My comment was tongue in cheek. ;)

Also would you remember your npub in an interview?

You're kidding!? How vulnerable do you have to be to consent to give your credentials to whatever to your employer? If you want to hire a slave, ask for that stuff.

Yeah, the article is three weeks old :( And a disgrace. So many bitcoiners celebrate Bukele while this looks like he's disappearing even the most prominent people.

I gave Colby feedback in private which he pulled into the public. I like to share criticism in private (and praise in public) cause those rambling in public come across as big cry babies but as he pulled it into the public: I explained how my **first impression** was that of yet another shitcoin. The whole layout of the page with a whitepaper looked like a template I have seen literally more than 100 times over the recent years. I'm a developer. I'm dedicating all my time to Bitcoin and related tech but don't have infinite time, so I use heuristics to dismiss certain projects and as I felt the project might not be as bad as the first impression, I let him know my first impression in private - only to get insulted in public.

I get it, marketing is not my strong suite neither, so I still have not muted the two of you but a constructive, friendly conversation does look differently.

You are lashing out over some **private** feedback I gave you for your consideration when I told you that your website looks like shitcoinery with the marketing bla, the "whitepaper" and the made up names.

Not understanding tech is not the same as not having time to read through every shitcoin project's "whitepaper".

Hey princess, if feedback isn't appreciated, don't ask for it!

More

But ... I'm confused. Do these other language models "think" they are ChatGPT 3.5 or did I configure something wrong?

So I would like to reply to nostr:npub1t89vhkp66hz54kga4n635jwqdc977uc2crnuyddx7maznwfrpupqwra5h9 's note but in none of the clients I usually use can I open it. I can find it as a reply to another note via his profile for example but when I open it, it just does not work.

Try for yourself: https://njump.me/nevent1qqsqrqvhrgq4zzr8au2dh89kzuzuhnth02u2pzsx6j39xewyqj5leac7ejuku

Ironically he's lamenting about not getting replies in that note so I thought I'd bring it up.

While njump does render the note, clicking these links to other clients usually gives me empty pages or infinite spinners.

Wait, it is 6 touch zones? I had opened issues with suggests under a different assumption. I thought those touch zones were basically two, where you would get an x value between 0 and 1. Scrolling uses that, doesn't it?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QFgcqB8-AxE

Funny how an image can induce your brain to play back an audio. 😄

Well, zapathons are probably "onboarding" the same people over and over again every day. You get what you pay for.

As for your screenshots ... I would ignore beggars but somehow here people jump at them and shoot them sats for no reason.

I zap but these 1sat zaps are an insult, 21sat are not meaningful to anybody and even a problem for the lightning network. I wish, people would only zap meaningful amounts deliberately towards well chosen individuals.

As you want an ontolgoy of the note itself, maybe the author should not be shown to not influence the choice?

That said, I wish there was a way to interact with the notes discovered this way. Please add a link to social clients. Something like njump but remember my choice. So add a link "join conversation" that opens a modal showing options like njump and a checkbox to remember choice. Next time, open the conversation directly in the preferred client.

Also, if you let me brows my timeline like this, I might be more inclined to label than if there is no way of jumping into the conversations.

Entertainment -> Art

I love the idea of having an ontology for everything but as you already said, AI probably is very efficient at it already so the manual work on posts without context is tedious for probably little gain.

I also have to skip most notes as none of the categories matches.

"If the stars align, nostr is going to get a nice map app 🤩" is technology -> nostr but is that a meaningful ontology? How about "motivational"? How about "community"? I think, many categories overlap and for different people different dimensions are relevant.

I think I would experiment with LLMs and ask an LLM API for the top 5 labels it can come up with for any such post and then ask the user to pick from those or pick another label.

Also please allow the first coarse categorization as labels. If I clicked on Food & Drink cause it's the right category but I don't want to dive deeper, the worst user experience is to have to click back to click skip. How about letting me assign it or skip from the submenu, too?

In the last 3 weeks, GitLab's issue tracker grew by about 400 open issues. That is not sustainable! But with monthly up to 3000 issues being created, it's pretty insane to the amount of issues being closed, too.

TIL: Gitea went through some drama already a year ago. nostr:npub1v0lxxxxutpvrelsksy8cdhgfux9l6a42hsj2qzquu2zk7vc9qnkszrqj49 is developing Snort on Gitea and it's generally a great replacement for GitHub but Gitea hoster Codeberg switched to the Gitea fork Forgejo.

nostr:nevent1qqsxmc5zdynjvrhf5yt7fefujmkp6qg4fq4pu5wyg34q99k0a7vfe5cpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhsygzxljlrqe027xh8sy2xtyjwfzfrxcll8afxh4hh847psjckhkxwf5psgqqqqqqs967gla

So "my network" shows 20 accounts I see all the time cause I follow them. That's "Page 1 of 3646". 3646 pages clearly is more than my follows. How can I find the highest rated that I do not follow yet?

I think clients will improve and key management will also improve. Browser extensions could detect when a replaceable event changes drastically and ask if that's ok for that kind or specifically handle kind3 or keep backups or ... there is a million possibilities but making the list of follows 5 times heavier is probably the worst approach.