Most haven't a clue. Some perfectly realize it.
I'll tell you the worst situation I've ever been in with a woman and then I have started cooking breakfast 😁👍. This girl and I dated for just over two months. This was a little over a year after I was discharged, a year and a half about, and had just moved in to my parents' house. Like, literally hadn't even finished unpacking. Then out of knowhere one night when she was over she started goin' on about buying a second car and potentially selling the house and expanding the front yard. Lol! It was honestly a bit frightening.
She didn't take it well. Had a complete mental breakdown in my kitchen. Screaming her ass off and claiming I never loved her (which was true... sorry) and a bunch other horseshit that I can't recall. It was so weird. 🤷♂️
I shouldn't have taken that brief nap earlier 😮💨. Lol.
Honestly, I can't keep up neither! 🤣😅 Because the women that I dated before enlisting were never this needy! That was way back in 2006. I was discharged in 2014.
Also, that's kinda what I was trying to hint at though. LOL!!! I agree! They aren't, in any way, in a position to demand! Female ego can be pretty off the wall these days. It can be quite scary to witness. It's no doubt a combination of excessive levels of insecurity and ego, imo.
Lol. Yea, probably.
Really?! Just 1:10000?! If that is true, then yea, it would be the best option. What about he-3?
In terms of supply, when dealing with fusion neutrons, how significant would it need to be to generate a reaction of that scale?
Fusion is certainly safer in terms of production. But, the process is far more time consuming and it has a higher potential to be cost-ineffective. Fission energy (as extremely dangerous as it is) has the potential to swiftly generate a massive amount of clean energy.
Knew it! And I'm flattered...
The same reason I just gave. There isn't enough data. There could be potential for space exploration, though perhaps we just haven't found enough evidence yet to ensure it as a certainty in any way. It's only 2024. We still have plenty of time. We might not even see it in our lifetime.
You could be right about that. There's certainly not enough publicly released data to come up with a definitive conclusion.
A billion dollars is pocket change for any nuclear power's black budget. They'll get around to it.
Luna might have the potential to be used as a resupply station. Although, generating a resource minimal supply line would be extremely challenging.
Alright, then. I see where you're goin' with this. Yea, you're right. Luna wouldn't provide anything in terms of energy or industry essential resources. Earth should be fine for quite some time, as long as we learn to properly utilize it's geothermal energy sources. Mars, most certainly, doesn't have anywhere near as much potential for geothermal energy production. Perhaps hydrothermal, though 🤔. Depends on the size of the subsurface water pockets that, most likely, lie there. You're on to something there. No doubt. Although, a long-lasting colonial population on Mars doesn't seem possible, imo.
I don't mind if I like her enough. 🤷♂️ No biggie!
I appreciate that. I just didn't want to stir up any unintentional drama. Amethyst being my first time using social media, I have noticed that many people have a tendency to be extremely sensitive to certain opinions.
No one likes a fibber!
Why waste all that time makin' your way to Jupiter? We most likely have a colonial settlement on Luna already.
More like girlfriends. My parents had a very healthy relationship, and I've observed plenty of other ones as well. Although, I feel as if I've observed an equal amount of toxic ones too.