nostr:nprofile1qqsqqqqqqqr99ezjae52qyv8lvyv3x2fdj6xedgar2sgq0gx8t8dhfcpz9mhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejj7fh7mx0 made a tool called Rana just for this
npubs can be mined! like vanity bitcoin addresses.
nostr:nprofile1qqs22d4tralncqfnh2kmmarjkxk8449hwnk5xtqe3y5yry6hy7ytegqpzemhxue69uhk2er9dchxummnw3ezumrpdejz7qgcwaehxw309ahx7um5wghxvmt59emkj73wvf5h5tcpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhsymkvl9 🤝 nostr:nprofile1qqsglefmxagcu0d7nw4jdkgj9ysqrk9cst0fg44hkz9kzhu39hyt7jspr9mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuumwdae8gtnnda3kjctv9utwyh36 🤝 nostr:nprofile1qqsywlhjgkwfgu2gdua266eugpnnvyaj7nvm5ugwqy7a32xz4dday4gpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduq3kamnwvaz7tmwdaehgu339e682mnwv4k8xct5wvhxxmmdqywhwumn8ghj7mn0wd68yttsw43zuam9d3kx7unyv4ezumn9wsgde36t 🤝 nostr:nprofile1qqs254dy0xkkjdxsl4u08k7cs52u689q67s3pqfwwyfcp4va7avcjdgpz4mhxue69uhk2er9dchxummnw3ezumrpdejqzxrhwden5te0d35kw6r5de5kuemjv4kxz7fwvdhk6qg0waehxw309ahx7tnnw3ezucmjuuqkn2
100% FOSS projekte die beitragen zum zuverlässigeren Lightningbezahlerlebnis
I think we mainly agree. Nostr CEOs are lower value targets compared to platform CEOs. But govs could still come after them for ✨️ reasons.
It's silly to expect a protocol to fix arbitrary arrests.
For those of you who are still on Twitter, I had a long debate thread today with Parker Lewis about Nostr. I'm a big fan of Parker, so I figured I'd share it here for shared learning.
Here's the latest post. I'm not sure it'll be the last or not but it's the latest one as of this writing. You can scroll up to see the exchange from the start.
https://x.com/LynAldenContact/status/1828553130717442443
Linking to my own post in isolation is bad form and the thumbnail is awkward depending on what client you're using, so I'll also provide a pic of the start of the debate too, with two posts of his and one of mine.
I'd be open to any thoughts about this debate.

He's correct, nostr doesn't fix CEOs getting arrested. But his point is also moot because targeting CEOs of nostr apps, even of big ones, will never have the disruptive return for governments that the arrest of a centralized platform's CEO has, mostly because switching costs are close to zero for nostr users, while there is no switching option for telegram users.
The information we have about both historic cases is second-hand. On top of that, history is written by the victors and there is a good amount of nuance lost over time, as your example of Father Coughlin demonstrates: barely anyone knows today that there was factions in the US supporting Germany, and that's mostly because it didn't fit the narrative that the US wanted to establish in the history books.
Secondly, we cannot epistemologically know if deplatforming Coughlin or the Hutu radio saved lives. It's even possible that shutting down the Hutu radio could have inadvertently silenced moderate Hutu voices that might have offered alternative perspectives or advocated for peace that could have changed the dynamics of the genocide.
My point is it is impossible to attribute positive consequences to the restriction of speech, but the negative consequences of restriction of speech are always self-evident.
> que piensas estamos haciendo acá?
Most people are excited about nostr because it makes it hard to deplatform dissenting voices by virtue of its architecture and I am no different. Hearing you sympathize with deplatforming in the context of a presentation about Nostr put me off, that's why I had to ask directly.
Mind you, I'm not questioning property rights. We're in agreement that you should have every right to kick me out of your living room or your relay for any or no reason, only listen to and associate with the people that you like.
My question to you was about deplatforming as in restricting a person’s ability to communicate publicy - specifically in the context of Nostr.
Glad to hear that you do want Nostr to be a protocol that enables even speech you don't like. Thanks for clarifying.
I am with you on your position that violence and genocide is bad and I wouldn't give them a platform either, but historical cases aside, do you believe we should have protocols that allow for censorship-resistant and deplatforming-resistant public communications?
I had hoped / expected there'd be some minimal consensus about what we're here for, like "systems that allow for deplatforming = bad - let's build systems that make censorship hard"
🤖 Tracking strings detected and removed!
đź”— Clean URL(s):
https://youtube.com/clip/UgkxIgWQcI4u3mIMMXBspuOSoyxjt83vxHF8
❌ Removed parts:
?si=ABlpO0KIxWRyLb0g
Thank you good service bot.
If we're not saying "it was a bad thing to deplatform him" — what are we even doing here? nostr:nprofile1qqs8d3c64cayj8canmky0jap0c3fekjpzwsthdhx4cthd4my8c5u47spzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumt0wd68ytnsw43z7qg5waehxw309aex2mrp0yhxgctdw4eju6t0qy3hwumn8ghj7urjdau8jtt90pcx2unfd4jkuapwdah8yetwv3jhytnrdaks0duay6
https://youtube.com/clip/UgkxIgWQcI4u3mIMMXBspuOSoyxjt83vxHF8?si=ABlpO0KIxWRyLb0g
When we lose our principles,
We invite chaos.
I'm sad he's not here any more and I have no way of contacting him. He's a real one and his concerns should be taken seriously, but I can see how the points he raises are very unpopular.
Fig season is the best season 
Nvm, found it. Small UX bug there.
Hitting the "settings" button should always lead to main settings page imho, but when you go into mint config, then switch to wallet, switch back to settings, it brings me to mint config instead of settings main page.
I must've skipped all of that in the onboarding and now I can't find it any more. nostr:nprofile1qqstxwlea9ah3u6kjjszu6a7lrnhqkfh8eptp2z6v0e9558tlkkl2rgpzemhxue69uhk2er9dchxummnw3ezumrpdejz7qgwwaehxw309ahx7uewd3hkctcpremhxue69uhkummnw3ez6ur4vgh8wetvd3hhyer9wghxuet59u4kl3vp heeelp
Is there a way to backup?
They've been saying "open source soon" for two years now. My privacy sensitive friends won't touch it until they can verify, and I can see why. Open source is prerequisite for Don't trust, verify.

Someone zap me please, testing minibits ln address
That's really really cool because other devs can build on that stack, but if the keet app is not open source, it could as well be spyware because we can't verify if it does what it says it does.
Neither desktop nor mobile apps are open source. We have no idea what is happening. It's just trust us.
You can drop the "really". Commons Clause is not open source.
Everything everywhere all at once
Dune 1+2
2.5 years ago I shared a LNURL with sats on nostr and it took 10h 49 mins for it to be redeemed by anon
it's been almost 24h and these sats are still not claimed... 🤔
nostr:note1a250g59rzgq9080svr8fadzap77ac9kz3fnfunevfarsgd65elwses7kcc




