Avatar
Milky
5a89da85bd0f6222aae9883c741eb69309dd669648cef2d42fd7e3df8e16fd19
🏔️Stay grounded and stack zaps ⚡️ Abundance | Discernment | Action | Moral systems Uninterrupted views

“Most revolutionaries are better at manifestos than maintenance.” That is genius, did you make that up??

Value for Value sounds easy on the surface, but there are so many layers of accountability. To ourselves and each other; and also in regards to telling the truth (to ourselves more than anything), of how much is this value worth to me in the future.

Greenhouses are so fuckin cool. Nice little dinner party with friends and family, some star gazing afterwards ✨

STAY HUMBLE AND STACK YIN! STUPID ASS INFLUUUENCERS.

(Disclaimer: If you buy Bitcoin, it’s not enough to just stack more Bitcoin. Defend yourself from horny influencers who forget to stay humble. Stay solvent longer than their egos can remain horny.)

AI is the Yang, Bitcoin is the Yin.

AI has ~infinite room to scale, Bitcoin’s layer 1 has a fixed throughput. So as AI expands endlessly into digital and physical realms, Bitcoin anchors to a fixed supply.

AI demands exponential energy, Bitcoin takes whatever energy it can find. Thus AI is “hungry”, Bitcoin represents “acceptance.”

AI has statistical hallucinations, Bitcoin has cryptographic certainty. In this way AI generates plausible realities, Bitcoin is reality and verifies reality.

AI has ephemeral outputs, Bitcoin a perpetual ledger. Thus while AI is fluid and adaptive, Bitcoin is static and enduring.

AI serves optimization and creation, Bitcoin serves preservation and verification. Thus AI is promethean fire, Bitcoin is digital gravity.

An unchecked yang (AI) risks energy gluttony, loss of meaning and infinite fake realities. An isolated yin (Bitcoin) risks stagnation as a pure store-of-value with limited globally distributed utility. Their opposition may be completeness, and we may have found our cosmological friend!

Cats love to zig and zag.

Pura Vida.

Replying to Avatar Contra

There’s something deeply cynical about politicians who declare “America is a Christian nation” while their own lives tell a different story. JD Vance says Christianity is America’s Creed, yet he’s married to a Hindu and celebrates Hanukkah with his family. I’m not questioning his marriage or his respect for other faiths. I’m questioning the authenticity of his public theology.

As a reformed Christian, I believe America’s founding was deeply shaped by Christian ethics and moral reasoning. That’s a historical reality we can trace through the documents, debates, and institutions our founders created. But there’s a massive difference between acknowledging that influence and weaponizing faith for electoral advantage.

When politicians suddenly discover the language of Christian nationalism at precisely the moment it polls well with their base, we have an obligation to call it what it is: pandering. They’re not defending the faith. They’re using it as a vehicle to power.

The gospel doesn’t need politicians to protect it. It needs believers who live with integrity, who refuse to let our most sacred convictions become just another campaign strategy. When faith becomes nothing more than a demographic to capture, we’ve lost something essential.

I’d rather have a leader who lives their convictions quietly and inconsistently than one who performs them loudly while calculating their next move. At least the first one isn’t treating my faith like a focus group finding.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

Very well written and thought out! And the fact that he feels so comfortable to take that position given his personal receipts. There is a desperation, a lack of substance and integrity, a view of the electorate as fools.

GOOD MORNING LAST COFFEE IN PURA VIDA LAND FOR A WHILE

P.S. BEEN READING ABOUT BEEKEEPERS AND LONGEVITY, MIGHT FUCK AROUND’N’FIND OUT