Have you given any thought on handing that task over to AI? Sounds like a pretty solid AI job to me... easier said than done ofc.

Sick people are "hidden" irl extremely quickly, at least in sane societies.

Just in the process of switching over to Linux, writing this on Pop!_os.

Can't accept the forced digital ID, especially not with the all-seeing "copi-lot" copying my data to who knows where. No thanks.

Where does the name GTFO Handbook come from?

Every business needs a tagline, and for my business Sovereign Landing, the tagline is "Go Lightfooted". When my friend Rasbelin heard it, he quipped that a better tagline for a business like this would be just "GTFO".

That thought stayed with me, and I put that idea into practice with the name of this book.

If you live in your country of origin, chances are that you are heavily exploited by people who seem to think they somehow own you, and that the fruits of your labor belong primarily to them.

You do the work, and they enjoy the benefits - in the name of fairness!

If you make the mistake of pointing out that it's all getting rather unfair, they're quick to tell you to learn your place, to STFU and to GTFO.

The GTFO Handbook is about giving them exactly what they want (or to be more precise: what they ask for).

There really is no need to fight any of them!

One of the best things about location independence is the ease of dealing with this leftard NPC crowd, especially their retarded comeback to any criticism of their ever-crazier policies of exploitation and violent coercion:

When you live in a country where people like this are in power, you feel you have to spend endless amounts of energy in trying to convince them to "come back to their senses".

I see so many people trying to desperately figure out ways to somehow convince the violent expropriators that their socialist dreams are killing the country, and if they continue exploiting the productive people, the country will go to hell.

They cannot be convinced, because they actually WANT all of the destruction that is now happening. Their idea of building a better world requires first destroying the old, and they are getting exactly that.

You don't have to stay stuck in those endless, desperate political fights (that you will never win!).

When they tell you to GTFO, you can just give them a simple reply:

At first, you'd think that the violent expropriators might react like this:

In my experience, the truth is much worse: they're simply happy with the thought of you leaving!

That "processing" part never seems to happen, and their "if you don't like it" noise is just an automated knee-jerk reaction to their world view being challenged: there's no actual thought behind it.

They aren't really bothered by productive people moving away, because the combination of the fiat money printer and the democratic "welfare" state DOES provide them with the real option of living endlessly on debt (until it doesn't, but the NPC is unable to think that far).

From their point of view, you moving abroad just works: these annoying ideas challenging their socialist paradise just go away.

Their problem is solved, so why be angry?

For those with even half of a functioning brain, the conclusion from this is obvious: this can't end well…

I discuss what all of this means in my book, especially part 5 (how and why to ignore politics):

https://www.sovereignlanding.com/GTFO-Handbook/

What should be switched off are EU bureaucrats.

Technically this can be switched off with a VPN to somewhere outside the EU, for now at least.

This is definitely a shot across the bow. They're clearly planning the digital ID stuff...

Tested now, seems to be an EU thing as VPN "solves" this... pretty bad either way. Hopefully the owners of these Discord channels start moving to other solutions.

In a previous post, I wrote about how the left is no longer the left - but why should anyone care what they think, or label themselves as?

It's important to make the distinction between the "old" and the "new" left because at their time, the old left was rational, and the majority of the current people actually agree with the views of the old left - even if they are a bit misguided.

If you told most people that everyone has to be responsible only for themselves and the "society" should not intervene if they get in trouble, they would not agree with you - at all!

Where the old left, and the average person of today are misguided, was confusing the society with the state. That's not important for the point here though.

The point here is two-fold:

1. The new crazy left is using the facade of the old rational left to manipulate people and to derail any sensible debates.

2. Trying to argue purely libertarian viewpoints lands to deaf ears for most people, but these points remain equally valid to those "deaf" people - a different approach is required.

With any intellectual integrity, it has to be recognized that all of the even potentially valid points of the old left died with the Soviet Union. Even in, let's say early 1970s, these discussion would have been quite different, and purely theoretical - with liberty-minded people in the minority against an army of intellectuals.

Now, 50 years later, we know for a fact that the general leftist direction for societies is simply doomed. Previously that was clear only to some through theory. Now it's clear both in theory and practice, with indisputable historical evidence.

The problem is that when the USSR died, the ideology of the left didn't die with it - they were forced to re-invent themselves.

Now we're in a situation where the new left has hijacked the rational image and some talking points of the old left.

Even though all of it has now been proven to be invalid, it is still very useful for them in sowing discord. It's an intellectual weapon to divide people according to old battle lines that in reality have ceased to exist long ago.

That doesn't stop them from trying, often successfully, in exploiting the tribal nature of people and in doing so, painting themselves as the vanguards of all that is good and holy - even though all they are now able to advocate for is violent control of their fellow human beings.

We need to see through this charade and call the new left as what they are - pure advocates of state coercion through violence!

They have absolutely no policy goals that can be reached without the threat of violent intervention in the affairs of free people acting voluntarily between themselves.

There's nothing good or holy in that!

That remains true even if all of their stated end goals might first sound like something everyone would want. But if violence and coercion is the requirement to get there, then we should get there in some other way.

We need to recognize and call out this requirement of violence behind everything that they demand!

Just pointing this out at the beginning of every debate completely disarms their primary attack: painting everyone who is against their policies, as cold, selfish sociopaths who would only critize anything the left wants because "they are bad, and the left is good".

When you point out that in this false dichotomy, the "good ones" are actually demanding violence, their mask drops.

I've yet to encounter a leftie that can really argue against this in any way, or even wants to do so.

Many of them actually PREFER violence as the answer - they've just been really good at hiding this fact!

When you point this out, you will not REFORM the leftie - you REVEAL them.

None of this will change the mind of the extremist, but it will do something much more important - it reveals the new left as what they are to EVERYONE ELSE.

Then, after the hijacking of "all that is good and holy" by the violent coercionists can be ended, a new question can be asked among reasonable people:

How do we provide all of those good things to people, without resorting to violence?

That's a much better conversation to have!

nostr:nprofile1qytzqamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwv3sk6atn9e5k7tcpr3mhxue69uhkummnw3ez6vfwde3x7tnpdenkzmnf9e3k7tcqypr90hlgjed73xq2jvrjhna4ukdx2yjyqmdslqvjzhh83wj8jd9numxx6g9 Are you aware of this?

I've never been a fan of Discord and only used it when there was no real choice (some tech support chats and Midjourney), but this is now getting out of hand... is this because of EU bureaucrats or something else?

I can't access any group chats (Alby groups are a real loss!) without doing KYC, which will definitely not be happening... anyone else getting this?

I'm so glad Nostr exists!

The left is no longer the left

The world of the past was divided into two different political sides: the left and right wings.

Left-wing people generally didn’t own much and had to work for a living. Right-wing people had perhaps more resources and usually didn’t need to resort to entry-level jobs or manual labor.

That was the main political divide of the industrial age, and while we still try to apply these same labels to current political thought, they don’t really make that much sense anymore. The “right-wing” people are increasingly more dependent on the entry-level jobs, if they can even find one.

The culture and thinking of the “non-left” people perhaps hasn’t changed that much: their circumstances have shifted greatly, but the underlying ethos is still based around three basic things:

1. Common sense

2. Personal responsibility

3. Improving your lot in life by working hard

Those same ideas weren’t foreign to the left either. If you went back to the heyday of the industrial age, let’s say the 1950s, and talked to any random “leftie”, they would probably agree with you on all of those points.

They would probably even be offended if you just hinted that they didn’t see those as being the foundation of a good life and a healthy society.

That definitely can’t be said of the “left” of today. They will get absolutely triggered if you start talking to them about hard work or personal responsibility.

That shared foundation has been replaced by other values, such as:

- The absolute, non-negotiable top priority is women's rights, although genders don't exist

- More important than women's rights are gay rights

- ...therefore Islam is best, and muslim rights are the top priority

- All cultures are the same, except their own, which is the worst

- Single race - human race! Just say no to the white ones... and the other ones too if they "act white"

- The more unlike the non-existent white culture the other cultures are, the better

- All immigrants are the same, and it's racism to criticize their living permanently on unemployment benefits because they work so hard

- In the class struggle of the working class, saying that people should work for a living is hate speech

- Violence is justified only when it is used to right a wrong: you not having what you think you should have

- Words are violence and theft is "social justice"

- Violence is bad and disagreements should be resolved by debate, except when the other party doesn't agree with you

- Because words are violence, responding to words with violence is justified

I know what some will say – “those are just your purposely twisted version of the real, actually noble goals and values and nobody actually thinks like that!”

But then nobody actually should think like that, and we see the opposite every day.

Not just in the way they think and speak, but in the way they act. I won’t go into details here because if this isn’t obvious to you at this point, I don’t think I can change that.

The “industrial age left” used to be honorable, hard-working people, just with an emphasis on having societal safety nets instead of purely individual responsibility. They were still perfectly rational – what you could call the “common sense left”.

The current “left” has very little in common with the thinking of those people – in fact, if an old and new leftie met, the new leftie would probably dismiss the old one as a “far-right extremist” in under a minute.

Therefore I don’t even like to call these people “the left”.

The division between the left and the right no longer makes any sense.

They are just empty labels on both sides.

There is the “new left”, with their severe challenges with logic, and therefore with reality in general (I have theories on why this is, but that’s a topic for another time).

Then there are everyone else, who just want to get on with their lives without getting bogged down by all kinds of craziness (whatever the “left” has cooked up that day).

These regular people are constantly being labeled as “far-right” whenever they make the mistake of publicly having common sense.

It’s all getting so very tiring. A bunch of crazies have hijacked the brand of the old left, and are using the old (now irrelevant) political divisions as a weapon against normal everyday people.

Don’t let them get away with that – just hold on to your common sense and don’t be scared by the lies they cook up to make you conform to their demands.

If you can’t ignore them, ridicule them! That won’t make them change their mind, but it does something far more important – it allows you to get on with your life!

I would take a pragmatic view and conclude that the society (any society) has protection mechanisms against people with such ideas, and therefore such ideas get snipped in the bud and never propagate.

And I'm actually fine with that.

Words can lead to actions, and certain actions are not acceptable. I'm not ok with violence, or people openly calling for it. You're just proving why that point is valid, even if you're not a leftist.

Continuing my thoughts: I don't think you can apply the label "authoritarian" to people calling for crime control - that's the #1 function of the state!

You can perhaps try to make the case that now the government is going after people who are not criminals, but incitement to crime is also a crime.

And yes, I'm sure many will weasel that cheering for murder is just "an opinion" and not incitement, but I think it's time we just stop buying that BS.

It's high time for the madness to end.

I'm not sure if this is about the state, or "authoritarianism".

I see this as genuine blowback from grass roots every day people who've had enough of the madness, and don't want to see people getting murdered, or to see people cheering for others getting murdered.

I'm sure there are also "authoritarians" out there equally worried about this, but that isn't the gist of this.

This is bit of a read, but very much worth the time: https://primal.net/allen/1758031375463

I'd be genuinely interested to hear your thoughts on it?

Bitcoin is money, and if people try to repurpose the bitcoin blockchain for any other use, it's usability as money suffers.

Fixing money is the most important thing. The blockchain isn't a general purpose database.

Thanks for writing this. I'd like to undo the brainwashing as much as I can, but realistically I think that's mostly a non-starter.

Trying to "help" these people is just received as me attacking them, and getting around that seems near impossible... so I just try to focus my efforts on the ones that are clearly able to have thoughts of their own.

Having said that, I think what might help is to bring in sufficiently outside perspectives that the "system" hasn't yet created this inverse image for those thoughts. It will still create cognitive dissonance, but maybe not that threat reaction.

I've been very hesitant to pick sides in this fight, and definitely don't want to add to the drama. That said, I do think about this a lot...

https://primal.net/e/nevent1qqspwhtczwk4qfvcdrdcvy44ssce2gyla5m2c70vmg7hqqmg5msahug3vqnh8

I'd say this is a variant of the good old "you can't make a man understand something when his paycheck depends on him not understanding it."

People thought these shitcoins were their ticket to riches, so they ignored opposing viewpoints without doing the thinking, and that's always costly.

Maybe they will learn, maybe not. Nature will heal either way.

Then again, he does say "it feels deserved", so he's clearly assuming personal responsibility for this poor financial decision. People just have to learn the hard way, and he's doing it, so I don't see this as sad.

Absolutely correct, and the logic behind this is also clear:

When the state takes your money with the excuse of using it to take care of others, people take that promise to mean something, even when it means next to nothing.

Then, as their money has been taken, they have neither the will nor the resources to help others. They already paid for the service, even if it's never delivered...

My thoughts exactly. I currently have no idea how to access Nostr without these clients, definitely an attack vector.

These "the end of capitalism" clickbaits are so tiring - 100% of the time they refer to something that is not capitalism.

I wish we could have "the end of the end of capitalism", but the bait works, so probably not.

Nice idea!

Would of course be illegal in Finland at least, thou shalt not infringe on state monopolies...

He's just a paid shill for the unofficial British communist party, and it's not possible to get a man to understand something when his paycheck depends on him not understanding it.

Best thing to do is to starve him of attention, because that's what he's after.