Avatar
RamenCoffee
410faeff0abf5d7d7c202b4f42e30136a30edd4aeb6b38b1972b6bf742c9f26b

my guy, pls scrernshot, the photo is restricted

I think the point is to deter uses of testnet by shitcoiners.

People were using testnet as a base to issue shitcoins.

The plan B is something else as a demand.

You're in everyone's company

their cbdc launch really went well. I'm sure this will too.

Got me thinking :

Gold ownership is irreversible. But with bitcoin, if a seizure is really unpopular, there is a remedy : forking.

I mean. The government has to identify the corn they are seizing. If it's really unpopular, a fork that reverts those txs may survive and seizure does nothing.

nostr:nevent1qqs92w8jpgeped27y55qg6u9rhw2fwp876rja848kt8y6fu8l5y0zcqpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqzyr830vhhzvx9gr4xrfdg93qplxazwesm9qur4sgas7c2hjvtc3mlvqcyqqqqqqgsdgyur

Silverlining : they will have to screw up their currency bad for a 6102 to be worth the trouble. Corn would have to be at least a milly. At that point, bitcoiners will be able to dictate some of the terms of engagement

bitcoin has a self-correcting mechanism to popularity : the block size.

why did the chicken cross the road..... i was following orders. show me your papers hanz

They have to. The only way bitcoin can win is if it allows a jurisdiction to thrive outside of the US.