Avatar
yunginter.net
5fd693e61a7969ecf5c11dbf5ce20aedac1cea71721755b037955994bf6061bb
Zach

this toggle does exist… I have everything set to basic dark, but might start keeping different colors for different accounts.

themes b, express yourself.

It does tho. All my google apps follow system settings.

it hurt upgrading basically the same week they took zaps, but I’m hitting way less ‘ can’t do that’s ‘ then I expected moving to arm. I had held out since 2012.

😂 even oracles is like, yah we kno.

I’ve been using UTM because they have a side-loadable iOS version

I felt this way but wasn’t sure if it was skill issue on my part 😅

Replying to Avatar yunginter.net

That's not a bad idea. This concept might be better described as a Profit Share or Revenue-Sharing with Referral Programs. In a v4v system there is non-monetary exchanges involved, such as creating clips of a podcast, which earns the contributor and the podcaster sats. Some extreme V4V advocates want this process to be an automatic transaction. The non-monetary aspect lies in creating the clip.

In the mega client realm, integrating new features allows contributors to influence the ever-evolving project. Skill exchange comes into play, replacing financial contributions with pull requests to support the project. Mentoring less capable contributors is advantageous, as they may provide future support. If their training benefits them beyond this project, they could become valuable monetary contributors. Automating the split in such scenarios is challenging, but the V4V concept of non-monetary contributions is already in practice today.

Currently, what seems to be failing is relying on "one-time donations." Crowdfunding or virtual-event-based approaches might be more successful, with time-bound goals. It may not necessarily need to be a return of monetary value; access to certain vanity domains or badges could be an alternative. Time-sensitive announcements could improve donation outcomes.

Recurring donations would be ideal, but LNBC has limitations in this regard from my limited understanding.

In the past, I confused the difference between Pay-What-You-Want (PWYW) and Name Your Own Price (NYOP).

PWYW is similar to "one-time donations" or simply relying on customer goodwill.

On the other hand, Name Your Own Price could involve offering a range with a minimum or a suggested starting point. Combining NYOP with crowdfunding goals can give contributors perspective on the operational costs might be a good option.

For the extreme version of V4V, image hosting is an intriguing. There could be a flow from a paid client to the image services, and this process could be automated based on individual uploads and serves. The idea is to have varying compensation based on the number of serves. This flow could potentially address some issues with recurring payments, as only one party needs to handle that aspect. Clients could also offer instead of a monthly subscription, individual micro transactions for each post. The micro-transaction system and nodes processing the transactions would also receive value for their contributions to this mutual exchange of value, along with the relay, client, and content. In a system like this, it doesn’t pay to lurk.

One thing I just thought of, that could be a huge breakthrough and opportunity for both nostr address services and nostr… is figuring out how to gift before keys are is generated. The nostr address service could be the liaison/market place for multiple gifted paid relays, attached to an address that yet has an npub, and then retroactively link it when the new person onboards.

That's not a bad idea. This concept might be better described as a Profit Share or Revenue-Sharing with Referral Programs. In a v4v system there is non-monetary exchanges involved, such as creating clips of a podcast, which earns the contributor and the podcaster sats. Some extreme V4V advocates want this process to be an automatic transaction. The non-monetary aspect lies in creating the clip.

In the mega client realm, integrating new features allows contributors to influence the ever-evolving project. Skill exchange comes into play, replacing financial contributions with pull requests to support the project. Mentoring less capable contributors is advantageous, as they may provide future support. If their training benefits them beyond this project, they could become valuable monetary contributors. Automating the split in such scenarios is challenging, but the V4V concept of non-monetary contributions is already in practice today.

Currently, what seems to be failing is relying on "one-time donations." Crowdfunding or virtual-event-based approaches might be more successful, with time-bound goals. It may not necessarily need to be a return of monetary value; access to certain vanity domains or badges could be an alternative. Time-sensitive announcements could improve donation outcomes.

Recurring donations would be ideal, but LNBC has limitations in this regard from my limited understanding.

In the past, I confused the difference between Pay-What-You-Want (PWYW) and Name Your Own Price (NYOP).

PWYW is similar to "one-time donations" or simply relying on customer goodwill.

On the other hand, Name Your Own Price could involve offering a range with a minimum or a suggested starting point. Combining NYOP with crowdfunding goals can give contributors perspective on the operational costs might be a good option.

For the extreme version of V4V, image hosting is an intriguing. There could be a flow from a paid client to the image services, and this process could be automated based on individual uploads and serves. The idea is to have varying compensation based on the number of serves. This flow could potentially address some issues with recurring payments, as only one party needs to handle that aspect. Clients could also offer instead of a monthly subscription, individual micro transactions for each post. The micro-transaction system and nodes processing the transactions would also receive value for their contributions to this mutual exchange of value, along with the relay, client, and content. In a system like this, it doesn’t pay to lurk.

tictactok

nostr:note1wc7a6tmzq0kf6cf4pf7j08x3kqcvsmf2uzzj3tfc87dfkerpkpmqsf7qq0

Replying to Avatar zach

#ballstr

was that in Chicago? cause my astros ain’t in Houston.

I still can’t believe I’m the only person who’s thanked the based god on nostr #tybg

https://youtu.be/OfMvQ9TmJTc

speaking of assholes I saw someone comparing a literal gaping asshole to tits, and expressed that moderation was uneven, I thought that was an incredibly interesting moral dilemma despite not being pro moderation.

fair, but no one’s like reacting to you rebuilding that there on here the way when it’s mentioned here we’re talking about the radials making that hard for y’all to just have pre 2015 twitter back.

don’t worry these memes are still gadsden not Nike’s and smiley.

if you just hate Tesla guy you go to threads. bluesky has the hard core social justice experts, not just virtue signaling progressives (well maybe the dev team), but the hard core radicals.

one thing about nostr is boomers will hop into conversations with aesthetic people talking about free speech and assume that we are against them.