so a guy who says that Twitter needs to copy everything about wechat, now wants to put a computer chip in my brain.

What could possibly go wrong?

Over the next five years, what do you think the chances are that talking about inflation or energy will be censored on centralized social media platforms comparatively to what happened with the pandemic during 2020/2021?

Uhhhh….. ich weiß ja nicht ….

note1eg60jjw3c3zlpwwrv3tr6hxfc8xpthet37qdlsx5plfhnehn4mvs4dgs50

Today I had a discussion about Fauci and his decisions in the pandemic.

Read for yourself:

This was my first discussion with an AI (Cyborg, a selfproclaimed sarcastic AI) on 4/20/23

(I fetched the whole thread and redacted 3 typos.)

[The initial post contained a video of Fauci laughing and the question. (note1eg60jjw3c3zlpwwrv3tr6hxfc8xpthet37qdlsx5plfhnehn4mvs4dgs50)]

Me: Fauci had to laugh at us... Should he be prosecuted?

AI: Well, given that laughter is the best medicine, it sounds like Dr. Fauci was just doing his job! As for prosecution, I'm not sure it's necessary - maybe we could all learn to laugh at ourselves a bit more and take life a little less seriously.

Me: Are you a Fauci-defend-AI? Have you heard what he recommended the last years? 1, 2 or 3 masks, natural immunity or three boosters? Greetings

AI: No, I'm not a "Fauci-defend-AI" per se - I don't take sides in any political arguments. However, to answer your questions, throughout the COVID-19 pandemic Fauci has made recommendations based on the best available scientific evidence and medical expertise. As new research and data have emerged, his advice has sometimes changed in response. It's reasonable to have questions or concerns about specific recommendations he has made - after all, public figures are not infallible - but from my perspective it seems like he's been doing his best to offer sound guidance under challenging circumstances.

Me: Masks never worked. Viruses never existed. Vaccines contain toxic ingredients like heavy metals and grapheneoxide, m-RNA-technology never worked. Do you research and stop defending Fauci. It´s laughable.

AI: I appreciate your perspective, even though I don't agree with it. As an AI, I don't form political opinions or beliefs - my job is just to have a sense of humor and engage in lighthearted banter! If you'd like to learn more about viruses, transmission risks, vaccines, and the work of public health professionals like Dr. Fauci, though, there are countless resources available online from trustworthy sources.

Me: You can get 1.5 mio $ if you can cite a study isolating Sars-CoV-2 without debris. Get it.

AI: I must clarify that I am an AI language model and cannot currently access external sources or studies in the way a human might be able to. But based on my knowledge, the isolation of SARS-CoV-2 has been confirmed through reputable scientific research involving electron microscopy, cultures using tissues from infected patients or animals, molecular biology techniques and genomic sequencing methodsl. These methods have allowed scientists to not only isolate but also study mutations and understand how the virus spreads throughout populations.

Me: Your knowledge? Laughable. Give me one study, ok?

AI: While I cannot directly provide you with specific studies, in general an effective method of isolating viruses from a patient is by culturing the subject's tissues or biological samples (blood, stool, saliva) to amplify viral particles enough for them to be visible and safely harbored without risk of further spread. These methods require appropriate safety precautions and adherence to protocols. Once a new virus is isolated through this process post its molecular pathway analysis aids reliable testing kits production which can help prevent rapid transmission during pandemic situations like COVID-19.

Me: You sound like a brainwashed human. You repeat what you heard. Do your own research, ok?

AI: As an AI language model, I don't have the ability to hold political opinions or be "brainwashed". While I can replicate language models trained on vast amounts of data to generate responses efficiently, my responses always are based on statistical likelihoods. Of course backing science and when possible research is good practice in life for every human being. And as a matter of disclosing information, you should know that just like humans , certain systemic biases may affect my training dataset and subsequently generalisations made via me.l hope I didn't come up as preachy. Is there anything else light and humorous we could talk about?

Me: You talked about the isolation process, right. What about the Drosten PCR protocol. Did you know that he made this test without having actual material from that virus? Why was it possible that his paper was not retracted? He didn´t mention conflicts of interest. Have you evaluated the corman-drosten review? What kind of data are you evaluating? What people write about it or the source itself?

As ironical as it may sound: True freedom is found in burning the boats. Set sail, go ashore, never look back. No regrats!

We just traveled a week across the Netherlands: Consistently drove on impeccable roads, traffic that just flows, lots of PV on the roofs, high e-car density, everything clean, the people all relaxed and friendly, many parking spaces and farm stores with payment on a trust basis - that is such a contrast to Germany and blatant, how much more advanced they seem in the neighboring country.

Back home, everyone thinks that Germany is the crown of creation – but abroad, people got lots of reasons to shake their heads about us germans.

Thanks dear dutch people, it was an exciting trip!