DDoS proposal:
Further,
https://primal.net/e/note1p8xmq3zr7lgryal45j562eqg9q4gyzq0hz37j7ac4sjecpg28qxspxq6m0
un fucking believable. bitcoin maxis only know how to build piles of shit, tell other people what to do, and be a destructive nuisance.
You're just an ignorant idiot who feels like trolling.
No one here is saying custodial wallets are good, just use it for your convenience.
Bye bye
https://darthcoin.substack.com/p/getting-started-lightning-address
>go ahead and put your penis in the paper shredder. it's probably not even turned on and you're only putting in the tip. it'll grow back
You're just an ignorant idiot who feels like trolling.
No one here is saying custodial wallets are good, just use it for your convenience.
Bye bye
https://darthcoin.substack.com/p/getting-started-lightning-address
your article proposes to construct a centralized mixing service. just like the ones that have scammed countless people and delivered suboptimal privacy to unsuspecting victims. you're a scammer.
you didn't say "custodial lightning wallets are bad don't ever use them." this means you are a bad actor. it's 100% black and white. custodial wallets will sodomize your wealth like mark karpeles.
Bitcoin e-Cash mints "micro banks" is a super power.
It's literally one-button "Free Banking" for everyone.
Start a Free Bank here https://www.enuts.cash
go to hell you scammer piece of shit
>I opened a channel with an onchain transaction during a precious moment when the mempool wasn't as stuffed as a turkey on thanksgiving. I am very smart
if everyone who used ethereum and solana and all the other chains suddenly found salvation and joined your stupid religion, there would NOT BE ENOUGH ROOM for a fraction of them to do what you did. even the lightning devs will tell you this and you ignore them completely. if your L2 solution forces people to do onchain transactions to control their own money, it's broken and you need to try something else.
lightning has intractable flaws that make it totally non-viable outside of custodial usage. but that's totally fine. bitcoin maximalists can just stop being colossally stupid and start shifting attention to L2 technology that doesn't rely on payment channels. any day now. the future is bright.
>bitcoin has plenty of privacy to protect the average user and even better privacy for more advanced users
convince DNM admins or shut up. nobody actually believes this
you don't tell somebody with a job to do that they have a short time preference. you don't just go around telling people to close down their activities and wait for bitcoin to someday make monero and ethereum obsolete while you twiddle your dick in your little echochamber. people need these things today right now and bitcoin isn't ready to deliver them. "there is no second best."
I think some of these maxis who deny reality are glowie alphabet people, some of them are corporate saboteurs, and most of them are just really dumb
THE LIGHTNING NETWORK:
SACRIFICE YOUR SOVEREIGNTY
OR YOUR SANITY
you're pushing a broken technology and making the entire concept of digital currency look like a complete joke. this is not what I signed up for in 2012. of course I'm going to sound mad.
ethereum virtual machines have more bitcoins deposited into them than the lying notwork.
LN: 4824 BTC (a huge chunk is custodial wallet services)
noncustodial EVM implementations: 4815 BTC composed of
RSK - 3202 BTC,
tBTC - 1309 BTC,
renBTC - 304 BTC
custodial EVM implementations: 158168 BTC (only WBTC)
EVMs trustlessly hold about as much BTC as the entire lying notwork. also, all custodial LN wallet services combined hold fewer bitcoins than the custodial WBTC contract. this makes the EVM the most popular bitcoin scaling solution today in terms of capacity. TPS numbers are probably higher too.
EVM users enjoy L2 scaling solutions that don't suck ass. tBTC on the ETH L2 Arbitrum can be kept in hardware wallets because rollup technology doesn't sacrifice cold storage.
the holy grail:
* I want to hold BTC noncustodially
* I want to use cold storage and hardware wallets
* I want fees to be cheaper than BTC mainnet
* I want to easily send or receive any amount, large or small
* I don't want to make any onchain transactions myself if I don't have to
laser eye maxis haven't delivered this. with lightning and payment channels in focus, it simply will never happen. methheads and only methheads have been able to deliver it. they would do more for you than you would ever do for them.
statements dreamed up by the utterly deranged
pivot to drivechains or zkrollups or this will be you soon. it's not too late
worthless glowie alphabet saboteur adam back pitches centralized database to a room of bitcoin ecommerce enthusiasts
#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=864x1920&blurhash=%5BKB%7CEJM%7BE1M%7B%7EqRjRPRjD%25oft7t700xu%25Mt700xuxut7M%7Bj%5Bofj%5B_3M%7BM%7BRk_3M%7BM%7BRjxvWBayWC&x=b30d6b22102039e2466a7dbca63a9586911c5429e9930820b7ea078d4697a973you literally posted an advertisement for a custodial wallet. this is why you maxis are all the same. you doublespeak. we both know most people are not going to fund a channel with an onchain transaction or run a node. a good L2 scaling solution wouldn't have the ridiculous limitations that lightning has. this is not the only way.