It's like how email is decentralized because we have the choice between Gmail and Outlook.
How's your Bitcoin business going.
Any more wet wipes?
> Bitcoin sheep
BLASPHEMY
Its dollar value is probably there to stay for a while. I mean shares in Enron and Wirecard had a dollar value for quite a while didn't they.
I have skills and mostly invest into my own skills, that's a low-risk endeavor. No need to gamble.
Cointard triggered to no end. I'm getting my money's worth today.
nostr:note1tc2a6svulf7aa3zdwjg99n82sr35vps6qc8ed6rr0s0pvaknf3vs4xpxzs
@npub14srklruqae9ynu3v9n393h87dcg9mc9lq2dqfrar4r0yk5wph9ts8vrvyl joined nostr for "free speech", but when it arrived he wasn't prepared
There's literally nothing to spend it on and we both know that.
15 years in it has not done it and it's not for a lack of propaganda.
I could say something about a flexible money supply and price stability but I think I've posted enough many notes about that elsewhere.
Bitcoin is worth nothing unless you sell it.
From 53:10 onwards you can see US government shills promoting US censorship
We learn that:
- Proud that Russia Today has been banned in the US
- Favoring banning of China's CGTN in particular their propaganda outlet "First Voice" in the US. "It's insanity that this is allowed."
- The danger is that Americans "might think about who they vote for".
- Maybe American elites are evil but it's "not their [China's] place to say".
- It involved AI, oh my.
- Comedians aren't allowed to criticize politics.
- etc. etc. etc.
We just call them routers in my neck of the woods.
Readen metal carried trains. What does Bitcoin do.
If a chocolate bar has "45g" of cocoa in it according to the ingredients then how does relate to the above?
The above is raw cocoa somehow and what goes into the chocolate is processed, is it?
How much of the raw goes into 1kg of processed?
Then why are you still here, bothering us.
Privacy and decentralization are core values of the creative class myself included.
Pandering to unskilled peasants is disgusting why don't you take your agenda elsewhere.
No. The message is a different one. Property (latin Immobile, so unmovable) serves as a savings mechanism (Google Cantillon effect) but the dimensions are just insane due to money printing. Imagine people (the majority not just rich people with Ferrari) switch to “mobiles” instead of houses. Your Golf is worth 5 millions dollars. Great. You hardly use it for driving just as a store of value… That is the message! A home will always come with a price tag but with reasonable dimensions in connection to different salary income/home value ratios under a hard money standard (past: gold/future: #bitcoin?). nostr:npub1cj8znuztfqkvq89pl8hceph0svvvqk0qay6nydgk9uyq7fhpfsgsqwrz4u what do you think?
The value of any property is infinite because ownership indefinite. A true fair price would be an infinite amount of money in any currency. Property prices are only limited by how much people can borrow.
The only workable economic system is one where property rights are limited in time. Via land tax according to Henry George or Silvio Gesell or once-off payments for a fixed-time use, essentially a long-term lease.
Singapore has such a system where you "buy" an "HDB flat" for 49 or 79 or 99 years. See "remaining lease" in this example table. This applies to ~80% of all property in Singapore.
It has nothing to do with hard or soft money.