Group chats that require 100% vote to admit a new member or to boot an existing. Display those who have requested in and those who have been recommended by members for new membership, so that they can be voted on. Secession rights to stop notifications or for any reason.
Feels funny. Screenshot sharing would make it moot. Compartmentalized friendships and social asymmetry.
A client that requires user to fact check something in their domain during login, then to rate the job someone else did on theirs.
Something between the tabs I've opened to look at later this week, aggregation, and wot, is interesting
Each day's round of GM with its own hashtag(?)date(?) And each mention to include also a reference to the actionable daily world changing act that you put into reality to lead by example.
No I just think we enter an era where global reach with credibility doesn't exist alongside evil.
Could filtering be a request? 1 "view the npubs that searched for singles in your city" 2 "choose which npubs will receive yours"
Not psyop phoniness. Real social emotional disruption, peaceful, wistful, sad, but real. Masks drop, we share in emotional disturbance as we integrate the reality of the nature of many we've trusted and venerated. We'll learn that we needed to stand up for ourselves but in large part didn't, while surprising ourselves with our capacity to forgive those who seek true redemption, and healing ourselves with their lessons honestly shared. My generation will watch as its sons and daughters rocket past in all spectrums, unbound, unhindered, and free - it will be known as the last crisis, the last, ironically, because of global digital access and awareness. Now, though, with privacy rights guaranteed by design. Maybe
Moving portraits of those who superficially would not be expected to exist peacefully together. Warm faces with wisdom and character enjoying each other despite external pressure to maintain artificial divisions of humanity.
Or at least an Airbnb camping resort town vacation summer camp team building thing
Gnu free, let me know if you need different dimensions
Government would be so mad if it knew how much god I've found in bitcoin.
Feature: Ability to signify that one's enterprise is currently self sustaining / positive sum, such that any charity involved, though still welcomed, can likely have more effect elsewhere.
What implications does this have if dividing sats by decimals, ultimately, anyway? That's a question, not an activist statement guised as one.
I agree we should aim to optimize as the best money, but would by default assume any concession of principle that aims to do so to be most likely to be short sighted. After all, we have principles because they predict outcomes better than forecasting. As to context, I'm not actually being adversarial to the specifics, only highlighting the generalized counter point for edification:
When 'rigid axiomatic rule prohibits' I agree let's not 'let perfect be the enemy of the good', but I would simply add that the cautionary counter point to *that* then is 'system failure and injustice often begin with rationalized concessions of principle'
I agree but would say that ackshually the sale is the side effect of getting information where it needs to go or matching need to solution, so a system like that would incentive and optimize for mutually beneficial transactions. I see and love the vision of wot curations and recommendations dynamically building shop pages in context.
Feature: a protocol for defining recurring zap patterns. Zap post once. Zap mower twice/month until winter. Autopay with cosign. Rain fibbonacci fossly
Proof of kickflip
https://blossom.primal.net/cbee4ac51f1d41b96d2a34933931063686bdfcf53400bc2fb77f700c03af314d.mov
nevent1qqs9hm6wngunvsgw0xlxs6hguxsf8mvzaw5ylhz5l433jce0y97dpwgpramhxue69uhkzarvv9ejumn0wd68ytnvv9hxgtmfdemx76trv4es9k03au
Still, got it, love it!
Which is to say something true but not specific - the right thing to do still depends on the details. That this principle exists, relevant, but it shouldn't be a foot in the door for rationalizing what is not a good choice on its own merits.
The reward for publishing false information
The degree to which it credibly can be redacted as an innocent mistake
The gullibility of the regulators (market)
The probability or average cost of enduring consequences
Cold calc bro
I'd say increase certainty. Certainty that relays saw the post, much less relatives and friends. Certainty that shadowcensor doesn't happen. Big picture of network helps. Oh, I'm looking at this cluster of notes over here. It's an objective global agreed view I can depend on, anxiety goodbye! Personally, I would (I think) post things 1/1000 people would enjoy forever, if I'm getting a fair shake. If I can't even be sure my fam can see it when i @ them, I lose interest. Disclaimer, I'm not a good test market like Gary, Indiana.
'You want to know how much our efforts have become the fabric of humanity? Our nodes found 4 blocks in the 2020's. Sure, the reward itself is essentially a rounding error, and we operate bitcoin nodes at a loss. But underpinning the network on which our reborn phoenix freedom economy is based? Priceless. We think our customers will agree and support us through the next century as well. '