Avatar
frphank
47be0b2a89faaa66bc57f5c679203486da45660295cb3db3c2f38f4be8d8816e
Autopoietic. Scratching things from chaos. Homesteading the noösphere. Opportunity farmer: Reading things that are not yet on the page. Haskell. Dollars only, thanks.

The chain of messages can be forked in double ratchet.

However, any message has a "previous message" like any commit in git has an ancestor. This provides important context, as to understand a message you need to know what previously transpired in a chat.

If your attacker doesn't know whether he has all the messages neither does the legitimate recipient and will as such have trouble comprehending the conversation. Your "it's not a bug it's a feature" doesn't work here.

She hangs out with _those_ kind of people. 😮

Dollars are my preferred move. It says so in my profile. Bitcoin doesn't figure anywhere because if profitable Bitcoin businesses are somewhere between hard and impossible, Bitcoin is impossible.

Replying to Avatar PDJ

All of your crossing the chasm models are destroyed.

Fiat fundamentalists have no idea how difficult it is to make an ethical and profitable Bitcoin only business.

By the time Bitcoin reaches the early majority of the adoption curve these people will not understand why it seemed so difficult to understand or adopt before or what went into making their onboarding experience so easy.

The rate of improvement on Bitcoin only services along with the feature sets are incredible. Some that come to mind are onramp’s latest insurance update, river’s force field, unchained’s lending products etc, and Bitkey’s experience to name a few.

The product roadmap for these services have such a large overlap of competitive features that are just table stakes and the price of admission to be considered as a service. And if these features are not already free they will be. It’s just too difficult to differentiate as financial services products to charge for table stakes.

This makes for a competitive landscape with no room for errors.

We simply have not seen this type of competitive set up for consumer services before.

Add to the undifferentiated feature sets that the best engineers in the World are ones that think from first principles and identify the biggest opportunities before writing any code. Morally and ethically they would rather lose money than to chase easy crypto wins. They’re obsessed with the challenge.

These engineers work in Bitcoin and compete against other engineers of this caliber all day. The result is that these services competing for existing and new Bitcoiners are creating the possible set of experiences that has ever existed for the best money that has ever existed.

All of your crossing the chasm models are destroyed.

> Fiat fundamentalists have no idea how difficult it is to make an ethical and profitable Bitcoin only business.

We have a perfectly good idea. That's why we don't do it.

The older one, yes and as far as I can see from my vantage point also the stack of choice for at least 90% of commerical and community projects.

From the 5 use case presented here https://kotlinlang.org/docs/getting-started.html#console only half of one (cross-platform iOS) needs native.

That makes it "default".

And that also means without LLVM Kotlin would not just technically function just fine, the community/industry would continue to exist just fine.

Kids don't listen to the creepy old man above ^^.

Kotlin exists just fine without LLVM. Per default it compiles to Java bytecode whereas LLVM compiles to machine code.