hahaha. yah that'll happen. flower burns too hot that way. Terpenes are super volatile and will make nasty tire flavors during the burn if too hot.
it was a left over read from last raids then hyperliquid gave me some so I was like hmmm. and threw a baby bag at it
I copped these at .02
big up lol
for the culture bro.
satoshi-nakafomo is my fave name on list for the record. kinda says it all
Agreed. But i said "Ordinally" hehe
then be blessed? kek
thats cheating and you know it hahahaha
womp womp
So in summary, as this has gone on longer than I intended, utilitarianism is moral bankruptcy because the “greater good” on which it relies is necessarily in the future, and we cannot predict the future with enough accuracy, especially over the medium and longer term, to do a proper moral accounting.
As a result, whoever has power is likely to cook the books in whatever way he sees fit, and this moral philosophy of the greatest good for the greatest number paradoxically tends toward a monstrous outcome — temporary benefits for the short-sighted few and the greatest misery for most.
- Chris Liss
I did my best to answer this. Anyone have thoughts?
You should read Machiavelli. It's instructive. Here is an exerpt that deals with this from the pragmatic prince perspective but makes it clear that it is wrong.
And it must be understood that a ruler, and especially a new ruler, cannot always act in ways that are considered good because, in order to maintain his power, he is often forced to act treacherously, ruthlessly or inhumanely, and disregard the precepts of religion. Hence, he must be prepared to vary his conduct as the winds of fortune and changing circumstances constrain him and, as I said before, not deviate from right conduct if possible, but be capable of entering upon the path of wrongdoing when this becomes necessary. (Machiavelli, 1988: 62)