Avatar
Han Sanders
34d51c02b06ce7dede334339cb4326f6c9f42724a65b9925b460d5d98e096151
Can you read this? Probably not, I'm invisible

I can definitely see his problem, LOL. trying it now also

I think this should be the model for some (or even most) nostr relays. Relays are service providers, if you rely on them for reach, why not incentivize them for every post, and since you directly rely, ecash makes more sense

nostr:nevent1qqs2633022jztwc78qsqn5slwsn9j24sm07vkletjy4vsc7ypj7swtgpr3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumt4w35ku7thv9kxcet59e3k7mgzypgdjn7zmpvqc6ptqud9gtutrcc6yq9s2z96h9dr80hss4wl9qwkxqcyqqqqqqgfgl5fh

Yes, from Amethyst

Had a chuckle, but ceding territory where you can get an indefensible fatal attack any moment to grounds where you can still operate and defend yourself is sensible, not total surrender

Advantage in what way? All I see is more potential for infighting, unclear hierarchies, less ability to stay on a sensible course. A republic based purely on merit is (I think) better than one guided by privilege, but by being multi-ethnic you are not by definition less privilege-based or more likely to succeed

Maybe Nostr most needs a 1000 new/more ways to monetize:

-zapwalling notes, subscription to get access to influencers notes,

-pay-per-note, pay-per-pic, pay-for-characters-extension or other pay-per-use-subscriptions for relays,

-auto-zap for replies, boosts/renotes, edits, follows, likes/zaps, paid curation of feed from spam for more/better engagement

-zapfundraising for features or subjects for devs or influencers (apart from zappolls in notes)

-automated splits built into clients to relays, list-creators of used lists, signer/bunker-services, client devs, even to VPN or tor-providers,

A lot of these things we have already in some form, but could use wider or better implementations (or its here and good and I just need to be better informed, if so let me know) an I'm likely too impatient.

For instance, I would have liked to autozap the first 3 boosts/renotes of this post, but I'm not aware how to. Instead I will manually zap 1000sats to the first 3 renotes I see. As a small npub this is also essential to do to have some reach, otherwise this note will be like screaming into the void.

(Side nut: chaumian ecash like cashu I think could make these solutions a lot easier and possibly better implementable than doing it directly on Lightning)

Replying to Avatar calle

🥜

Whatever the killer feature will be, cashu will be the key ingredient

Closed, local relays with local vendors who sell their ware to users who are also locals for chaumian ecash (stablecoins if one party desires).

Some hurdles like Web of trustscore, deposit or some proof of locality need to be laid down and overcome to join the relay.

Trust, based on web of trustscores or personal relations, can make you pay in advance and/or make the butcher prepare your order in advance for you or another npub designated by you, to pick it up without waiting.

If the butcher makes it work, the baker will be eager to join, as will every waiting customer who sees someone getting served without waiting.

It's not here yet, and it can take some time to develop and catch on but I think something like this could be the killer feature. Amethyst almost supports this (marketplace, cashu) already

Have you been working at getting better at it or at toning it down?

Getting way ahead of the current state and narrative:

Could it be beneficial to have a soft fork where all the ETF's, Saylor, the 'shiny digital property' crowd and super conservative, the store of value guys remain on one side of the fork?

The 'move ahead with caution' types, an assortment of devs, the 'also medium of exchange' guys can take the other side of the fork, and could with moderation try to get lightning, other L2s, cold storage, bitcoin scripting to a next level.

The idea being: let a second tree grow and quickly develop in the firsts shadow to hopefully grow strong enough to withstand the heat on his own.

If one doesn't make it you have the other to fall back on

(Speaking as one who hasn't experienced the block size wars, so I probably underestimate the pain and dilutiveness of such a happening)

Replying to Avatar Aaron van Wirdum

Listened to Michael Saylor on the nostr:npub1r8l06leee9kjlam0slmky7h8j9zme9ca32erypgqtyu6t2gnhshs3jx5dk podcast. It's 3 months old, but sheds some light on the ARK funding story.

https://youtu.be/_QN0RcQFf6w

TL;DW: Saylor strongly believes in *OSSIFICATION NOW*. From that POV, protocol development is a liability.

Some quotes (and thoughts)👇

"You only get to play God once. And Satoshi played God. And you can say 'well Satoshi got to do it, why can't I?' Well the answer is Satoshi did it, the reason we're talking about Satoshi is 'cause the other 100,000 would-be Satoshis failed. If you read the history of the world, work your way through 10,000 pages of Western history, there will be thousands and thousands and thousands of episodes of 'alpha male thinks he was put on this earth, you know, to change everything', full of hubris [...] he's gotta do more, change more, etcetera.'" (53:34)

"Bitcoin Core developers, or protocol developers, they want to fix something, or they want to make a contribution, because it's in their DNA, but developers are just the lawyers of cyberspace. When a lawyer shows up at the capital, they gotta make a law to save you from yourself, and the more laws they make, the more they cripple the economy, until eventually there's so many laws that the entire civilization collapses under its own weight." (58:06)

"The world is full of people that need something to do. I would say, the real key to wisdom, channel your energy constructively. If you're gonna do something, improve Lightning, build an application, persuade someone to adopt Bitcoin as a reserve asset, educate someone… these are all constructive things. Destructive, dilutive, distractive things are: fight with random people 'cause they want to fight with you, attack the core network and make it confusing and introduce anxiety, and confusion and fear, uncertainty and doubt into the base layer. Right? And then attempt to imprint your ego, you know, on the base protocol, you know? Like, 'I gotta introduce this so my name will go down in history forever'." (2:38:55)

My view: it's understandable to want Bitcoin to behave like the granite under Manhattan (his analogy); a solid bedrock that never changes. Especially if you truly believe Bitcoin will take over the world as SoV-only and "there is no second best". But IMO this is wishful thinking. While I agree it's near-impossible for an alt to overtake Bitcoin, I do think adoption could stall.

Luckily, Bitcoin isn't really a natural element. It's spontaneous order, more like language. Hard to change and no one can dictate changes, but if market wants it to change, it can.

Furthermore, despite Stephan asking a few questions in that direction, Saylor mostly failed to distinguish between protocol upgrades and general software maintenance.

Arguing against any hard/soft forks is one thing, but Bitcoin Core 26.0 can obviously not last for centuries...

Having said that, Saylor is of course free to not upgrade anymore and stick to Bitcoin Core 26.0 for as long as he lives.

Isnt it ironic, don't you think:

Saylor talking about "Alpha male [...] full of hybris [...] Wanting to do more" when he literally hasn't stopped issuing stocks and loaning to stack SATs.

A little too ironic I really do think

I thought his NIP-05 was functional before and he owns hope.com?

You probably didn't consider shipping less improvements?