John votes yes aswel and the linkage continues propergatimg votes and discussion automatically throughout the system ,personal feed. Now if Tim isn't that interested in democracy he can customise his feed to exclude vote tx's and proposal tx's from his feed entirely we have over 512 customisable tags PER feed! Democratic transparency is the price of privacy.

Since all users are verified and their profile is law. Technically if the real world identity is exposed then users or governments can trace all tx's and punish for illegal content but that's what we have a digital constitution for people vote on completely new rules and regulations from scratch and users agree on the platforms new rules, so if you people vote on content policies you need an majority 75pc to agree to modify the constitution. This is a complete revolution as we have never had Any system of governance like this before.

Think of each proposal as a referendum that all participants vote on and discuss in real time and the backend takes care of concensus automatically approving and denied proposals.

So, what do you all think about #privacy what's the pros and cons of true privacy let's discuss while I'm still developing my platform and would you leave old legacy platforms behind like #nostr #x #facebook for true decentralised transparent blockchain based governance and blockchain based platform all in one.

Peace and harmony to all who read this.

Peace

Nate ✌️

Will votes include something like zaps? Committing real money to something you vote for is a way to actually give your energy toward a cause, not just lip service.

Imagine if 3i/Atlas makes a maneuver when it's on the far side of the sun that sets it in to a decaying orbit that collides with the earth in say 100 years. If humanity can unite to develop the technology to avert disaster, we reap the metal deposit resources of the comet. If we fail, humanity is annihilated. 🤔🤔

In 2021 I got wrapped up in the GameStop short squeeze, made a couple thousand dollars. But what I really got out of it was education. Clearly it was a lesson in how the fiat/bitcoin collision will play out. Sometimes I wonder if the whole thing was engineered just to teach that lesson. I wonder the same thing about Doge coin. Looks like it was engineered to teach a lesson.

Replying to Avatar Nate of Earth

I've been designing a next-gen blockchain platform and made some controversial

choices. Looking for honest feedback from the crypto community.

## Core Design Principles:

**What's DIFFERENT:**

- ❌ No blocks (individual transaction propagation)

- ❌ No mining (Byzantine consensus via random node verification)

- ❌ No cryptocurrency tokens (zero economic incentives)

- ✅ Quantum-resistant signatures (future-proof cryptography)

- ✅ ONE account per human (enforced for democracy)

- ✅ Direct democracy governance (citizens vote on platform changes)

**The Goal:** Create a social/governance platform where 5 billion humans can

participate in direct democracy with true "one person, one vote" - no plutocracy,

no mining pools controlling consensus, no whales manipulating votes with tokens.

## The Trade-offs I'm Wrestling With:

### 1. **Privacy vs Accountability**

To prevent vote manipulation, all transactions are PUBLIC (like Bitcoin).

You get a pseudonymous username, but your voting history is transparent.

- **Pro:** No secret vote buying, provable democratic consensus

- **Con:** Your political views are permanently public

**Question:** Is radical transparency worth the privacy loss? Or does this

create a surveillance dystopia?

### 2. **One Account Per Person**

To achieve "one person one vote," I enforce ONE identity per human. You can't

create multiple accounts to spam votes.

- **Pro:** Prevents Sybil attacks, enables true democracy

- **Con:** Can't separate work/personal identities, no "burner accounts"

**Question:** Is enforcing single identity too authoritarian? Or necessary

for democratic integrity?

### 3. **Permanent Immutability**

Once you post something, it's permanent. Forever. No edits, no deletions.

- **Pro:** Historical truth preserved, no censorship or revisionism

- **Con:** Youthful mistakes haunt you forever, violates GDPR "right to be forgotten"

**Question:** Should people have the right to erase their past? Or does

democracy require permanent accountability?

### 4. **No Economic Incentives**

Nodes run altruistically (like Wikipedia editors or Tor volunteers). No mining

rewards, no staking yields, no token speculation.

- **Pro:** Pure democratic participation, no profit motive corrupting governance

- **Con:** Will people actually run nodes without financial gain?

**Question:** Can a blockchain survive without economic incentives? Or am I

being naive about human nature?

## What I'm NOT Building:

- Not a DeFi platform (no smart contracts)

- Not a currency (no tokens to trade)

- Not a corporate project (open-source, community-governed)

- Not trying to compete with Bitcoin/Ethereum (different purpose entirely)

## What I AM Building:

A democratic social network where:

- Governments can't censor you

- Corporations can't ban you

- Wealthy users can't buy more influence

- Your vote counts exactly as much as anyone else's

## My Questions For You:

1. **Privacy:** Would you use a platform where your votes are public forever?

2. **Identity:** Is "one account per person" too restrictive?

3. **Incentives:** Would you run a node altruistically (costs ~$50/month)?

4. **Governance:** Would you trust direct democracy over representative democracy?

I know this sounds idealistic. Maybe too idealistic. But I'm genuinely curious

if there's a community that wants this, or if I'm solving a problem nobody has.

**Honest criticism welcome.** Tell me why this will fail. I want to stress-test

these ideas before building something nobody wants.

---

**TL;DR:** Building a blockchain with no blocks, no mining, no coins - just

direct democracy and radical transparency. Is this revolutionary or just naive?

Noble intent, all people have equal voting rights with inviolable voting laws. I like the concept, I'm not sure how it would work out. Some apathetic voters equal to well informed voters. I suppose the motivated voters would work to inform/coerce the apathetic ones. And perhaps apathy wins once policy effects are experienced. I feel "voting with your wallet" is very effective, especially in a free market. If all votes are equally weighed, this effect may be lost.