Ok. I'm here. Now, how does this work 🤔

TIL there’s actually a limit to the number of custom reaction emojis Amethyst allows you to use based on the fact that it doesn’t allow you to scroll when the screen is filled.

Phoenix Wallet now supports buying inbound Liquidity

#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=864x1920&blurhash=%5B35E%7EmWA8wog.ARje7ozD%25M%7C%25Lt7I9NG%25iofrnWBXpjYrBayyFoJ%3D_aeXUof%25gj%5Bs8j%5DTLt7ZzR*&x=33954e2d44238f58348a88d521307f41d6bab3c6131b2938c24c0eaddd65442e

I hear you but 2% of women in a supposed civilised modern world seems pretty high to me.

Fuck yeah. Finally!

Will watch it later after work for sure 👍

Peasant normies don't even get zapped for shitposts

hfsp

#Hodl

Fuck me

Let's try this... 😋

cashuAeyJ0b2tlbiI6W3sibWludCI6Imh0dHBzOi8vbnV0cy5zZW1pc29sLmRldiIsInByb29mcyI6W3siaWQiOiJVVDVuWHVaWmxGTmIiLCJhbW91bnQiOjIsInNlY3JldCI6Ik5qZjMxVFdSM1QzUFA4V0pJN09VT3MzREpidFVpQnpyWkxKT1Y0OFRhbHM9IiwiQyI6IjAzZjk2NGQ0Y2IzYjUxZWQ4NjcwMjBmYjkzMWI5NTAwYTA0YzYzNGZlMWM2ZjI1YzI2ZWEwMjBhMzI3YzFmODlhMyJ9LHsiaWQiOiJVVDVuWHVaWmxGTmIiLCJhbW91bnQiOjE2LCJzZWNyZXQiOiJtdTRFWURBeVFxeWp0b3IvRDRUNk94R0s5VVdCY1RQUnFQdXpQZjJxd0JjPSIsIkMiOiIwMmVkZDYxZjYwNDRkZmM0YmY2MmMwZGQ5ZTVlNDMzZmY2M2U5YTA2Yzc4ODE4Njk4YmI4MDhlNTg4ZWRjYTIwMTkifSx7ImlkIjoiVVQ1blh1WlpsRk5iIiwiYW1vdW50IjozMiwic2VjcmV0IjoiTUtLSVRvZDN4aXUxa0Vma0dmSkVWVHNlc2FXbmlCcUNydTNXS3hsY2VZST0iLCJDIjoiMDM1NmIxOTgzMmY1MGI5Mzc1NGJmZDQxZDQ4ZjlhMjk5Y2RlZmIxNzdjYTY0OTMwY2FkZTVmZDJjY2FiZGUzOTc0In1dfV0sIm1lbW8iOiJUaGlzIGlzIGVOdXRzISJ9

Just #Amethyst 0.82.1 things

cashuAeyJ0b2tlbiI6W3sibWludCI6Imh0dHBzOi8vbGVnZW5kLmxuYml0cy5jb20vY2FzaHUvYXBpL3YxL0FwdEROQUJOQlh2OGdwdXl3aHg2TlYiLCJwcm9vZnMiOlt7ImlkIjoiT3k3RnVGRGFzaHpvIiwiYW1vdW50Ijo0LCJzZWNyZXQiOiJpSWx2ZHZ4RDJ1dDhySmQrOHVibkN0OG15dC9nazVVeWpDQjBwWW5hM1U4PSIsIkMiOiIwM2U4YjhlNGYwYjNiMGZiNjk3OWMwYTkxMWE5NzQ4MTJhNWQ2Y2YwOGEyMzI2YTVjZWFmMWFmNDVhNTFkYTQ3MDYifSx7ImlkIjoiT3k3RnVGRGFzaHpvIiwiYW1vdW50IjozMiwic2VjcmV0IjoiNmxhSjltNWgwd1lZcFlKM0xzY1RTang1Z3JDUHdyUk90MjVUaW5tcnROOD0iLCJDIjoiMDMyNWU4MTY3Y2EwN2Q3YjUwMmFjZDVkYzU1MmY3NzA3MTE3YjY3NzlkOWY0NmYyMTgzN2EyZmE4N2U3MzBiMGQ2In0seyJpZCI6Ik95N0Z1RkRhc2h6byIsImFtb3VudCI6NjQsInNlY3JldCI6IkN1emlWbXNHamEwRTFpVTJJZkNZeUlwWDBZU0pieCt2UFhmNlc1Zzh6VEU9IiwiQyI6IjAzYzZiMzIxYTJmOGY4MTNiM2JkMzhmOWZiMWI1OGU4OWUyZDE3NWNlMmM2ZjNmMzFjYzIyMDI0NTMwYTA5ZWU4MyJ9XX1dLCJtZW1vIjoiU2VudCB2aWEgZU51dHMuIn0

With respect, while I don’t think the 80 byte OP_RETURN thing should actually be filtered because it’s a lot point by now, there IS a critically important difference between filtering and censoring in this context:

• One is a question of WHAT is allowed in the bitcoin chain, which is a universal policy. Every node does this and this is similar to arguments with RBF and the like. In a sense, this is the only thing bitcoin does, is filter with extreme prejudice, WHAT goes into the chain.

— there is an argument to be had on whether the byte issue is good/bad, but it’s not censoring privacy transactions or coinjoins. It’s a filter that *happens* to catch one kind.

• The other is a question of WHO gets into the blockchain. F2Pool here had the audacity to claim that a certain address, with a certain balance, is owned by some “evil” people because some govt body, without trial or due process, has declared their evil acts and demanded punishment & eviction from market activities.

Regardless of whether this particular kind of filtering should be considered good, or that it potentially sets a bad precedent, they are not the same thing in terms of the danger and subjectivity of the decisions.

Deciding WHAT goes into the chain is a process of defining the bitcoin system, deciding WHO can get into the chain is censorship and violating the basic tenant of neutrality.

The phrase isn’t “Bitcoin is for everything,” it’s “Bitcoin is for everyone. nostr:note14hm0a4xz7v5dmsmslj6h694vmnlytc59k4mv2s254clm3zdcpzmsujjv3x

From any Whirpool Tx0 you can get the unmixed changes from users and trace them, it doesn't matter if these changes are in the initial Tx0 or not, the blockchain is there. It is a marketing deception and lack of understanding of how a coinjoin works by its users.

It is also a marketing deception to pay fees to the coordinator to avoid a Sybil attack, it is simply more expensive for the common mortals but not for any spy agency. Moreover, in Whirpool's case, the attacker will only have to pay once for each group of trackers introduced into the system indefinitely.

It also adds that some of its users are de-anonymized because they give up their xpub and even their ip if they do not enable tor.

It is also a marketing deception to pay fees to the coordinator to prevent a Sybil attack, it is simply more expensive for the common mortals but not for any spy agency. Moreover, in Whirpool's case, the attacker will only have to pay once for each group of trackers introduced into the system indefinitely.

Add also that part of their users are de-anonymized because they give up their xpub and even their ip if they don't enable tor.

I am very impressed by the lack of compression of their ninja users, obviously the mixed coins are mixed as in the other coinjoin implementations, neither more nor less, with its advantages and disadvantages. For example in joinmarket if you understand and use correctly the Mixdepths you forget the toxic change as this will end up being mixed and therefore at some point will be lost track, just use coins from the last Mixdepths, and when you pay use the collaborative sending, with which the remaining change of your mixed coins will also be difficult to track as it will be along with the change of the other participants, with these two tips you have all the premix and postmix tools you need but without toxic marketing.

Love to see it.

THIS IS AN EXPERIMENTAL NOTE.

The nature and implications of the experiment will be revealed only to those who participate.

Fiat mining facility Est. 1826