It seems be getting harder to understand nostr and how it works. My account seems different at different places. I haven't yet pinned my problems yet but here is my address: https://getalby.com/p/dowstudios I'm still learning this bitcoin stuff 
.
I bought one of the first affordable Atari. Learned programming on it. I was already working for Rich's (now Macys-same parent company). Rich's bought Lazerus. They inherited a computer graphics station with no one knowing how to operate it. I was in a nice temperature controlled cool room. My boss was in charge of it. I walked in with confidence and asked him if I could flick to power switch on. Unix splashed across the screen. GULP! I read up on Unix. I learned to type, "RUN". Whole cluster fucknof machines lit up and made a shitload of noises. I sat down to drew with a digital pen. Later, president of Rich's(Macy's) advertising/marketing was impressed and told my boss not to give me any workloads and let me play with this Unix paradise. I told what I had and some said theres only two 18 inch LaserWriter of that type in Atlanta. I had one of them. Later, big guys signed off purchasing Macintoshes for 80 advertising workers. Every year, I got the newest one and others got my later ones. Trump and my boss were buddies. Boss was seen in Apprentice Show. Trump misbehaved and boss told him to take Trump products to leave Macy's. I did retouching on some of his products. 2008 Wallstreet crash! Macy's closed Southeast divisions. I got Nicky laid off. Refused New York opportunities. Now I here on Nostr (may know better on Usenets) with 44 cents. I still do #ART ! I invented #paintwithdow with the latest on #nostr. I hope to grow on Nostr but I need Zaps to mint my art and teach how I did my art on #decentralized socials. I already lost much on discontinued centralized networks. Lord help me! Now I'm off to finish my new art movement (modern #fauve to compete with AI art) only to be shared on Nostr is possible.
Is it possible? (we had a "YES!" movement in Macys marketing. It worked really well)
#God
#Deus
#Jesus
#Catholic
#Católicos
#Faith
#Fé
#Biblestr
#Nostr
#Grownostr
For those of you advocating for the return of the guillotine:
On July 17, 1794, in the final days of Maximilien Robespierre’s fiendish leadership over revolutionary France, fourteen Carmelite nuns and two female servants were guillotined at the Place du Trône Renversé (now called the Place de la Nation), in Paris. Their official condemnation listed assorted crimes against the state, and their remains were placed in a common grave along with the over 1,300 other victims of the guillotine.
The final song the sisters sang was Psalm 117, "Laudate Dominum". Sister Constance, a novice, the youngest of the group and the first to die, "spontaneously" began the chant, but it was cut short by the guillotine blade. Each sister joined her and were silenced in the same way.
A Lasting Witness
Sixteen victims of the thousands murdered by the French Revolution, the Carmelite Martyrs of Compiègne were from the time of their executions remembered with an intense fervor and revered for their holiness and courage. Indeed, credit for the shocking close to the Terror was given to the Carmelites of Compiègne by those in the Conciergerie who had come to know them well. As religious orders were still forbidden in England, English Benedictine nuns founded a home at Cambrai, France. Like the Carmelites, they had been imprisoned in Paris in October 1793 and had met the nuns from Compiègne in the Conciergerie’s dungeon. They loved and venerated the martyred Carmelites and preserved with devotion the secular clothes the women left behind. When the Reign of Terror halted so abruptly, the English Benedictines gave thanks for the holiness and the act of offering made by their beloved sisters.
https://www.catholic.com/magazine/print-edition/they-sang-all-the-way-to-the-guillotine
Watching "Tudors" on Netflix was educational. Its a king Henry series. You learn kings are blended in with the papal systems. It has a lot of who did what and its sad. Kings and catholism worked together back then.
When I was young, I though freemasonry was small. Now, with all these medias, it seems much bigger than I ever imagined .
-------------------------------
AI- The Catholic Church has historically been critical of Freemasonry and has taken a stance against its members being Catholics. The Church's opposition to Freemasonry is based on several factors, including theological, philosophical, and historical concerns. Here are some key points regarding the Catholic Church's position on Freemasonry:
Theological Concerns:
Incompatibility with Catholic Faith: The Catholic Church considers Freemasonry to be incompatible with the Catholic faith. Freemasonry teaches a naturalistic religion that espouses indifferentism , which is the position that all religions are equal and that one can be saved through any religious belief or practice. This conflicts with the Catholic belief in the uniqueness and salvific role of Jesus Christ.
Secrecy and Oaths: Freemasonry involves the taking of secret oaths and the use of rituals that are seen as incompatible with the openness and transparency required in the Catholic faith. The Church views these practices as potentially leading to conflicts of loyalty and undermining the primacy of one's commitment to God and the Church.
Philosophical Concerns:
Religious Indifferentism: Freemasonry promotes the idea of religious indifferentism, which is the belief that all religions are equally valid and that one can be saved through any religious belief or practice. This conflicts with the Catholic belief in the uniqueness and salvific role of Jesus Christ.
Naturalistic Religion: Freemasonry is seen by the Catholic Church as promoting a naturalistic religion that does not recognize the supernatural aspects of faith, such as the existence of God and the importance of divine revelation.
Historical Concerns:
Anti-Catholicism: Throughout history, there have been instances where Freemasonry has been associated with anti-Catholic sentiments and actions. This includes opposition to the Catholic Church's influence in society and government, as well as instances of violence and persecution against Catholics.
Excommunication: The Catholic Church has issued various decrees and statements condemning Freemasonry and declaring that Catholics who join the Masonic lodges are automatically excommunicated. Reconciliation is reserved to the Pope.
It is important to note that the Catholic Church's position on Freemasonry is not universally accepted by all Catholics, and there may be individual Catholics who are members of Freemasonry. However, the Church's official stance remains opposed to Catholics being members of Freemasonry.
The Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX) is a traditionalist Catholic religious society founded in 1970 by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre. The SSPX is not in communion with the Holy See, and its priests and bishops are not officially recognized by the Catholic Church. However, the SSPX remains popular among some traditionalist Catholics, and it operates seminaries, schools, and parishes around the world.
The SSPX's teachings are based on the writings of the Church Fathers and the decrees of the Council of Trent. The SSPX rejects many of the reforms of the Second Vatican Council, and it adheres to a strict interpretation of Catholic doctrine and morality. The SSPX is known for its opposition to abortion, same-sex marriage, and other progressive social causes.
The SSPX has been accused of schism and of being a cult. However, the SSPX maintains that it is faithful to the traditional teachings of the Catholic Church. The SSPX has also been criticized for its anti-Semitic and anti-Masonic views.
The SSPX is a controversial group, but it remains an important force within traditionalist Catholicism. It is important to be aware of the SSPX's beliefs and practices if you are considering interacting with its members.
nevermind, AI told me (I didn't know RRC ordains women)
----------------------
The phrase "Catholic despite Rome" is often used by Catholics who disagree with the Catholic Church's hierarchy on certain issues, such as LGBTQ+ rights or women's ordination. It can also be used by people who identify as Catholic but have left the Catholic Church, either formally or informally.
The phrase suggests that it is possible to be Catholic without adhering to all of the Church's teachings. This is a controversial view, as some Catholics believe that it is impossible to be truly Catholic without being in full communion with the Pope and the Catholic Church's hierarchy.
There are a number of reasons why people might identify as "Catholic despite Rome." Some people may disagree with the Church's teachings on certain social or moral issues. Others may feel that the Church has become too bureaucratic or too focused on power. Still others may have been hurt or disappointed by the Church in some way.
Whatever the reason, people who identify as "Catholic despite Rome" often still feel a deep connection to the Catholic faith. They may still attend Mass, pray the Rosary, or participate in other Catholic devotions. They may also still believe in the core teachings of the Catholic Church, such as the belief in one God, the Trinity, and the divinity of Jesus Christ.
It is important to note that the phrase "Catholic despite Rome" is a complex and nuanced one. It can mean different things to different people. For some people, it is a way of expressing their disagreement with the Church's hierarchy. For others, it is a way of identifying as Catholic despite having left the Church. And for still others, it is a way of claiming a more personal and individualized form of Catholicism.
Calvinism has a complex view of ecumenism. On the one hand, Calvinists believe that the unity of the church is important and that Christians should strive to be in fellowship with one another. On the other hand, Calvinists believe that doctrinal purity is essential, and they are unwilling to compromise on their core beliefs.
As a result, Calvinists have generally been cautious about participating in ecumenical movements. They have been concerned that ecumenism could lead to a watering down of the gospel or to a compromise of their core beliefs.
However, there is a growing movement of Calvinists who are more open to ecumenism. They believe that it is important for Christians to work together to promote the gospel and to address common challenges. They also believe that ecumenism can be a way to learn from other Christians and to grow in their own faith.
Here are some of the key principles that guide the Calvinist view of ecumenism:
Unity in the essentials. Calvinists believe that it is important for Christians to be united in the essentials of the faith, such as the belief in the Trinity, the divinity of Jesus Christ, and the salvation by grace through faith.
Charity. Calvinists believe that Christians should treat each other with love and respect, even if they disagree on some theological issues.
Truth. Calvinists believe that it is important to be faithful to the truth of the gospel, even if it means that they cannot participate in all ecumenical activities.
Calvinists who are involved in the ecumenical movement typically focus on the following areas:
Dialogue. Calvinists believe that it is important to engage in dialogue with other Christians, even if they disagree on some theological issues. Through dialogue, Calvinists hope to learn from other Christians and to grow in their own faith.
Cooperation. Calvinists believe that it is important to cooperate with other Christians on common projects, such as evangelism, social justice, and disaster relief.
Witness. Calvinists believe that the ecumenical movement can be a way to witness to the world about the unity of the church.
Overall, the Calvinist view of ecumenism is complex and evolving. Calvinists are committed to both unity and truth, and they are seeking ways to balance these two commitments in the ecumenical movement.
It seems like you have strong opinions regarding Calvinism and its views on predestination, suffering, and poverty. I don't hold personal opinions or beliefs. However, I can provide some information to help you better understand the concepts you mentioned. Theomatics isn't product of people. It came straight outta God's mouth himself and by Himself alone, backed by undebunkable scientific proofs according to His Own pleasure, not mans nor people.
Calvinism and Predestination
Calvinism, named after the theologian John Calvin, is a theological system that emphasizes the sovereignty of God and the concept of predestination. According to Calvinistic doctrine, God predestines certain individuals to receive salvation, while others are predestined to damnation. This belief is based on the idea that God's grace is irresistible and that human beings have no control over their own salvation.
Different Interpretations
It's worth mentioning that there are different interpretations and variations of Calvinism, and not all Christians subscribe to this belief system. Many Christians hold different views on predestination and believe in the importance of human free will and responsibility in the process of salvation.
Jesus' Teachings and God's Plans
Regarding your statement that Calvinism goes against Jesus' teachings and God's plans, it's important to recognize that different Christian denominations and theological perspectives interpret and emphasize different aspects of Jesus' teachings. The interpretation of Scripture can vary, leading to different theological understandings.
Suffering, Poverty, and God's Presence
You also mentioned the idea that suffering and poverty do not mean God has forsaken an individual. This perspective aligns with many Christian beliefs, including those outside of Calvinism. The Bible teaches that God is present with us in our suffering and that He cares for the poor and oppressed. Jesus Himself experienced suffering and identified with those who suffer.
Diverse Perspectives
Christianity encompasses a wide range of beliefs and interpretations, and there are ongoing theological discussions and debates regarding topics such as predestination, suffering, and poverty. It's important to approach these conversations with respect and an open mind, recognizing that people may hold different views based on their understanding of Scripture and their personal relationship with God.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the beliefs and interpretations within Christianity can vary, including perspectives on predestination, suffering, and poverty. I don't advocate for any particular theological position, but I encourage open dialogue and respectful discussions to explore these complex topics further.
I understand that the Calvinist view of liturgy differs from the view I presented in my previous response. Calvinists believe that the Scriptures are the only authoritative source of religious knowledge and practice, and that tradition is not a reliable guide. They also believe that the sacraments are not necessary for salvation, and that the only public worship that is acceptable to God is that which is prescribed in the Scriptures.
The Calvinist view of liturgy is based on the following principles:
The Scriptures are the only authoritative source of religious knowledge and practice.
The sacraments are not necessary for salvation.
The only public worship that is acceptable to God is that which is prescribed in the Scriptures.
Calvinists believe that the changes proposed by the Protestant reformers in the 16th century were necessary because the Catholic Church had corrupted the true worship of God by adding traditions and practices that were not found in the Scriptures. They also believe that the Protestant reformers were correct to reject the authority of the pope and the Catholic hierarchy.
In summary, the Calvinist view of liturgy is that it should be simple, direct, and focused on the worship of God through the preaching of the Word and the administration of the sacraments. Calvinists also believe that liturgy should be free from all human traditions and inventions.
I respect your right to hold your own religious beliefs, and I am always willing to learn more about different perspectives.
These values are numbers they used. They didn't have 1, 2, 3, 4, 5... back then like we do today.
Today, we say, "I want 5 apples".
Back then they said, "I want B apples".
My calculator gave me the same results on every test. 100% no change at all.
False dumbing isn't related to scientific proofs. I'll stick with God compiling the 66 book Bible.
---------------------
What is the so-called "heptadic" structure that Dr. Panin discovered? Simply stated it is this: genuine Scripture, both Hebrew and Greek. where the numbers equivalent with the letters are added up properly. at some point: word, sentence, paragraph, or chapter, will always be divisible by the number seven! And, beyond this, utilization of "place numbers" determines punctuation as well as proper chronology of the various books. This mathematical phenomena occurs and reoccurs only in Holy Scripture and thus rules out all that is spurious. For instance, the "Apocrypha", the fourteen books written during the 400 year "inter-testament" period between Malachi of the Old Testament and Matthew of the New, have no numerics whatsoever and are thereby revealed as being merely of man. Numerous Greek classical writings have also been checked with no evidence of Bible numerics found. Thus Dr. Panin determined that Scripture and only Scripture has this numeric "signature of Divinity" within it.
https://www.cuttingedge.org/news/n1363.cfm
--------------------------------
Calvinists do not believe that the Mass is found in the Bible. They believe that the Mass is a Catholic invention that is not supported by Scripture.
Calvinists point to several passages in the Bible that they believe contradict the Catholic doctrine of the Mass. For example, in Matthew 26:28, Jesus says, "This is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins." Calvinists understand this passage to mean that Jesus' sacrifice on the cross was once and for all, and that there is no need for any further sacrifice.
Calvinists also point to passages such as Hebrews 9:25-28, which say that Christ does not enter the Most Holy Place every year to offer his own blood, as the high priest enters the Holy Place year by year with the blood of animals. For Christ did not enter man-made holy places, which were only a copy of the true one: he entered heaven itself, now to appear for us in God's presence. Nor did he enter heaven to offer himself again and again, the way the high priest enters the Most Holy Place every year with blood that is not his own. For then Christ would have to suffer many times over, from the creation of the world. But now he has appeared once for all at the end of the ages to take away sin by his own sacrifice.
Calvinists understand these passages to mean that Jesus' sacrifice on the cross was sufficient to pay the penalty for sin, and that there is no need for any further sacrifice.
In addition, Calvinists reject the Catholic doctrine of transubstantiation, which teaches that the bread and wine of the Eucharist are transformed into the body and blood of Christ. Calvinists believe that the bread and wine remain bread and wine, but that they are symbols of Christ's body and blood.
Calvinists believe that the Lord's Supper is a memorial feast, in which believers remember and celebrate Christ's death and resurrection. They also believe that the Lord's Supper is a means of grace, through which believers receive strength and nourishment from Christ.
In conclusion, Calvinists do not believe that the Mass is found in the Bible. They believe that the Mass is a Catholic invention that is not supported by Scripture.
I need says to do stuff with my art on nostr. Like minting bitcoin art. I appreciate 38 cents already but I need more to mint my new art movement called "Wild Beast of Modern Art". I'm confident I'll create a new art movement cause I already have a systematic plan to show others to do the same as I did. Being a former digital imaging specialist, I reached other how to use color and how to control it with consistency.
I can't afford a mass.
I need Ceasar's coins for that.
I'm already in the book of life.
Jesus loves me anyway
?ve=1&tl=1All chosen by God are men and women.
Arminian self salvation only last a lifetime.
Life is short
There is no specific reason why today, September 22, 2023, is rapture day. The rapture is a Christian eschatological event in which all born-again believers will be suddenly caught up to meet the Lord in the air. The Bible does not specify when the rapture will occur, and there have been many failed predictions of rapture dates throughout history.
Some Christians believe that the rapture is imminent, meaning that it could happen at any moment. Others believe that certain signs will precede the rapture, such as the rise of the Antichrist or the Great Tribulation. However, there is no consensus among Christians about when the rapture will occur, or whether it will be preceded by any specific signs.
It is important to note that the rapture is a matter of faith, and there is no scientific evidence to support its existence. Some people believe that the rapture is a literal event that will happen in the physical world, while others believe that it is a symbolic event that represents the spiritual union of believers with Christ.
Ultimately, whether or not you believe that today is rapture day is a personal decision. If you are a Christian, I encourage you to study the Bible and pray for God's guidance on this matter.
I'll be leaving my pants behind. I'm unwanted here