Avatar
DataNostrum
4aa4d22440770429fa745b674fab7e46ed267f36a1abae6ff4e8d26eb65b7f52
Stumbling around

I'm leafing through it at the moment, to see what all the fuss is about. It has some interesting descriptions of the abstract power hierarchies that we use to enforce ownership.

https://aul.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma995901882406836&context=L&vid=01AUL_INST:AUL&lang=en

Have you read Lowery's book?

In the Indian system, there is a word for 100K, but not for 10K a million.

1,000 = hazar

10,000 = 10 x hazar

100,000 = lakh

1,000,000 = 10 x lakh

There is a word for every odd power of ten after that.

Did you know that the Japanese have a word for 10,000?

In English:

10 = ten

100 = hundred

1,000 = thousand

10,000 = 10 x thousand

In Japanese:

10 = juu

100 = hyaku

1,000 = sen

10,000 = man (not 10 x sen)

Yes, we're stuck in a limbo between BTC and sats, too many orders of magnitude in between without a name

Yes, or "100 million sats"

nostr:note1g754c7fj95e0hem4qrfzcs9rs56qth0uwystukczv08zvqrla7aqaewt45

Our minds seem to handle only a few orders of magnitude of something, then we need a new name.

For instance, we know what $1,000 is, but instead of 1,000,000 we say 1 million, and 1,000,000,000 is 1 billion.

And we wouldn't say 0.01 million, we would say 10,000 or 10K.

So we don't like fractions smaller than 1, and we can handle 3-4 zeros before switching to a different name.

Unit bias is real. Even though 0.00001 BTC and 1000 sats are exactly the same thing, people will massively prefer the sound of the latter.

#Bitcoin

Stand up straight with your backups tested