Avatar
Kevin's Bacon
3dda45008a0391d7933e1ae7cc3b844bfd91c92ddefd0f55ce6afd025776f2db
Natural Law Anarchist 🏴 | Bitcoin Noderunner and Miner 🧑 | Aristotelian | Student of Nature | Highly Sensitive Person | High IQ Retard | Austrian Economist | Autodidact | Polymath | Selfish Prick | Excellent Source of Protein and Triglycerides Intellectual honesty is key. Consent is king. Chaos is self-regulating. Authority of any man over another is necessarily a fiction.

A rare occurrence when meat meets greet. πŸ₯©πŸ€™

Lord Skippy Chips & Salsa of the Macy's Discount Section

ahhhh. That was ambiguous. I see now. There is a problem only if the note on your own relay was not accessible to people on that relay. Is that the case? Or is it just that it is receiving less attention but perfectly accessible?

Also is the note a separate note with different meta information on it (like timestamps), or is it an exact copy/rebroadcast?

I missed the part where you explain what the heck you meant.

Asserting opinions over and over again does little good without an explanation or question that the other person can understand. I'm trying to listen and learn what I might be missing. I cannot learn much when I can’t even understand the point.

startup cities in Africa gonna be lit.

Also Prospera, on the Honduran island of Roatan, is a classical liberal startup city with pure laissez-faire. People love to go there for experimental surgery, ziplining, snorkeling, and working and keeping the money they earn. More and more businesses are starting to use bitcoin there.

Hinestly crying in the shower is way healthier. People are fucked up. Corporate phones are garbage. I used real technology as a kid: PlayStation and PCs.

One that takes both human action and protocol compatibility across relays into account.

And you also don't take economics into account. People will fight for their free speech. Low friction ways of doing it are available on nostr. People can choose whatever damn relay they want. They don't have to listen to someone if they don't want to, nor tldo they have to subscribe only to the relays that do silence people. Voluntary choice and the ease with which people have options on nostr already handles things pretty well. Further innovations and the market will handle whatever remains to be done.

There is no issue. This doesn't address any actual failure for censorship resistance. This post likens the relays using the protocol to a single platform, as if there were high friction to getting to the person you want to hear from and rebroadcast.

The reasoning here is seriously flawed.