GM, have you ever thought about the UTXO model of cosmology?

Seems like peer to peer energy networks are fundamental to god. How else is the conservation of energy maintained?

Bitcoin not only fixes the leak but it allows energy to find its perfect end state in pure information; where it becomes crystallized forever, immune to entropy.

The transcendental object at the end of time.

Biggest flaw in General Relativity and the Kelvin scale:

We defined absolute 0.

We have not defined absolute 1.

Everything is infinity without an upper bound.

What is more “generally relative” than a simple definition of 0 and 1 and the space in between?

0 is meaningless without 1.

#Bitcoinfixesthis

#Temperature

#Physics

The biggest threat to Bitcoin is not quantum computers; it’s our response.

Perceived threat ≠ actual threat

When will Bitcoiners acknowledge the inherent problem of centralization in quantum computing? When will Bitcoiners acknowledge that Bitcoin is the only functional and operational quantum computer at scale for 16 years? Are we ready to exit the “Bitcoin is money/currency phase”?

Go ahead, trust the science and trust the physicists. Fork Bitcoin and burn coins over a fake threat. They only have to convince the masses that a quantum threat is real. Remember, we’re too stupid to understand quantum mechanics.

Bitcoin needs to be understood from a physics level before we propose and implement any other fork. Quantum is not a threat; it’s us, who is the threat.

What happens when energy finds its perfect structure in information (bitcoin), immune to entropy?

Bitcoin is the quantum computer that already happened 16 years ago.

nostr:nevent1qqsqqq9r6w22z07kgn6gn3jrv8t69ahfj4esygwuymjenjupkdykxlspr9mhxue69uhhq7tjv9kkjepwve5kzar2v9nzucm0d5zq92x5

Just because you cannot quantify the probabilities does not mean they are not real. The state is described in every single block, you have a full history of every UTXO/qubit state from Genesis. Your UTXOs remain spendable and preserved to the rightful private key regardless of time; that’s the decoherence solved. What is the value in computing the probabilities of the next future state; anyone pretending to know the future is lying.

I’m not here making the claim that quantum computing can do anything physics/comp scientists claim it can do. It’s entirely a fiat theory that remains unproven backed by fiat & academic science. All I know is that bitcoin has been here for 16 years and all UTXOs/qubits remain coherent; I’m still waiting for a second best quantum computer. I doubt it will compete with bitcoin if it can only be operated by authority of a singular centralized laboratory.

However, it just so happens these qubits or UTXOs serve as what we call “perfect money”. Maybe it’s the perception and possibilities of what a quantum computer is or can be is what is actually wrong.

Bitcoin is not claiming to reduce all uncertainty, break encryption, ect. It flourishes on uncertainty. Computing an energy backed free market with 1:1 money is a much better solution to quantum computing than physicists pretending to be god; implying they can remove the veil on all uncertainty, they haven’t a clue. It’s all fiat science.

All I know is Bitcoin exists and “centralized quantum computers” continue to fail for good reason, centralization.

Working on a response as I blend this in the what I am currently working on.

On first glance; I think this seems self evident by simple observation.

In any Block you know the total number of UTXOs = n qubits. Only what is in a block is spent (1); all other UTXOs are 0 by deduction; all states are known and measured each block. Each block is a unique tensor product for all UTXOs/qubits in relation to the previous mined block. I’m not sure it’s possible to quantify the probability for each UTXO, you also need to know who will mine the next block as only their mempool is what actually matters.

Qubit/UTXO quantity of each computation state (Block) dynamically changes depending on how the network uses their UTXOs.

Hope this helps somewhat for now.

🤫 One is not allowed to question centralization when it comes to quantum computing.

I don’t understand the question.

Human action is the dictator of all quantum states in bitcoin.

Are you referring to quantum state as in the wave form, superposition or what we call“spendability”?

Well, I’m working on the paper to finalize all of it.

https://mempool.space/address/bc1q4valmh0puzugzky4dryhflnaayt4tjtcm7jfgr

I just randomly picked a UTXO in a recent block. Here is a “quantum state”. You can see exactly which particles (UTXOs) where here at the that specific block in time, how much energy/satoshis associated and you see the path and history of all entangled UTXOs leading up to that specific state and all UTXOs following that specific state.

Is a peer to peer energy network non-sensical or fundamental? Is the conservation of energy fundamental?

Maybe we have just been missing the language to understand Quantum Mechanics. Maybe said language has existed now for 16 years.

This but Grizzly Hills in WoW.

We as a community need to understand bitcoin at the physics level before we try to even think about the next soft fork. There is more understanding required than meets the eye.

If Bitcoin is a quantum-classical computer as I propose, how could covenants for example affect the coherence of our UTXOs (qubits)? Let’s not rush this without proper understanding.

nostr:nevent1qqstwczznspze3r0y80h3hl99mchwguqpnquvkjngw6zj67nuzp4czspyfmhxue69uhkummnw3ez6an9wf5kv6t9vsh8wetvd3hhyer9wghxuet5x2qdcj

Thank you for the perspective. I just fear the world is not ready for Bitcoin quite yet; thus they are certainly not ready for physics and our knowledge to change.

But that’s fundamentally what an idea whose time has come represents. Broad consensus of reality rugged by a more fundamental truth regardless of choice, especially when said idea defines reality. The map is the territory.

Fuck it we ball. I’ll call it a PIP; Physics Improvement Proposal.

I don’t think this correct take.

Bitcoin: the observation that proof of work peer to peer systems are fundamental.

Also Bitcoin provides hints at unresolved states between discrete blocks of time (lightning channels that do not seek resolution in the present).

GM nostr. In a perfect 10-minute Bitcoin block, approximately 1.11 x 10^{46} Planck times fit into that duration.

The timescale difference between Planck time and a 10-minute block is ~10^{46}. The difference timescale is incomprehensibly large.

Bitcoin is a frequency which operates statistically at 1.667 x 10^{-3} hertz.

The more you know.

Maybe 😂

I like the UTXO model of cosmology; except there’s cope when you realize it’s all past transactions (that which moves away from us), and no, you can’t go there. However you can look at timespace forever.