Those would be good additions. Especially Reuters. They're a solid, straightforward news wire service that generally provide legitimate news without opinion.
That seems to be beyond the purpose of SnapNostr. I don't see what practical use there is in adding such extended information on the images.
nostr:npub1vkgj57k30l2u7wave6t4nua75wjylx3nju6qu4vu7pneghwx8zlsf7q4uq - did you get your floors cleaned up and figured out?
It's a ongoing issue. They removed all the water from the floors and setup industrial dehumidifiers over the weekend, but my carpets need to be replaced, and there's an awful musty odor throughout my place. Mold will proliferate if the carpets stay. So, now I have to deal with the logistics of moving all my stuff from the carpeted rooms (beds, furniture, etc) so they can pull up all the old carpet, sanitize the concrete, and lay down new padding and carpets. It's probably going to be another 2 weeks before everything is done.
It's sort of a dumb strategy because it minimizes the number of players, resulting in smaller pots. At the end, these people basically end up getting their money back with maybe a few extra sats. If they waited for more people to join before pushing up the hashrate, the pot would be much larger at the end, and winning would actually mean winning.
Will you support gift-wrapped messages?
Free trade between the North American countries has greatly benefitted the United States, and the American consumers. Trump's about to destroy that with absolutely insane tariffs on Canada and Mexico. Tariffs that will significantly drive up prices on goods from our neighbors to the north and south. I hope everyone is prepared for the consequences of this idiot's ignorant plans. Massive inflation is coming.
That's essentially what I'm proposing.👍
Obergruppenführer #Musk has decided that there will be no more #links in #Tweets. He begrudgingly scolds that if people want links, they may include them in replies. Anyone who disagrees will be sent to the camps. #blog
Chromaseed is designed to convert your 12 or 24-word BIP39 seed phrase into a unique, visually coded series of colours.
https://chromaseed.btcdir.org/
🗄️ #outils de gestion 
So, we just submit our seed phrase on this random website and we get a pretty picture in return? And meanwhile, the operators of the website get our seed phrase? 🤔
Weird Al and Will Forte covering Chappell Roan is the best thing you'll see today! #music #blog
Perhaps zaps don't like the capitalization you used in your LN address? Maybe try changing it to lowercase and I'll try again.
I was able to send you sats directly from my wallet (Minibits) using your LN address. So something is breaking down in the zap process.
I am unable to zap you. It just hangs forever and never completes. I don't think the request is making it to my wallet because I usually get an error from my wallet if the zap fails, but I'm not getting getting any type of response.
I just found this old pic of me taking my little sister fishing. I was about 14, and my parents rented this little cabin on a lake in PA a few summers. I caught so many small-mouth bass in this lake. This is a really good memory for me, so I'm sharing it with you! #blog
Yes, exactly. That's where I got the idea.
You can if there's a time limit and a one-time edit restriction. If users had a 90sec window after posting a note to make corrections, I think the focus of those edits would inherently be on technical errors (punctuation, spelling errors, missing words), and not on the substantive content of the note.
It wouldn't require that every client and relay dev commit to a unified solution. Each client could for themselves whether of not to implement it. And to make it more useful, users could be able to modify the delay time. This would have the dual purpose of personalized config, and raising awareness of the feature.
It's not a wide open solution, but in my experience people notice typos, which is the type of edit that should be facilitated, right after they post the note. And if users knew they had a 90sec buffer to make those minor changes, I think they'd be more likely to review their note after posting. I think such a solution would be a lot better than what we have even if it's not perfect.
I think edits can be facilitated entirely within the client. When people post a note or a replay, the client could delay broadcasting for a period of time (60-90sec), during which time the note is essentially a draft that can be edited. Once the time limit is up, the posted note including any potential edits are broadcast. This removes any necessary work within the protocol, or programming of the relays as it's all done within the client. And each client would be able to choose whether to support the feature, while edits would automatically be seen network wide.