π 
π
nostr:note1swdm4xfyfwhfw93eg9lwy2vk04k9gyagx9ghucx8f8g5dd66g25s80pwch
π 
Maybe this?
nostr:note19ud5kakte8tm8p50ndxzvmtp5lsg9867wewqlv3ddzt8stnlj9ssqsy3md
nostr:npub1leqraca9xtyuezf4vmxa6czrepe04ynpmvjqzf7kq0v3cqnrj8vsmf0ed0
I donβt know. Maybe through some chain analysis?
I speculate (without objective facts), they are coming from asian time zone.
The effects are best observable when the rest of the would are kind of βinactiveβ and in Asia time zone is in regular working time.
An archival full node (regular Bitcoin node) ππ»π
nostr:npub1leqraca9xtyuezf4vmxa6czrepe04ynpmvjqzf7kq0v3cqnrj8vsmf0ed0
That looks mega cool πππ»
nostr:note1nn86xhyjrrhz2pesd0h2gte29tuvxwhgkcjmjakhmhuntfk5pu4qnx09gt
nostr:npub1leqraca9xtyuezf4vmxa6czrepe04ynpmvjqzf7kq0v3cqnrj8vsmf0ed0
That looks mega cool πππ»
Running #bitcoin π on an Android.
Currently pruned to 50 GB. I get myself a 1TB microSD and go full, why node. A personal fullnode for the road, how much more independent can one be?
https://nostr.build/av/ab22a4d592e491786c84e79694e1082d6c0405c204d8b9e0cb0f18cef5777948.mp4
Cool π
A Full Node ππ»
Not an archival full node, right?
Look how the inscription transaction creation machine works:

π 
π 
π 
π 
π 
The narrative of βeconomicβ nodes is following:
A) The timechain & thus the network held by those, use its Sats as money & accept those as such. (Use tendency by companies).
B)The timechain & thus the network held by saving/hodler plebs, use its Sats as money & accept/give those as such. (Use tendency by natural persons).
Two chains/networks in conflict for what is βtheβ Bitcoin.
The βeconomicalβ node is a narrative and a PsyOp.
There is not such an βeconomicalβ node.
There are just nodes (regular ones and mining ones).
The economical majority is a concept to provide the Sats an usage as a money and Bitcoin as a monetary system. And that is at best if companies and plebs use the same network as such.
π 

