Can you point to any evidence that Russia helped Trump that isn't effectively, "trust this expert"?
Cuz it doesn't look overwhelming to me, and that doesn't look like independent thinking to me.
Idk what's going on
I didn't really get how that makes Hoppe an idiot... Weaker currencies must hyperinflate ; that's just how they die...
OMG OMG FUTURISTIC CLOAK THINGY I NRED THIS
https://techwearstorm.com/products/japanese-techwear-hoodie-motosu
Ya know, there could be good things if fiat wins... The Dark Ages had cloaks. And daggers! We could bring back cloaks in the next Dark Age 🤔
I'm one of the injured from the vaccine... In case anyone thinks its a Russian hoax or something. Real person, right here.
Certain influencers get promoted, and certain voices get pushed down. Its not quality that draws audiences - its just what contacts the most people. Advertising, visibility, algorithms. He's popular because someone wants him to be popular.
I would agree, except that I don't believe anything coming from Tim Pool. Not only is he annoying, but if I had to pick one candidate influencer as most likely a spook or controlled opposition, its him.
But I do agree with the general sentiment of Fuck Leftists, leftists are the most dangerous people, they cannot be tolerated.
Why would I read past "dipshit?" I haven't. I was courteous to you, and continue to be courteous now, letting you know that you're in error. You have proven the fact that low IQ people cannot be morally good.
Someone who accepts accusations as reality without personally investigating and forming his own opinions is scum of the earth. That wouldn't be you, would it?
It's hard to believe this was written by a 26 year old - on paper! What 26 year old talks like this?
"I do apologize for any strife of traumas but it had to be done."
"Frankly, these parasites simply had it coming."
It could be that...it's a planted fake. Because he went to an expensive college cops thought this is how he'd write.
https://open.substack.com/pub/kenklippenstein/p/luigis-manifesto?r=fzft7&utm_medium=ios
I don't like the fact that I agree with that "manifesto."
I'm going to continue believing its fake until I see him admit to it. I'll also need good reason to believe any video of him isn't AI generated.
Side note : I doubt any concept of a justice system can coexist with AI. Combine AI with criminals in government, and basically the world belongs to whoever is the least scrupulous.
drivechains are just anchored shitcoins, like ordinals or other shit
i dunno what the stuff involved is, probably nostr:npub180cvv07tjdrrgpa0j7j7tmnyl2yr6yr7l8j4s3evf6u64th6gkwsyjh6w6 would be something of an expert on this, even though it is not going to change the main consensus to be better
today i sorta see where he is coming from about this, like it's some kind of attempt to reassert sanity after several major compromises on the main chain
because if you fork it, and are on the minority, you probably will end up being a bcash or bsv
so it's some kind of a hedge going on
i think the solution lies in finding how to work with what is, without changing the protocol, and if your work-around acquires substantial economic value, it will act as drag against other changes that are shitty
so there is many layers of complexity to understanding it
if support for *specific* drivechains are aimed at creating a drag on introducing dumbshit to the main chain, i'm all for that as well, but you see how many levels of abstraction we are going to here, it's getting positively byzantine
The shitcoininess makes me nervous. Still reading/watching. But it seems like it doesn't necessarily tie in shitcoins, but only potentially does. IMO the security budget only matters while Fiat exists - at some point, if security is good enough to get us there, sats mined will be sufficient inticement to mine no matter what amount they are, simply because that's the total throughput for the economy.
But low fees means miner centralization, simply because low margins cause consolidation in industries. So IMO, F'ing with block size was retarded. I want more people mining. And I'm being a hypocrite in that regard... But anyways. The only thing I think needs to be "fixed" is the speed of transactions. A second layer is the correct solution because the speed of transactions needs not be the speed of settlement. IMO, blocks should be mined even slower... Much slower. I don't want a Mars Coin, Venus Coin, and Jovian League Coin competing with Bitcoin in 1000 years. That can be prevented by slowing blocks by a few hours, which gives miners a chance to monetize energy anywhere in the inner solar system. But I've gotten off topic... I guess there are two things I think need to be fixed. But only tx speed is important in this century. And block size, since they F'd with it. 3 things. It stops there!
Can I support bip300 drivechains with my node now? If so, this will be the first time I've tried using my node selectively for the ruleset... And idk how to do it... But so far, from my 3.5 minutes of research, I like it and am willing to learn new things because of it
I searched it - I remember the term coming up a couple years ago but didn't deep dive. I see Adam Back had good things to say about it... Its crazy how much of my thinking about bitcoin I outsource to his opinions...
Ha, I was able to search about it without that, I felt like it was a victory. Love that 80s rock sound










