isssue isn’t that they should have the right to display it how they want… there should be a preferred_name tag so a client could choose to respect that, currently they don’t know what editor you used, and don’t know how it was presented (because the field label is never the actual tag) and the expectation that sets.
even if it was just one image relay that was operating in a nostr native way, that would allow other relays to spin up… I’d be much more likely to pay for premium services from that.
I don’t have a better idea. And there really isn’t a different between xyz monitoring his/her nostr branded image hosting server and monitoring that stored as a relay from an illegal content perspective.
I noticed you defaulted to speaking about images, tik tok is 15-60 seconds but does now allow up to 10 minutes. Is the relay software the same for an image relay, as it is for a 60 second video relay, as it is for 1080p 10 minutes, as it is for 3 hour long 4k videocasts? Maybe the latter, or latter two is torrents stored on relays? Could it/should it all be encrypted and thus dissolve some liability on the relay runner? Maybe they are separate nips and not separate protocols… but does everything that wants to load these decentralized images/video need to be a nostr client? Does that hinge the success or failure of one to the other in an unfortunate way?
I really dislike this list in iMessage but if you hard/long press the plus you go straight to camera roll #ios17 
dashboard has been dead, and they added widgets to desktop,
but standby is basically just dashboard for iOS #ios17 #sonoma
Decentralized media hosting is probably something a separate protocol should solve really well first. Nostr can be the algorithmic or lack of algorithmic social layer.
Tik tok works not just because of the consumption algorithm, but their highly suggestive capture medium and editing suite. You can byo camera and editing suite, but there is an highly suggestive standard of deliverable. Just offering vertical scrolling video isn’t enough to culturally coerce cohesiveness of the deliverable, and that comes long before sorting them algorithmic.ly
It’s not a nostr problem, it’s a bitcoin problem. eth adjacent social exists. But identifying as a user of fiat is silly, and adopting that culturally for bitcoin is the only way forward for bitcoin. #YouAreNotABitcoin
anywhere that is willing to host long video and allow embedding and in line playing with out rate limiting… depending on the nature of the content, it might be better for the content to host this in more traditional places, as long as it’s accessible/playable in most nostr clients too.
more like decentralized fandom less like decentralized wikipedia please
it’s 630 and the sun not out yet, nah
shareable mute lists are inevitable, but a horrible idea. Verify, even who you mute.
you are not a bitcoin. nostr is a technology, not a community. Culturally nostr actively fights against this notion, and this explains the adoption numbers.
ackchyually, sound and light are factual, indeed from a perspective, but a replicable one that others can observe, not opinions. The ability to replicate and observe that perspective is the truth.
I meant just natively on habla/npub, that the custom modules could be reused.
gm nostr
you can customize your page with cards in zap.stream, should we NIP this?
https://void.cat/d/VxENScSyrgJDzFswhBCfZJ.webp
is there a way this could be repurposed to highlight and categorize habla articles?
This would be so useful for nip 23 as well



