Avatar
John Smith
611fdaed5ef0ec4f075ab5c55c803225e33762c4e8b543ca6613c6270bda2bf4

then better find better methods cuase nobody will follow current ones.

doesn't matter if climate change is real or not as long as it doesn't improve current standards of living most ppl won't care.

most will trade any "future disaster" for a "current enjoyment/survival"

One good start might be stop using climate change as an umbrella term for a lot of stuff. It's like calling nazis to the right, that won't just make ppl care + each individual problem under the "climate change" umbrella has different causes and potential solutions.

Should we stop using fossil fuels to reduce CO2 emission? is that the best solution? does higher CO2 levels cause enough damage to use such a nuclear solution? current "alternative" electricity generations actually work? if they don't work, is it right to ban use of energy?

CO2 levels are a single thing

plastic waste is another problem, with different nature, more centered around comsumption of wasted full low time preference products that brake too quickly and are not repaired. It's confusion and distracting to put these two under a single umbrela term such as "climate change"

a more focus aproach at indivual problems will work much better.

or finding a constant that units all or a group of problems.

IMO inflation is that thing, people can't care about the future when money doesn't work. They consume without any moment stoping to think if there's any better use for money since it's melting in their hands.

same goes for other aspects of life.

TLDL focus dividing problems into smaller parts that actually can be solved + fuck inflation

we won't starve for it tho.

here in a poor country time and time again some fucking EU guys come shitting on us "eating too much meat" or "having oil fields" or "using carbon to generate electricity"

50% of the population here lives under 2 U$D per day

go fuck your climate change policies

if they mean starving here we won't follow them

better make it possible before demanding other to die for it

idk.

current high fees are cause shitcoiners and fooling around.

I'd love to see a point where fees represent a high enough % of miners income by people using BTC to transact. Current point is not that.

They will blow themselves up and fees will come back down.

not saying fees will never be enough, just a matter of having enough people using BTC in a daily basics

the only part. There's other air-gap wallets / signing devices

well currently fee rates are really high D:

https://mempool.space/

so if u want wo withdraw you pay around 8,200 sats for next block confirm

and network is purging any transaction lower than 2.4 sat/vbite so around 500 but might takes days to confirm

it's.

It allows both LN and on chain with draws. onchain is just current miners rates and you can input desired rate if network is busy and prefer to wait yet pay a lower fee.

Replying to Avatar Ryan

#Zapril

zaps it the way, or atleast left a comment on why u liked it

Hold my mate

"The Government of Jujuy [Argentina], headed by Emperador Gerardo Morales I, gave the Argentine Army 20 llamas to facilitate operational movement in high mountain areas and improve logistics in the fight against drug trafficking."