Both are just corporate branding for trust smuggling in lightning swaps
You're right in that it's technically less than 2.1Q, but that's because there are no decimal places even to halve 1 sat at the last reward epoch. Sat is the actual unit technically, not a whole coins.
They're as susceptible to the game theory as anyone else and will stand beside us in keeping sats rare ;)
I don't follow you on that one, the supply is 2.1 quadrillion sats, not 21M bitcoin, so there's no inconsistency with the denomination. All 2.1Q sats can be dispersed (dust is a separate issue)
> never will be
This is the key point, its not just adding more decimals, its that we don't have decimals at all.. period... so a consensus fork to say millisats is a defacto supply increase and breaks not just consensus but every shell app that has to do any account whatsover.
So yea, it'll never happen.
You're right, muffed a ^M... it should be closer to a billion people, point remains we've no chance at being tx bound
Great news everyone, the scaling debate is over, Bitcoin has ossified! 
Bitcoin's "scaling" limitations are not a function of it's throughput, but rather how many people or organizations will actually be able to afford the 5-6 digits worth of sats needed to not have to trust anybody.
The role of a central bank is to provide a foreign power the means to steal from an otherwise sovereign nation without direct military conflict through seigniorage and usury.
You're referring to a state bank, which is different from a central bank.
Full throttle on a dystopian nightmare doesn’t “even need the CBDC, fiat has a built-in kill switch.
Since fiat is a ponzi scheme, the state need only to turn off the printers. Like a game of musical chairs, when the music stops the state/bankers are the only one with a seat.
Debt service destroys money in circulation constantly, hense the constant need to print. Given that, everyone without a considerable amount of productive assets (non-fiat) ends up destitute pretty quickly.
When these destitute people have no where to turn but the state, looking for bread and housing, the state can then dis-intermediate benefits down to just a state issued pod and bug smoothies. Much more cost effective than the subsidy apparatus.”
https://stacker.news/items/881399/r/halalmoney?commentId=881541
nostr:npub1xvtwx6tduaxnn9v3y7uasskl277achgu0tu2qncmc7hdsz6y2zyqce64sa I am so glad you are one of the good guys, you are one of the good guys right?
By understanding our own capacity for darkness, we develop the wisdom to recognize and handle it in the world around us.
"The brighter the light, the darker the shadow."
We've got our own protocol that addresses things NWC doesn't, but could probably add an adapter for it in Pub
I'm focused on people that have no idea what nostr is and/or don't care, that's the 99.9% of people/companies on the internet not using it.
They don't necessarily want email/passkeys, but they expect it. They can't benefit from Nostr until they're met where they are.
What's a user? A unique key? An "install"? Visitor? Payment?
The only correct answer is not enough.
The only KPI is revenue
Bias selection, How many didn't use it at all? or simply lose their keys eventually? not return? not use nostr cross-device?
Nostr is still irrelevant, the status quo is nothing to celebrate
Dual use, regular users just want email/passkey auth and it can do that too
Signer apps miss the point entirely, its team members and external services need an access controller... Large companies and brands can't bring their value to nostr otherwise
Funny you should ask... this scavenges events proactively in the background and caches into SQL for usable performance across multiple devices
