what’s interesting about your experiment, is that if i sent someone sats and they returned them, i don’t know if that is all it takes for me to “trust” them.
it’s like the experiment was able to draw out the idea that there is something more to trust, something a little deeper
exactly.
people sell investments to invest in more promising ventures.
people just spend money
AI isn’t rational, it doesn’t collate ideas without being fed order
literally everyone in the world is a philosopher. it’s how human beings get through the day.
many, like yourself, are just really bad at it
keeping a sharp blade isn’t a waste of time.
but to a point.
there is no honor in debating you.
like a toddler entering a UFC fight
look man, you are throwing around moral language without even knowing it
damage?
fabric?
the question isn’t whether a person is moralizing, the question is what is your morality based in.
you just make it up in your mind
my morality is objective and has nothing to do with me.
you really aren’t a thinker, but u could be, if u cared at all about following logic
just reflecting the absurdity you project
that hisenburg quote “The first gulp from the glass of natural sciences will turn you into an atheist, but at the bottom of the glass God is waiting for you.”
social capital is invaluable
Have you even lived if you havent experienced a goat? 🐐
that’s what fiat means: by decree.
you think reality is what you say it is
logic isn’t “mine”
but it is rather oppressive, isn’t it?
can just wish reality wasn’t so.
you live in a fiat fantasy
the silence is deafening
it’s not my first rodeo, this debate plays out one of two ways but ends up in the same place.
either you:
really mean “open”, no lines, anything goes, no morality, which logically compromises your position to say “i’m wrong”
or you:
don’t mean open, that there is some line you arbitrarily/subjectively determine, which logically compromises your position to say “i’m wrong”
you have no philosophical depth, but you could if u swallow ur ego and just follow the logic
“sexual openness”
so no lines, anything goes?
what’s hilareous is you are spouting a speculative theology without even realizing it.
you are a gnostic lunatic
belief in the flying spaghetti monster is more logically coherent than your imagination
good news is u can join us all in objective reality anytime u get around to it. the water is warm, and we will just be crushing
🥱 no retard, tilt at windmills all u want
people have been doing what they going to do for all time, and it works out the same over and over and over.
the same natural law principles that make btc the best money in the history of the world apply to other domains too.
or do you not know why btc does what btc does?
you can live in a fiat sexual world where you can do whatever without consequence, but it’s just as fake and gay as our fiat monetary world.
