Working on a response as I blend this in the what I am currently working on.

On first glance; I think this seems self evident by simple observation.

In any Block you know the total number of UTXOs = n qubits. Only what is in a block is spent (1); all other UTXOs are 0 by deduction; all states are known and measured each block. Each block is a unique tensor product for all UTXOs/qubits in relation to the previous mined block. I’m not sure it’s possible to quantify the probability for each UTXO, you also need to know who will mine the next block as only their mempool is what actually matters.

Qubit/UTXO quantity of each computation state (Block) dynamically changes depending on how the network uses their UTXOs.

Hope this helps somewhat for now.

I don’t understand the question.

Human action is the dictator of all quantum states in bitcoin.

Are you referring to quantum state as in the wave form, superposition or what we call“spendability”?

Well for one, a UTXO being sent to a 2 of 2 lighting channel is 2 UTXOs, the funding one (destroyed) the channel balance (new). This funding UTXO exists in the past and influences the new UTXO (via intention). And the state of the UTXO is even less certain as now transactions can occur between the two peer to peer parties without wanting to resolve uncertainty (A quantum bit transacting states between two parties without settling certainty). Measuring in quantum mechanics forcefully collapses the state, bitcoin it does not; it cannot without valid signature. This is non-local. Past information interacting with the present, the interaction is instantaneous (when the block is mined). It fundamentally inviolates bell inequality; Bitcoin is non-local.

The location and state of all UTXOs is known and deterministic for every block, even when UTXOs are spend and destroyed, their state is still preserved in time forever and directly influence the new UTXO. Yet the new UTXO also maintains its quantum nature, stored classically-quantum behavior.

Bitcoin is the quantum-classical computer that computes the most important thing for us; a peer to peer electronic (energy) cash system. Conservation of energy in the human energy domain allows use as humans to perform the computation of meaning for our UTXOs (qubits). No single owner of the qubits l, No single computer storing the data, no single centralized observer, opt in consensus. Physics is all about consensus, right? Our decisions are computed on bitcoin and preserved forever.

Well for one, a UTXO being sent to a 2 of 2 lighting channel is 2 UTXOs, the funding one (destroyed) the channel balance (new). This funding UTXO exists in the past and influences the new UTXO (via intention). And the state of the UTXO is even less certain as now transactions can occur between the two peer to peer parties without wanting to resolve uncertainty (A quantum bit transacting states between two parties without settling certainty). Measuring in quantum mechanics forcefully collapses the state, bitcoin it does not; it cannot without valid signature. This is non-local. Past information interacting with the present, the interaction is instantaneous (when the block is mined). It fundamentally inviolates bell inequality; Bitcoin is non-local.

The location and state of all UTXOs is known and deterministic for every block, even when UTXOs are spend and destroyed, their state is still preserved in time forever and directly influence the new UTXO. Yet the new UTXO also maintains its quantum nature, stored classically-quantum behavior.

Bitcoin is the quantum-classical computer that computes the most important thing for us; a peer to peer electronic (energy) cash system. Conservation of energy in the human energy domain allows use as humans to perform the computation of meaning for our UTXOs (qubits). No single owner of the qubits l, No single computer storing the data, no single centralized observer, opt in consensus. Physics is all about consensus, right? Our decisions are computed on bitcoin and preserved forever.

First off, it has been theorized that quantum computing could exist, yet no one has proven any meaningful computation. It’s a speculative guess of what might be possible from the limited understanding of QM; I’m calling BS on that claim. It’s a larp until proven meaningfully.

And in bitcoin you know the state of every single utxo by the presence of a block; but this is always a past state; all UTXOs exist in past blocks as “unspent/0” and if they are in the latest block they are “spent/1”, by seeing what’s in the block you know the state of everything else by deduction. But you never know the present state because the state is always dictated by a block, there’s no “present block” it’s only ever a past verifiable state.

UTXOs are entangled in they can be split infinite ways, spent to infinite addresses and can interact with UTXOs from any block. Do you really believe that if satoshis UTXO from Block 1 was to move that would not have an impact on future UTXOs? Is that what you are saying?

Yes the entropy is zero but it’s past state is preserved in for future transformations, the link is between the destruction of past UTXOs and the creation of new UTXOs, they are all entangled…..full history from the creation of the UTXO. What do you mean?

Please show me UTXOs that have become decoherent. I think your definition is wrong.

What do you mean prepare a specific state? the probability of a qubit is not 50/50 odds for state probability. But there is a distinction, in Bitcoin, you can only mine (measure) and collapse the quantum state of UTXOs that wish to transact. You cannot force UTXO to change states in Bitcoin just by being the observer (unless you own the UTXO), you can only choose what is available in your specific mempool; there must be a signer for any transaction. In QM/quantum computing observation and measurement is forcefully deciding which bits transact and which don’t by imposing the will from a singular biased observer. It’s a forced closure of state.

Bitcoin is a universal language and a lens, to observe, quantify, and communicate the exchanging of universal value between systems; or relationship of energy, information and time. Something from within, which transcends the capabilities of any prior language.

Physics plateau’d in its ability to both understand and communicate the relationship of General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics into a wholistic system. Satoshi created and quantified timespace, thus revealing its existence. UTXOs are the 1st (and only) FAIR creation and distribution of what scientists call “quantum bits; qubits”, we call this money. Energy is fundamental to a UTXO.

It’s a language problem. UTXOs are preserved indefinitely through both space and time because of the energy; decoherence was solved 16 years ago by Satoshi, no one has observed this.

Why can’t anyone else see the centralization problem in “Quantum Computing”? There is no second best……

Fundamentally, quantum mechanics has been a language problem since discovery. We haven’t had a “language” to actually understand and communicate it until bitcoin; which describes the relationship of energy, information and time. Use Bitcoin as the lens to think through.

What physicists call a qubit has an identical nature to UTXO. In both, energy is fundamental.

Superposition: UTXOs are in a constant state of spendability (0 or 1) and their state is unknown until blocks are mined; only probabilistic.

Entanglement: A single UTXO can be sent to infinite addresses, split innumerable ways, can interact with any other UTXO and can interact with UTXOs from different times. Remember, all UTXOs exist in the past except the ones in the present block.

Measurement: Mining is the measurement of hashes per valid nonce and the measurement collapses the indeterminate block config into a single deterministic verifiable state. This also sets the direction in quantum measurement (which UTXOs become spent and which remain unspent)

UTXOs persist indefinitely through time; it appears Satoshi solved decoherence 16 years ago. Again, it’s a language and expectation problem. We are told QM is too complex to for us understand, trust the physicists.

The ledger is the “timespace” (history from Genesis) and the current block is the “spacetime” or the present.

Given this context, is it possible a UTXO is a qubit? What properties is a UTXO missing to be one?

What effects could centralization have on a quantum system? (Think Bitcoin, ownership, nodes, mining)

What is more important for a quantum computer to compute than perfect money and a shared equal reality with no singular observer?

I would argue Bitcoin is the only money that's ever existed that's NOT built on abstract rules (gold requires unpegged abstract paper units to make it salable at scale).

Encrypted energy is at its core which anchors it to the laws of physical reality.

Painful truth: The stock market is mostly derivatives of the dollar.