Avatar
pebble (b/acc)
63de0772cbedce4f592316bc7b031f8b2dfbdc758f56c4fb39a88c5bfaceb078

npub1az9xj85cmxv8e9j9y80lvqp97crsqdu2fpu3srwthd99qfu9qsgstam8y8

Finally looking at https://github.com/espressif/esp-now because SatsLink

When this says Wi-FI, does it mean the 802.11 protocol or the 2.4GHz band?

Do you know of any good ESP-Now devices that have eternal antennas? Like SMA or something?

How does this relate to LoRa stuff?

How do I make this into a gameboy but with nostr so it can use zaps too?

#askNostr

CC: npub1ya20ep3dd0qt0suhzprxztv5y43arqwps73ercvqa44sp7qw0edsp4x9ty npub1mxrssnzg8y9zjr6a9g6xqwhxfa23xlvmftluakxqatsrp6ez9gjssu0htc

+1 for LoRa module. ESP-NOW is raw 802.11.

Sign up for a service that allows you to create a phone prompt.

Make it say something like "To reach ______, press 1."

If button is pressed, forward the call to your cell. Very few scammers will get through and you have wasted the effort of those who do.

Also remember that we are bad at understanding exponential growth, such as is common in technology.

It's a very roundabout way to allow for monitoring and control.

"Impaired driving prevention technology systems that passively monitor drivers’ performance, detect whether a driver is impaired and prevent or limit operation if the system detects impairment."

The trick is that an executive agency needs to publish guidance on what is acceptable to satisfy the law. This could mean video uploaded to the government as a requirement for compliance.

cc nostr:npub1qny3tkh0acurzla8x3zy4nhrjz5zd8l9sy9jys09umwng00manysew95gx

Yes, but the amount of energy needed to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than that needed to produce it.

I think you mean that all network messages will be passed between bitcoin and lightning nodes. This way, every message must have a value attached to it.

Communication rails in the future internet will take place over dedicated physical links between lightning nodes.

There is an app that uses lightning as a transport already. https://sphinx.chat

Thank you for clarifying.

You're right. Just like Adam Back's email proof of work proposal.

Such an integration would come at the network level. All Yggdrasil nodes, for example, would need to not pass a packet unless there is a proof of work attached with similar difficulty to other packets. This is the only way to reduce spam.

I don't see how this blends in with monetization of maintaining the network however. Would there also need to be routing fees, or is a computer network just considered a community investment at this point?

The Yggdrasil Network project is a very good alternative to the current internet. It needs a way to integrate with LN so nodes can be paid for the traffic they proxy.

The software provides a wide-area ipv6 network on top of which anything can be built.

https://yggdrasil-network.github.io