Avatar
hahahaha
4291f9b75248f926475a9cd5015bc7187f103205f7d2af6a9815cb15bb8d438f

You got right. The beautiful thing about BTC is that will not be possible to everyone convert their fiat into BTC. At some point, the only way to get some bitcoin will be through labor. A very good example of this scenario can be found in Atlas Shrugged, looking how the commerce in Atlantis works. Everything priced in gold and the only way to get some gold is through labor. Gold became the ultimate unit of account and therefore to valuable to anyone being interested to exchange by any amount of fiat. When BTC succeeds, will be the same case and everyone will realize the real value of bitcoin: 1 BTC = 1 BTC.

Exactly. If everyone chooses BTC was because BTC succeeds as monetary solution and the centralization risk vanishes. A hypothetical example of this reality was given in the book Atlas Shrugged when they choose to only accept gold between them and fiat money became worthless in Atlantis. Everything was measured and priced in gold and the only way to earn some gold to transact with them was through labor. At some point, BTC will not be sold anymore and everyone will realize the real value of BTC: 1 BTC = 1 BTC.

…single unit of account. Not because is a single form of money. People should be free to choose what form of exchange of their labor / time for goods or whatever they want and bitcoin is the only currency that you are able to choose (different from the state money that you are enforced since your birth). The current system forces a person with similar skills and performance to work more to have the same purchase power just because he born in a third world country and the corrupt government take over 50% of his income as taxes.

To give you an example: Check the prices of the cheapest car in any country versus the minimum wage.

Of course, there is a lot of factors involving the difference like profit margin, corruption, government interference, state inefficiency, etc. but the root of all these other factors is the form of money. So, bitcoin (as probably you already know) solve several problems just being a new world unit of account equalizing the fair value of our time wherever you live and a new form of money - if you choose so - separating your money from state.

O problema começa quando a pessoa acredita no que politico fala…

A lógica é a seguinte: Se político e/ou apoia político, então não é confiável.

Existem dois tipos de pessoas em uma sociedade com sistema político: 1- Pagadores de impostos

2 - Consumidores e recebedores de impostos

Encontre qual você é, o oposto é o seu inimigo.

Exactly 💯

The problem starts when parents leave the screen babysitting the child with anything that hooks the attention, without know what the child is watching.

A child with a device properly configured with parent control with a selected content of apps previously reviewed by the parents, is an educational tool. A tablet full ok books, educational apps, encyclopedias is not harmful.

Prevent children to access the technology will only delay their learning curve, not preventing them from be addicted. A lot of adults which born without screens are just morons with their smartphones, being raised without screens is not the answer.

This could be possible in the future when the cost of the hardware required will be similar to a book and the installation/running simple as use an app in a mobile. But a huge step before that will be to have every bitcoiner using cold wallets and not leaving their coins on custodians. After that, the natural next step will be having a node.

It’s seems not fair to compare a piece of technology to regular books. No one is interested to read the full content of the blockchain. The incentive to have a node is only for those who has achieved some degree of knowledge about BTC, the prerequisite for reading or have a copy of a book is less complex than that.

She sounds like the former Brazilian president Dilma Rousseff, the one who had the idea to stock wind to use it in energy wind farms…

Good luck Americans 👍🏻

Pesquisa Bitcoinheiros no YouTube, lá tem diversos tutoriais.

Sell to “profit” and Sell to use are two different things.

Sell Bitcoin to “profit” is a lack of understanding and knowledge, and therefore criticized.

Sell in order to use it to expand the ecosystem is fine. You are only selling because the other part that you want to exchange doesn’t accept Bitcoin, otherwise it will be just be a P2P BTC transaction.