🫂

GM 🌏🤗🫂☕💙

😍😍😍💙🫂

Giving up is a wonderful power.

We have to enjoy this.

If we think of it as a bad thing, when we give up, we may not feel the freedom given by the chain that comes out of our lives.

This is something to be celebrated.

It is necessary not to put another chain in its place by experiencing mental stagnation.

Happy good day 🌏🫂🤗💙

Can't we register on Primal.net?

Is it just stats?

I use NOSTR more than computer.

I want to send emojis too :))

iris.to also had emojis.

But not anymore.

I am looking for a new place.

Do you have any suggestions?

Hello 👋 : )

😂😂

🫂💙

can you see my zap?

GN 🫂

Just because it will never happen doesn't mean we won't defend it.

Let's defend what we think is right. Of course, we will continue to live in this disgusting world. Because the majority will never be able to live harmlessly like single-celled organisms. They will make the world hell with rules and prohibitions :)

At least I will continue to defend what I see right :)

Your life, your choice.

Bans may be to your liking.

I never loved. I can understand the truth. And I don't do them.

For example: My reason for not being a murderer is not because of fear of punishment. Because it's wrong.

I say that if the rules, or prohibitions, had guided people to the truth, there would not have been so much violence. And this is my observation about the 3 platforms.

This is my own experience.

Is it stupid?

Alright. I'm stupid.

I'm happy to be an idiot who doesn't like prohibitions :)))

It's something I've advocated for years. There shouldn't be rules. So bans.

How can people live in harmony when there are no bans :)

There are fewer fights than in systems with bans.

The best example of this is the world of NOSTR. 🫶

The Bluesky environment is less prescriptive than Twitter. But (my list) I witness so many fights...

Apart from that, "they should come, these should not come" discussions.

Attempts to emulate everyone.

In my belief "people cannot determine the sacred".

That is, I would be mistaken in my belief if I said that they have right to determine the sacred

They don't have to believe it, of course.

So they can identify the scriptures. (So they don't have to respect my faith).

But if I respect their sanctity, I will again be wrong in my belief.

That's why I don't show respect.

But they expect respect for their holy ones.

So they expect me to reject my own faith.

These holinesses exist not only in Christians, but also in Muslim Jews and Atheists.

This has nothing to do with religion.

For example, marriage. States, religious groups, political groups, etc. For many, it is a sacred institution.

To me, they are a diabolical institution.

I cannot show respect.

But they are waiting. They are challenging. Law is with them. They punish.

Respect for my faith? So respect my faith in not respecting the holy?

No respect. There is punishment : )

I watched one of my old videos :)) (2017)

It's super :))

I forgot that I took this video.

If I included this video in yesterday's Bluesky discussions, I think they would go crazy :)))

🫤🫂

I didn't know how I repost this..

Are those who do not respect the saints at fault or those who expect respect for the holy?

What if the other person's belief is not to respect other saints, then whose belief will be respected?

Can the other person's belief be respected without giving up on his/her own?

🥳🤗🫂💙