Avatar
Alex Jones
4a22781cdcbcea1cafad9b599b3201b0bcc0edbc9b41560bb44e2ac2e7f5c34a
NOSTR is the tip of the spear. That is where you will find me. I got all the documents and ya'll never read the God Damned things If you want some sats send me a message and I will likely send some.
Replying to Avatar WienerMemer

Don't find a lot of leftist at bitcoin meetups

Buy the dip with MSTY monthly dividends

Replying to Avatar Eluc

If more and more companies and governement start accumulating #Bitcoin faster and faster, wouldn't we end up with only a fraction of hodler from retail, private individuals (current estimation is still around 50%)?

What it would mean for the future of Bitcoin?

Just a few thought:

The maximum numbers of sats available per individual will be shrinking like hell, unless the big institutional hodler sill dump on us.

Today each individual could fight for 125ksats maximum, most of it is not available on exchange.

Big institution would have more and more influance on the price by deciding how fast they buy and if they decide to sell at some point.

Indirectly these wealthy institutions might try to influance the devs, the big players and manipulate the public opinions for their profit. Probably already happening, I'm not naive.

Will there be a hard limit for public adoption due to the above? A significant percentage of active retail investor might make the step (counting the one using ETFs) but most people still think that investing is not reachable for them, that it's only for the rich and skilled one.

Some countries/regions/groups are adopting Bitcoin because it offers something valuable for them (easier than using bank/cards, less risk than their local hyperinflated fiat currency, no/low risk of confiscation, easy to travel with...). These individuals will be like permanent Bitcoin investor and very active users/actors, probably compensating a part of the above but to which extend?

Feel free to comment my thoughts, add you opinions and share further.

#FutureOfBitcoin

yes this is true.

Only option is to be an extremely toxic maximalist and try to scare off institutions from adopting bitcoin.🤣 😅 😂

When a market maker (MM) sells a MSTR call that is out of the money what happens?

1. they usually hedge the sold call to make it "delta-neutral".

2. so if the call is out of the money the delta on the call might be .2 ....this means the MM will go long 20 shares of the stock for every 100 shares of call options sold.

3. the delta can change if price moves

4. If price of the shares goes up the delta get closer to 1.0 as the share price approaches the strike price of the option

5. so if price rises the MM needs to buy more shares.

6 if price falls the MM needs to sell shares to stay delta neutral

Lots of people excited about the large # of calls that are set to expire on Jan 17....and thinking if price is rising as this data approaches it could spur a huge amount of mstr shares purchases(a gamma squeeze)