By measuring only the correlation between the angle of attention between two isolated subjects housed adjacently, one could (?) either demonstrate reasonable grounds for further study or rule out wide swaths of paranormal conjecture. IOW record the slope on two dimensions of the angle eyes point from pupil to focal point. Do humans in proximity tend to look up simultaneously? At some star? At each other? Toward a shared concern? Identical twin test next, with or without growing up together.
Yeah. Exactly. Most of us just want to learn words at the talking layer but if you want to break it down
It's the most plausible rationalization for plunder.
refrigerator poetry vibe
Any number of devices that see them can observe to match objective characteristics to send an open, publicly visible standard notification of agreement/disagreement as one of a multifactor authentication.
One can create a music scene and develop a marketable image. And it even has precedence in the market. But it will be vulnerable to capture, suffer attrition in inverse proportion to enlightenment among listeners, and become an ever heavier cape over time. A character is more replaceable than an authentic individual. Loyalty to the man, or loyalty to the costume? Reflect self truly is to be best.
A series of currency coins for circulation. All are the same size but vary in copper, silver, gold content. Standard design with small earth in center in most valuable metal. Serials for vanity addresses.
What I say is not what I am, much less how you interpret it. I think that's why trust systems with authentic-ated communication work best.
I’ve gotten solid feedback on this episode of nostr:npub10qrssqjsydd38j8mv7h27dq0ynpns3djgu88mhr7cr2qcqrgyezspkxqj8 with nostr:npub13ndpm2hm9hud4azsq5euhf5mv3d05r90wymwxsd7rdn29609hhvqp60svh (and of course some saying they didn’t like it one bit).
I’ve learned that the vast majority of Bitcoiners just want moonboi Bitcoin NGU hopium mixed with macro death-of-the-dollar doom porn. How do I know this? Because I see which episodes get the most traction. Bitcoiners may say they want “different guests and opinions” on Bitcoin podcasts, but their actions tell a very different story… The numbers are clear. That’s why even though Saylor has done 69,420 podcasts and everyone has listened to countless hours of him, the majority of people will still watch any new Saylor conversation over some lesser-known person. This isn’t a dig on Saylor, it’s just reality.
That said, if you are one of the minority of Bitcoiners who enjoys having your preconceived notions challenged, and have the ability to approach uncomfortable topics with an open mind, I encourage you to check out this conversation with John. nostr:note1fvl8j0z6saesc7jx329cp4rqvgfu6pevfwtrvwsw50udmtc0czssjylvf5
Do we have real numbers on that or just YouTube Spotify type numbers?
Big tithing would have us believe those things are separate. There is only experience, information, how we assimilate those into worldview, the language we choose to describe it, and the resulting actions we take.
Yup, Elon is too moderate
Winstr Churchstrich: "You have muters? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life."
Great idea. Plus Zapsplits informed by wot, defense against answer farming only to reward to friends or sockpuppets.
Hey kids, didja know