Avatar
Dan
40bdcc08888d98d49d03fb93bffd1cc46d9b8f187d08c9fc81b4adf0ad00fd2c
Est. 769,296

never selling my s2000... going to be like the guy from iRobot in 40 years with the lone gas/"dumb" car/motocycle

Replying to Avatar walker

Y’all I have a new plan to #grownostr

Screenshot partial nostr:npub1a2cww4kn9wqte4ry70vyfwqyqvpswksna27rtxd8vty6c74era8sdcw83a notes and post them to the platform formerly known as Twitter…

No one is strong enough to resist the allure of Lyn’s intellectual musings…

Ha that's actually a great idea. Cross-post but cut off the twitter posts. Green bubble them basically

Selling selling.sale for sales sales. Sale me if sales. Sales

Truly hate to say it, but recently it's been chatgpt... Have been able to go down some really interesting rabbit holes researching topics using it.

Um, have you taken a look at how many pieces of legislation get passed every year? At the local, State, federal level? If you think our government works anything like this you're absolutely insane and completely brainwashed by the msm

Replying to Avatar jimmysong

What's the End Game?

================

My last post advocating for a Bitcoin chain split drew various reactions. Some labeled me as irresponsible, while others claimed I was undermining proof-of-work (I wasn't) or promoting a hard fork (again, I wasn't). The critics want more technical discussions to reach a consensus.

Here's the core issue: what's the endgame for drivechains? We've debated the technical aspects for seven years. Do we expect new information that will suddenly unite everyone?

The reality is, those in favor of a drivechains soft fork aren't going away. If anything, they will grow louder. So, what's the end result of endless discussions?

Prolonged debate without consensus not only wastes time but stall other valuable updates. I'll remind you that seven years of discussion have not resolved this issue.

A peaceful resolution now has a lot of benefits. We can put much of this debate to bed by engaging the market instead of claims made by marketers. We can see whether the things promised by the advocates actually come to pass and we'll learn a lot more about miner incentives.

Of course, there are other ways to resolve this conflict besides a chain split, such as creating a separate chain, using a different sidechain mechanism, or adding the needed op codes in an altcoin. Yet, these options have been available for seven years and haven't been pursued by the drivechain advocates. I think those are better resolutions than a chain split and a successful use case would be the best way to convince those of us that are skeptical of the drivechainers' claims. But that's not what they're doing and so we are at loggerheads.

In summary, the drivechain debate isn't resolving itself. A split will end this divisive conversation and allow us to focus on more productive projects like improving the Lightning Network or furthering Taproot features.

How beautiful is it that unless an idea is nearly unanimously agreed to be for the public good it causes absolute gridlock for a decision that effects everyone. It's what government should look like. I dig it.

Replying to Avatar Russo

Every president since Coolidge

How is webauthn not exactly what I'm asking about?

Is it possible for a PWA to tap into Android biometrics?

nostr:npub1mutnyacc9uc4t5mmxvpprwsauj5p2qxq95v4a9j0jxl8wnkfvuyque23vg is night and day more reliable at routing payments with this newest release. Well done, dudes 🤙