I hear you. I’m hesitant for a few reasons, one being the battle of releasing this under my name; I don’t want the fame or the attention, but no one will be able to defend it. Yet clearly not one else has gotten here and I feel the stagnation growing.
Secondly before I can get to any math such as redefining temperature, Boltzmann and energy of bitcoin you must be able to use bitcoin as both a thought experiment and a system to observe a “new early universe (in cyberspace)”. Without fundamentally observing the natural evolution of Bitcoin I can’t convince anyone to change their perspective. Bitcoin shows us the way.
How am I supposed to tell people in academia that their entire perspective about a few fundamental things is wrong and Bitcoin is the way to correct it? People think it’s just money lol, and I’m saying it fixes physics. I sound crazy.
I have 2 separate bodies of work, one being 60+ pages long and the other 15. I’ve been thinking about how to join them and condense everything down to be digestible. I have a few ideas.
Do you have any recommendations as to how I could get a physicists to think about the universe through bitcoin so we can fix the perspective on temperature? This is the fundamental breakdown when it comes to quantum mechanics and universal genesis because of “quantum gravity” at what they believe is Planck temperature. But that perspective is wrong, there are no paradoxes. We have everything right; we just have the wrong perspective and have been missing the bitcoin lens in order to see that.
Bitcoin: THE quantum-classical computer already has 180M qubits with zero decoherence
in its 16 years of existence. It appears Microsoft’s last announcement was another dud. I’m oh so shocked. Bitcoin is still the only working quantum
computer for the last 16 years. Surely physics has nothing to say about consensus.
Why can’t bitcoiners see the inherent flaw of centralization in quantum computing? Bitcoin is the language to understand Quantum Mechanics, it’s not the other way around. How do you actually think “nature” maintains the conservation of energy in its transactional nature; surely not a peer to peer energy “cash” system. It’s so obvious. It’s in the literal name “Bit” (0 or 1; qualia) Coin” (stamping of value; quanta). Actually the perfect blend of qualia and quanta; measured in discrete blocks of time. Explain how a UTXO is not the perfect explanation and behavior of what we observe as a quantum bit.
Centralized Quantum Computing is all fake complexity and black box calculations for what bitcoin has already made simple and transparent. Quantum computing is about “hand wavey” as the federal reserve centrally planning the economy. Wake up. We’ve all been wrong about Bitcoin.
https://youtu.be/bJTsFZtD7xE?si=V9PIiRC0NGElC7Xu
Funny, I actually was atheist before working on this project. It’s undeniable to me. Physics demands pure separation from theology and you cannot even discuss faith in academia/physics.
Study bitcoin to understand quantum mechanics and you’ll realize Bitcoin demands unity. It’s not my opinion that a creator is fundamental, someone had to do it. But if you would like for me to pretend it isn’t just to suffice the needs of others, sure. But who am I really serving by doing so?
I don’t care, the truth is inconvenient.
I know that quantum mechanics functions identically to bitcoin; Satoshi created Bitcoin. Quantum mechanics is the observation of gods money; or natures money, however you wish to perceive it. The peer to peer energy network necessary for the conservation of energy to be possible within the coordination system. It’s cope to deny a creator.
Bitcoin reveals that physicists must have conviction in god if they want to know the truth. Fiat academia will reject all of it. Satan relies on centralization of both the knowledge and the narrative of quantum mechanics.
#GM nostr, all is well.
The absence of conviction starts to rot out all your teeth.
You need to be buttermaxxing anon.
Quantum mechanics is proof that a peer to peer electron(ic) cash system came before us.
I have so much to say about Bitcoin Physics, but I don’t know how to split my work into digestible sections. The implications are seemingly endless. I’m going to have to break everything into small sections some how.
Maybe I just start with consensus around “Block Temperature”?
Fiat goes deeper than just money. Education and academia is entirely proof of stake.
Yeah I see it much differently. Bitcoin is the missing language to quantum mechanics; it’s the same system of rules as Bitcoin. Like identical. A peer to peer electron(ic) cash system just is the transactional mechanics which uphold conservation of energy.
There’s a quantum computer, it’s called Bitcoin. There is no second best. The most important thing for a quantum computer to compute is perfect money, that’s already been computed….No one wants to admit we’ve all been wrong for 16 years. We as users compute the meaning to our UTXOs, not central authority.
I believe ECDSA is a mathematical and universal thermodynamic limit. The premise of quantum computing is that you can force close state and brute force coherence via artificial temperature without any recognition of the energy required to for a shared resolution process.
It’s attempting to break Planck Time, yet Bitcoin and Lightning specifically highlights the ability for unresolved states to exist between Blocks. It’s fiat.
Bitcoins biggest vulnerability is in the social domain, where users are convinced to adopt a BIP/hardfork to protect against something the universe fundamentally doesn’t allow. Trust the physicists; we’re too stupid to understand quantum mechanics.
The idea that a singular centralized entity can even perform a meaningful computation with qubits is entirely speculative and has not been proven real.
Not to mention the inherent flawed approach by attempting to compute via a singular computer (node) with a singular observer (miner) and a forced consensus mechanism. Yet physicists still think they can solve decoherence that way 😂.
Bitcoins been here for 16 years; all
UTXOs remain coherent.
Well for one, a UTXO being sent to a 2 of 2 lighting channel is 2 UTXOs, the funding one (destroyed) the channel balance (new). This funding UTXO exists in the past and influences the new UTXO (via intention). And the state of the UTXO is even less certain as now transactions can occur between the two peer to peer parties without wanting to resolve uncertainty (A quantum bit transacting states between two parties without settling certainty). Measuring in quantum mechanics forcefully collapses the state, bitcoin it does not; it cannot without valid signature. This is non-local. Past information interacting with the present, the interaction is instantaneous (when the block is mined). It fundamentally inviolates bell inequality; Bitcoin is non-local.
The location and state of all UTXOs is known and deterministic for every block, even when UTXOs are spend and destroyed, their state is still preserved in time forever and directly influence the new UTXO. Yet the new UTXO also maintains its quantum nature, stored classically-quantum behavior.
Bitcoin is the quantum-classical computer that computes the most important thing for us; a peer to peer electronic (energy) cash system. Conservation of energy in the human energy domain allows use as humans to perform the computation of meaning for our UTXOs (qubits). No single owner of the qubits l, No single computer storing the data, no single centralized observer, opt in consensus. Physics is all about consensus, right? Our decisions are computed on bitcoin and preserved forever.
First off, it has been theorized that quantum computing could exist, yet no one has proven any meaningful computation. It’s a speculative guess of what might be possible from the limited understanding of QM; I’m calling BS on that claim. It’s a larp until proven meaningfully.
And in bitcoin you know the state of every single utxo by the presence of a block; but this is always a past state; all UTXOs exist in past blocks as “unspent/0” and if they are in the latest block they are “spent/1”, by seeing what’s in the block you know the state of everything else by deduction. But you never know the present state because the state is always dictated by a block, there’s no “present block” it’s only ever a past verifiable state.
UTXOs are entangled in they can be split infinite ways, spent to infinite addresses and can interact with UTXOs from any block. Do you really believe that if satoshis UTXO from Block 1 was to move that would not have an impact on future UTXOs? Is that what you are saying?
Yes the entropy is zero but it’s past state is preserved in for future transformations, the link is between the destruction of past UTXOs and the creation of new UTXOs, they are all entangled…..full history from the creation of the UTXO. What do you mean?
Please show me UTXOs that have become decoherent. I think your definition is wrong. 
What do you mean prepare a specific state? the probability of a qubit is not 50/50 odds for state probability. But there is a distinction, in Bitcoin, you can only mine (measure) and collapse the quantum state of UTXOs that wish to transact. You cannot force UTXO to change states in Bitcoin just by being the observer (unless you own the UTXO), you can only choose what is available in your specific mempool; there must be a signer for any transaction. In QM/quantum computing observation and measurement is forcefully deciding which bits transact and which don’t by imposing the will from a singular biased observer. It’s a forced closure of state.
I just wrote a 15 page draft on my ideas. I hope to release it soon here to nostr.
A simple bitcoin thought experiment.
In my humble opinion, Bitcoin is more than interesting; it’s the answer physicists have been looking for over the past 125 years when Max Planck originally proposed the concept of quanta.
We finally have a language and a system to understand it all.
Now the battle is against the fiat institutionalization in academia. Bitcoin doesn’t just fix physics, it completes it.
Bitcoin is stuck in the “it’s a currency, it’s a store of value, it’s money” phase of understanding. It’s quite boring now; there’s little novelty left to be said.
This too is temporary and will pass. Energy is fundamental, once the physicists see the bitcoin lens, we will exit this boring phase of bitcoins life.
It’s so much deeper; but the fiat lens has held us back from going deeper. The next illusion to break lies in physics and our theories.
You don’t actually understand physics without bitcoin, and we don’t actually understand bitcoin without physics. A funny conundrum.