61
woolcycle
6181c0e31cdf29aeeefcaf5658faa1cb4ad1db69d38b4a938cfaa0fd8103f67b

Thanks for sharing your #Nostr client and browser picks! I am looking forward to streamlining my own choices - I am replying from Chrome but zapping you from Brave, as that is where the wallet is. Have a good evening!

Is Kiwi on Windows and preferable in some ways to the others?

Thanks! Can I ask if you have had issues running Primal in any browsers? I often can't seem to follow or reply on Brave/Windows. Primal in Firefox & Chrome seems to work OK.

How do you feel about using a different layer 1 alongside BTC, provided the end result is more performant, obviously.

Thanks for clarifying. Also, your whole note is fascinating, your clear differentiation of computer code and human language. One particular issue I am interested in is how Bitcoin-only mentality reconciles with individualism and innovation.

Replying to Avatar Laeserin

1) Human speech is not machine code. It doesn't need to compile and run dynamically. It has no merge conflicts.

It doesn't need git. Not everything needs git.

2) Small errors and invented words allow speech to naturally evolve, over time. That is one way that vocabulary expands and adapts to the current time and environment, and it fuels a sense of community to share this "new, local vocabulary".

3) It also encourages more people to write, as they know that their errors or local dialects will be glossed over and the readers will focus on their core message.

4) If someone worries about typos, let them use a client with a spell-check. (I'm sure the people implementing note-policing also took the time to implement a spell-check, right?)

5) Not everything needs to be a "community-approved idea". Novel or controversial ideas are often offensive. Offensive people are often creative and ingenuitive. Those individuals also have free speech rights and should be allowed to speak their truth freely, without being harrassed.

6) Debates have value. Replying to an idea, rather than demanding it be rewritten, creates a conversation in the public square, and allows people who are being harrassed and intimidated to be defended by their friends. Much wickedness occurs in darkness.

7) Kind 01 notes were the universal note and all clients were designed to specialize in their display. Changing that dynamic shouldn't be a spontaneous, unilateral decision by a large provider. Which is why I have left that provider, for wantonly abusing a market position.

8) Do not offer a doorway to tyrannical impulses. That door will always be opened. We have all come to know that software developers can become tyrants. That is why we are here.

9) Merely because it has become technologically possible to do something, doesn't mean that other clients or users are forced to accept it. Expect there to be "free speech clients" and "anti-forker filters" coming soon, and those feeds will contain different displays of notes than on the conformist apps.

10) Again: This is the original note. There is no other version of this note and there will not be another version.

I am late to this issue and puzzled as to which provider is being referred to in point 7, and presumably this whole note - care to clarify?

#Nostr #Primal is there an issue with some zaps sent not showing in the Primal wallet transaction history? As this is what I am experiencing on iPadOS.

Which client has those features, circled in your screenshot?