Avatar
Colby Serpa
59cacbd83ad5c54ad91dacf51a49c06e0bef730ac0e7c235a6f6fa29b9230f02
Merge fields, every discipline is a branch of nature… nature is the only industry.

Anyone interested in helping us with the decentralized GitHub? We know what to do and can guide you. DM if interested.

Twitter with character limit is much more fun. It’s like a mental exercise, trying to distill meaning succinctly.

Interesting nostr:note1dqguxcxauqqtj3qhyv6d4fs0qh88j0jes27lvhgsqjvteszsdwgqwanrcn

“I hold this, zap! Straight out the box, no joke

Deadly as a runaway stampede or lightning bolt in Summertime

Big as a Bumblebee sting and quicker to bring strife”

First, a place to speak and code.

Next… everything 🌌

Sorry bot, I don’t want your airdrop. 🤖🧿

Albeit, voting does seem incredibly insecure from an attack-vector perspective — but voting is all about securely issuing KYC, which is the antithesis of cryptography’s history. Systems like ION are better than government-issued KYC, but allowing anyone to be an issuer doesn’t really solve the Sybil problem in fraudulent voting systems.

Tracking the budget of a country with on-chain transparency is interesting, but verifying each “purchase” still happens outside of the digital realm — politicians often lie about what the money is used for, even if the funds are sent to the correct destination on-chain.

Therefore, I think it’s best never to conflate the innovations in cryptography with improving governance — as so many in Web3 have done before.

Real protocols are securely automated.

Protocols do not improve the ability for humans to govern. Every shitcoin with a governance mechanism is doomed.

Protocols are meant to replace the inefficiencies of human decision-making — making governance of digital contracts, money, and the internet unnecessary. They reduce burden for governments and citizens by replacing the need for litigation with cryptographic proof.