ahhh OP (age 20) has a serious case of wordvomititis with a side of arrogance
his fucking calves
also photoshopped
🤦🏻♂️
no, not fact
fact: eating too much is making folks fat
folks eat too much b/c addicted to sugar, convenience.
everything is fake and gay
yaaayyyyyy statism won
you're a moron mr palmer
um no
truth is in the follows
2k : 300
pathetic big clit energy
blocked
nope didn't gorget. low signal moron
that's not resilience 🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️
The outgoing Biden regime probably seeks to do a few things. For one, escalating the war when the entire world knows peace is imminent makes the new administration’s job more difficult. The unelected white house staffers, likely seeking to cause as much damage as possible before leaving office, would approve of such escalations just as a way to stick it to those who are taking their jobs.
Though this level of pettiness seems to be a bit extreme even for the classic D.C. bureaucrat, for many of the personalities currently involved in the Ukrainian war, they may indeed do everything they can to take a scorched-earth stance, and try to stoke World War III just out of spite.
Another likely goal of the Biden regime is simply fraud. While the entire western world panics at the technical line for a nuclear war being crossed (at least according to Russia), one small detail may calm concerns…Ukraine might not actually have the munitions to conduct any long range attack with. Suddenly allowing Ukraine to use long-range munitions against Russia, when they don’t have any more long-range missiles, is a classing political move emblematic of the entire Pentagon intelligentsia. Ukraine gets to shuffle some more money around and pretend to have the capabilities to severely impact Russia, while Russia herself knows that Ukraine can’t do much even with these allegedly new permissions.
While many may put a lot of weight on Ukraine previously being told “no” when it comes to the use of long-range munitions to strike Russia, the sharp reality of this increasingly-desperate war is that Ukraine has shown anything but restraint. Any munition that the United States gives them, gets used immediately (for the most part), as would be expected of any nation in a similar situation. As such, assuming that Ukraine has some large stockpile of ATACMS missiles that they haven’t used yet might not be entirely accurate. Additionally, even considering the “long-range” nature of the specific missiles in question, “long-range” does not mean “unlimited range”. Geography matters, and it’s doubtful as to if the “long-range” missiles given to Ukraine could actually strike Moscow, for instance. Ukraine has already fielded many munitions (such as drones) that have already been used to target Moscow directly, albeit with a very small payload.
On the other hand, only a handful of missiles can cause a rapid escalation into a more kinetic war; one missile evading countermeasures and successfully striking a substantial target in Russia could draw a response that the world is not yet prepared for.
Russia is probably banking on what the whole world knows is happening…the west trying to funnel as much money as possible through Ukraine before an inauguration, and adopting a scorched earth policy to increase the hardships for the next wave of political leadership in the United States. Putin, though technically allowing himself to use nuclear weapons, probably won’t do so in this instance. He knows the war is largely over, and that an armistice (and the buffer zone he wanted) is only a couple of months away.
Despite their rhetoric, Russia is not likely to launch nuclear weapons based on Ukraine striking a few targets inside Russia with a handful of ATACMS missiles.
None of this is particularly comforting for the American taxpayer, however. If the cultural norm is changing to allow for an outgoing regime to try to start WWIII so that the incoming regime has to deal with it…this is a very dangerous game that highlights that the apolitical decorum within Washington (however minimal) that has maintained some level of stability over the years is largely gone.
?itok=NS7ajPB2sorry to pop your cherry but there is no DOC
no.
the whole "dildo of consequences" construct doesn't make sense
braindead horny 18yos made it popular and that lot of jackasses has grown up.
it's like saying "the chicken of consequences rarely arrives plucked"
sure, i could ram the chicken up your asshole, feathers and all. but that's not whst chickens are for.
same goes for dildos.
People are currently infatuated with Micro Strategy / MSTR "because it is a 1.5 leverage play on bitcoin", and are in (deserved) admiration of nostr:npub15dqlghlewk84wz3pkqqvzl2w2w36f97g89ljds8x6c094nlu02vqjllm5m for beating the S&P 500 so convincingly.
I know people close to me who have worked hard and saved bitcoin, but are now being tempted to exchange BTC for MSTR, spurred on by influencers like American nostr:npub1rtlqca8r6auyaw5n5h3l5422dm4sry5dzfee4696fqe8s6qgudks7djtfs (I'm a fan) and his latest strong endorsement.
But, MSTR is nothing like BTC. You sell 1 BTC and buy the equivalent value MSTR. You now own a security that is holding ~0.35 BTC on your behalf. The 'BTC yield' isn't yield on your 1 BTC. It is growing the 0.35 BTC up a little higher each year, but nowhere near the original 1 BTC you had.
Yes, I understand Micro Strategy is offering a service that is of value "like an oil company" (see latest Micro Strategy Earnings Call) and therefore trades at a premium. But this is pure speculation just like buying any other company share. The calculation is whether MSTR will generate more value with his company on the 0.65 BTC (the non-BTC treasury part of your 1 BTC investment) than holding the 0.65 BTC would. And in Saylor's own words about other companies, that means MSTR needs to compound more than 29% a year going forwards in terms of company value. That's quite a hurdle - one that very few companies in history have achieved over the long term.
There are good arguments on both sides regarding MSTR, the value the company provides and therefore its premium.
BUT BEFORE SELLING THE SCARCEST FINANCIAL ASSET on earth, one with no counterparty or company director risk, for a speculative asset, one should just THINK VERY HARD.
You may never be able to get the BTC you sold back again.
(disclaimer: I hold both BTC and MSTR - but MSTR only where I can't hold BTC)
it's all a ponzi scheme. stay humble and stack sats. let these fuckers die
nope.
from the study:
"...The increase in excess cardiopulmonary arrest deaths may also be attributed to COVID-19 infection and disruptions in emergency care during the pandemic."
i.e. the far more likely explanation.
for the record I personally know ~500 vaccinated and boosted people, none of whom have had serious ill effects.
wow so useful.
your OPINION is fucking GIBBERISH
there is that clear enough?
do less weed
