Isn’t it funny how both the “right and the left” are always fighting each other on behalf of their leaders? The same leaders who are the real architects of the mess the world is in today. The same group of people purposely leading the world to hell in a hand basket. Statism is a dangerous terminal disease.
“Then came the disciples to Jesus apart, and said, Why could not we cast him out? And Jesus said unto them, Because of your unbelief: for verily I say unto you, If ye have faith as a grain of mustard seed, ye shall say unto this mountain, Remove hence to yonder place; and it shall remove; and nothing shall be impossible unto you.”
Matthew 17:19-20 #amen #biblestr
“Then said Jesus unto his disciples, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me. For whosoever will save his life shall lose it: and whosoever will lose his life for my sake shall find it. For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul?”
Matthew 16:24-26 #biblestr
“And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.”
Matthew 16:19 #gm
“All thy works shall praise thee, O LORD; And thy saints shall bless thee. They shall speak of the glory of thy kingdom, And talk of thy power; To make known to the sons of men his mighty acts, And the glorious majesty of his kingdom. Thy kingdom is an everlasting kingdom, And thy dominion endureth throughout all generations.”
Psalm 145:10-13
Good morning 😇☀️☕️ #gm #biblestr
Antibody production, robust or not, is no guarantee of actual, real-world immunity. Not at all. The assertion that if a vaccine invokes a strong antibody response, it will therefore protect you from catching, spreading, or getting sick from an illness is a faulty inference based on false premises. There are two key reasons why equating antibody production to immunity from disease is a lie:
1. Immune system function involves much more than antibody response.
2. The antibody measured in clinical trials may be irrelevant and/or obsolete to the disease in question.
https://brownstone.org/.../the-first-big-lie-of-vaccinology/
Interesting perspective and i think there is some truth to it, because it's true even in companies that the bigger a company gets, even with the right systems in place, the more bureaucratic the decision making ultimately becomes. Where employees usually had direct access to executive mgt, now they have to go through layers of bureaucracy. That said, i also think at the end of the day people get complacent over time and stop holding their leaders accountable esp during the good times. That's when bad laws and regulations start getting passed, which ultimately become the proverbial boot on everyone's face.
“If you see a proposal for an electronic money system check to see whether it has the ability to preserve the privacy of transactions the way paper money does today. If not, realize the proposal is designed to harm, not help, individual privacy" Hal Finney, Extropy Magazine (1993)
Why am I not surprised? Next up for “toughening” are speech laws. Stay tuned.
The state can obtain your financial records, your location history, your communications metadata, your browsing history, and virtually any other digital information without a warrant or probable cause, merely by issuing a National Security Letter or other administrative demand to the companies that hold this data (3rd party doctrine in the US). These demands often come with gag orders preventing the recipients from even disclosing that they've been served. You can be under total surveillance and never know it, with no judicial oversight, no opportunity to contest the intrusion, no recourse after the fact. This infrastructure never gets repealed, even if "your guy and your party" are in power. It just expands.
Which boggles the mind that, how did such "black plague level popular" leaders get elected in the first place? None of them are impressive or charismatic in any way, but here we are with 3 court jesters running 3 of the most powerful nations in Europe.
The legal system's treatment of privacy is perhaps its most honest expression of state philosophy, which is there is one law for rulers and another for the ruled, one set of freedoms for those in power and another for those who are subject to power. Privacy for me, transparency for thee. Secrecy when I need it, surveillance when I demand it. The laws protecting state secrecy and criminalizing individual privacy are not contradictions, but they are the coherent expression of a system designed to maximize state power while minimizing the capacity for individual resistance.
Keys is definitely way up the totem pole along with Mao and Stalin! He makes Barnays look like an amateur for sure but they were definitely all extremely wicked men who in some circles are still celebrated as geniuses, ironically.
"All of these things are increasingly being created and programmed and decided by algorithms. And those algorithms are fuelled by precisely the innocent data that our devices are creating all of the time constantly, invisibly, quietly right now...And these activity records are being created and shared and collected... constantly by companies and governments. And ultimately, it means as they sell these... what they are selling is not information. What they are selling is us."
Circa 2019
https://video.nostr.build/f4f11b46864f80bf72536c3d38503b9cbe9384c98bd20ea7a172817911386bd7.mp4